#51 2009-10-04 23:28:56

Dmtdust wrote:

You can still appreciate someones artistic output (say Hakim Bey) and dislike there behaviour.  I have known some absolute loonies in my time who produced brilliant music, art, business ideas, but whose personal lives were a cess-pit.

John Wayne Gacey was a fine artist.  Does that mean what he did was OK, too?

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12849.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12857.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12850.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12851.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/13142.jpg

Offline

 

#52 2009-10-04 23:47:55

whosasailorthen wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

You can still appreciate someones artistic output (say Hakim Bey) and dislike there behaviour.  I have known some absolute loonies in my time who produced brilliant music, art, business ideas, but whose personal lives were a cess-pit.

John Wayne Gacey was a fine artist.  Does that mean what he did was OK, too?

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12849.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12857.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12850.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12851.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/13142.jpg

What exactly don't you understand in my statement?

Offline

 

#53 2009-10-04 23:48:31

https://cruelery.com/uploads/13_sexskull.jpg



I’m rather charmed by this little Gacey gem.



Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

Offline

 

#54 2009-10-07 21:14:02

Offline

 

#55 2009-10-07 22:35:46

Dmtdust wrote:

whosasailorthen wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

You can still appreciate someones artistic output (say Hakim Bey) and dislike there behaviour.  I have known some absolute loonies in my time who produced brilliant music, art, business ideas, but whose personal lives were a cess-pit.

John Wayne Gacey was a fine artist.  Does that mean what he did was OK, too?

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12849.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12857.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12850.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/12851.jpg

http://www.museumsyndicate.com/images/2/13142.jpg

What exactly don't you understand in my statement?

I wasn't arguing.  I was being sarcastic.

Excuuuuuuuuussssseeeeee me. 

Cripes.

Offline

 

#56 2009-10-08 18:09:05

Here's a little sidebar.  This guy stepped up to defend Polanski.

PARIS (AP) - France's culture minister is struggling to keep his job amid an uproar about a 2005 book in which he details Bangkok's brothels and the pleasure and freedom of paying "boys" for sex.

Offline

 

#57 2009-10-08 20:57:08

whosasailorthen wrote:

I wasn't arguing.  I was being sarcastic.

Excuuuuuuuuussssseeeeee me. 

Cripes.

Really?  I just thought you had bad taste in art.  Heh.

Offline

 

#59 2009-10-15 11:13:19

um..... excellent find.  And, it says it to a "T".

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com