#2 2011-12-14 05:40:02
Darn, 502 Bad Gateway. I'll leave the tab open in case it comes back.
If you torrent, you should be using something like PeerGuardian or BlockControl. Most client have peer filters built in, you just have to make sure they are on and up to date.
Sadly, I really don't know who maintains the lists. Most lists come from www.iblocklist.com, but there's no guarantee they haven't been taken over by the industry.
As with everything else in life, torrent in moderation.
Offline
#3 2011-12-14 10:04:01
A person I will not name just went to the site and were told-
Hi. We have no records on you.
This means you are using a private torrent tracker or, of course, you may not be a torrent user at all! It happens.
I know for a fact the person torrents at least five television programs per week from EZTV, a couple documentaries from The MVGroup and occasionally a movie. I don't know what a private tracker and all that stuff means, but the person does use MicroTorrent. But even when they were using a blocklist they would get nasty letters from their ISP (a co-op phone company with a slow-ass DSL connection. Hard times forced the guy to drop RoadRunner.) about movies and even broadcast TV programs they torrented. The letters were taken less seriously when they were accused of downloading True Grit. I didn't, or they didn't even read the reviews of that one, much less download it.
Offline
#4 2011-12-14 10:24:42
So, if your IP shows up on their list, what happens if you click "Remove Me"? Do they harvest and cook your criadillas?
Offline
#5 2011-12-14 10:46:45
I also got a "No records" result and I just downloaded some Christmas albums last night. Of course, 99% of that music is in the public domain, but I'm sure the 1001 Strings version of it isn't.
Offline
#6 2011-12-14 12:17:14
I get credited for a single download. What do I win?
Offline
#7 2011-12-14 18:17:57
I am also unrecorded by that website at least I was until I clicked on their link.
Offline
#8 2011-12-14 21:54:38
Hi. We have no records on you.
This means you are using a private torrent tracker or, of course, you may not be a torrent user at all! It happens. Please, entertain yourself. Feel free to see what other people have downloaded.
Nice. Gotta love PeerBlock.
Offline
#9 2011-12-14 22:09:44
whosasailorthen wrote:
Nice. Gotta love PeerBlock.
Amen. Beat me to it. Get it here:
http://www.peerblock.com/
Offline
#10 2011-12-15 14:35:40
I'm giving it a try - never used it before. But then I seem to be the only one who was listed on the thread site. I'll be interested to see if it interferes with torrents.
Offline
#11 2011-12-15 15:14:15
For what it's worth, I'm clean. On the other hand, I'm too stupid to figure out bit torrent anyway. I'm law-abiding by default.
Offline
#12 2011-12-15 16:49:31
Fled wrote:
I'm giving it a try - never used it before. But then I seem to be the only one who was listed on the thread site. I'll be interested to see if it interferes with torrents.
It does not interfere. However, it WILL interfere with accessing shared drives on your network (if you have any).
Offline
#13 2011-12-15 17:56:08
I was clean, however I suppose I'm now on a watch list.
Offline
#14 2011-12-17 05:33:48
Fled wrote:
I'm giving it a try - never used it before. But then I seem to be the only one who was listed on the thread site. I'll be interested to see if it interferes with torrents.
No, I had 2 files listed (which is laughable). One was open source, the other was an technically an infringement, mostly upon my time... Apollo 18 sucked so bad they should pay me for the trauma. These were the only 2 files I've recently picked up not using a trusted tracker.
Peerblock helps, but keep in mind that it's just an ip blacklist. It's always out of date and trivial to defeat. Private "trusted" trackers are also pretty easy to gain access to. Proxies, especially multi-hop ones are effective, but you're either paying good money or back to dial-up speeds. TOR if used in conjunction with an SSL capable BitTorrent client is the safest way to go, but I haven't run and can't speak for TOR as far as performance.
Tall Paul wrote:
I am also unrecorded by that website at least I was until I clicked on their link.
fnord wrote:
I was clean, however I suppose I'm now on a watch list.
Innocents Abroad(band)
I'd like to present an example from the distant past. I had nothing but standard user access to cruel.com, yet I could simply post a pic from my server and harvest the ips. Whois, google and other resources allowed me to dox 85% of the ips I harvested. This was 7 or 8 years ago. This is trivial compared to current capabilities.
Keep in mind, the massive data footprint that people are leaving via google, facebook, twitter and online stores is so much more nuanced. Do not for a moment think that there's an entire industry not correlating and selling this data.
If you're ever interested in current nightmares like the triviality of stateful packet inspection, the scary state of BGP route advertisements, the fact that DNS is still mostly broken and SSL (and other root and signing) certs being hacked left and right... well don't ask me. I'll probably prevaricate.
Ever since Tim Berners-Lee created http, every site you've every visited has access to and can archive your ip. At some point Choad will probably blackmail us all. Fortunately I'm broke.
Offline
#15 2011-12-17 07:29:24
opsec wrote:
Ever since Tim Berners-Lee created http, every site you've every visited has access to and can archive your ip. At some point Choad will probably blackmail us all. Fortunately I'm broke.
The inmates run this asylum, remember? That's known in the trade as mutually assured destruction.
I've never owned a television but have to assume the monthly server invoice amounts to far less than basic cable.
Offline
#16 2011-12-17 19:23:31
opsec wrote:
.....every site you've every visited has access to and can archive your ip. At some point Choad will probably blackmail us all. Fortunately I'm broke.
If he does we'll pull an Alzado on his ass.
Offline