#1 2012-09-18 21:49:39

http://truththeory.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/319876_456012447760844_161109786_n.jpg

picture compare with Madrid fire

Offline

 

#2 2012-09-19 00:13:33

Short answer: yes.

And the hotel in Mexico didn't have a 100,000 pound object hit it at 400 miles an hour.

Offline

 

#3 2012-09-19 00:17:16

ah297900 wrote:

Short answer: yes.

And the hotel in Mexico didn't have a 100,000 pound object hit it at 400 miles an hour.

But could fire make building #7 collapse in free-fall?

Offline

 

#4 2012-09-19 01:03:29

CLEARLY NOT MY BAD IT'S TEH ILLUMINATIS

How could the bulk of trained civil engineers have missed this? Unless they're in on it too...

Offline

 

#5 2012-09-19 02:23:35

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mak5519pPz1rqf6m7o1_r1_500.jpg
edited for spam

Last edited by WilberCuntLicker (2012-09-19 02:36:02)

Offline

 

#6 2012-10-02 20:22:34

ah297900 wrote:

Short answer: yes.

And the hotel in Mexico didn't have a 100,000 pound object hit it at 400 miles an hour.

Nor this one. How do you explain.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

WTC 7 collapse

Offline

 

#7 2012-10-02 21:57:16

katsung47 wrote:

ah297900 wrote:

Short answer: yes.

And the hotel in Mexico didn't have a 100,000 pound object hit it at 400 miles an hour.

Nor this one. How do you explain.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A

WTC 7 collapse

Rebuttal

Offline

 

#8 2012-10-17 18:30:08

[img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1e/WTC_Building_Arrangement_and_Site_Plan.svg/486px-
WTC_Building_Arrangement_and_Site_Plan.svg.png[/img]


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … an.svg.png

WTC site map

1. How could WTC 2 jumped over #6 to affect #7?

2. How could collapsed WTC 2 not damage the top of building 7 but damage its bottom?

3. How could building 7 collapsed so evenly and smoothly as video shows. Your rebuttal seems work better than  demolishing work

Last edited by katsung47 (2012-10-30 20:42:47)

Offline

 

#9 2012-10-30 20:45:42

http://guardian.150m.com/wtc/small/still-alive.jpg

(10) Another reason that we know the fires were not as serious as claimed, is that there are photos of people in the impacted region after the planes hit the building (and before it collapsed). The above photos show at least two survivors of the impact and the initial jet-fuel fire.

http://guardian.150m.com/wtc/small/not-so-hot.htm

Offline

 

#10 2012-11-13 21:26:31

The fire could burn down WTC and Pentagon but couldn’t burn a hair of a monitor and book?

http://thumbs.myopera.com/sz/colx/katsung47/albums/12298112/Pentagon%20book.PNG?1347996552

Pentagon book

http://my.opera.com/katsung47/albums/sh … =165391572

Pentagon monitor


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmP2Vy8K0i0&NR=1

The pentagon was not hit by a airliner. See for yourself

Offline

 

#11 2012-11-13 22:18:15

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICL … esses.html

Note that all eyewitness accounts are linked to their source.  I know you'll probably dismiss this by claiming these are all "Feds".

Offline

 

#12 2012-11-28 20:44:25

9/11 Conspiracy Solved: Names, Connections, & Details Exposed!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl … _fp5kaVYhk

At 21:53 min. - the Pentagon's missing $2.3 trillion is announced by Donald Rumsfeld, and it's interesting, that the destruction of that area of Pentagon and Building 7 were connected to these missing trillions of dollars.

Offline

 

#13 2012-12-02 19:29:47

Hi Katsung47! I've missed you (affixes jingle bells to your tinfoil helmet)

Offline

 

#14 2012-12-12 18:18:08

The original photo shows that the damage was a hole 2 ½ yards in diameter. Could the whole Boeing squeeze into it?

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/impact1_477px.jpg

THE EVIDENCE:
One hole, 2 ½ yards in diameter

Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ½ yards in diameter.

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero14/ … rou_en.htm

Offline

 

#15 2012-12-13 17:58:09

katsung47 wrote:

The original photo shows that the damage was a hole 2 ½ yards in diameter. Could the whole Boeing squeeze into it?

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/impact1_477px.jpg

THE EVIDENCE:
One hole, 2 ½ yards in diameter

Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ½ yards in diameter.

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero14/ … rou_en.htm

Yeah, that "cruise missile" knocked down lamp posts and hit a electrical box in a perfect simulation of an airplane.  Then, just to be really sneaky, it dumped a whole bunch of smashed jet parts (like the engines) all over hell's half acre.

Offline

 

#16 2012-12-13 20:02:46

Ironic that the plane at the pentagon left behind 'plane parts' but the one that crashed in pennsylvania didn't.  I mean there was not even a 'plane molecule' in the penn crash.  If you don't believe it, do a search and you will not even find a skymall magazine.  Our gov't says, 'it disintegrated', even though no plane has ever disintegrated before.

And don't get me started about the thermite.

Offline

 

#17 2012-12-13 20:14:22

I'm not into conspiracy but when I saw that first tower come down so perfect and orderly I was astounded and immediately thought "No way"; it literally blew out by floors in an organized manner.

Then again the Pentagon plane doesn't bother me, commercial jets are simply hollow aluminum tubes.  And I saw the damage done on the day, it took out a huge section of the building.

Offline

 

#18 2012-12-13 21:24:42

Lip shitz wrote:

Ironic that the plane at the pentagon left behind 'plane parts' but the one that crashed in pennsylvania didn't.  I mean there was not even a 'plane molecule' in the penn crash.  If you don't believe it, do a search and you will not even find a skymall magazine.  Our gov't says, 'it disintegrated', even though no plane has ever disintegrated before.

And don't get me started about the thermite.

Offline

 

#19 2012-12-26 21:35:06

Baywolfe wrote:

katsung47 wrote:

The original photo shows that the damage was a hole 2 ½ yards in diameter. Could the whole Boeing squeeze into it?

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/impact1_477px.jpg

THE EVIDENCE:
One hole, 2 ½ yards in diameter

Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ½ yards in diameter.

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero14/ … rou_en.htm

Yeah, that "cruise missile" knocked down lamp posts and hit a electrical box in a perfect simulation of an airplane.  Then, just to be really sneaky, it dumped a whole bunch of smashed jet parts (like the engines) all over hell's half acre.

And without touching a hair of those objects (looks like cable ring wheels)?

http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/hole11.jpg

Offline

 

#20 2012-12-27 21:32:07

katsung47 wrote:

Baywolfe wrote:

katsung47 wrote:

The original photo shows that the damage was a hole 2 ½ yards in diameter. Could the whole Boeing squeeze into it?

http://www.apfn.org/apfn/impact1_477px.jpg

THE EVIDENCE:
One hole, 2 ½ yards in diameter

Whatever hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 made a hole several meters wide in the front wall between the first and second floors. It emerged three blocks later, leaving behind a perfectly round hole of about 2 ½ yards in diameter.

http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero14/ … rou_en.htm

Yeah, that "cruise missile" knocked down lamp posts and hit a electrical box in a perfect simulation of an airplane.  Then, just to be really sneaky, it dumped a whole bunch of smashed jet parts (like the engines) all over hell's half acre.

And without touching a hair of those objects (looks like cable ring wheels)?

http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/hole11.jpg

Show me a picture of any of that shit sitting outside the Pentagon prior to the plane hitting it.  You can't do it because it wasn't there. 

https://cruelery.com/uploads/157_conspiracy.jpg

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

Offline

 

#21 2013-01-12 17:26:57

Baywolfe wrote:

katsung47 wrote:

Baywolfe wrote:


Yeah, that "cruise missile" knocked down lamp posts and hit a electrical box in a perfect simulation of an airplane.  Then, just to be really sneaky, it dumped a whole bunch of smashed jet parts (like the engines) all over hell's half acre.

And without touching a hair of those objects (looks like cable ring wheels)?

http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/hole11.jpg

Show me a picture of any of that shit sitting outside the Pentagon prior to the plane hitting it.  You can't do it because it wasn't there. 

https://cruelery.com/uploads/157_conspiracy.jpg

You are right, I don't have picture to prove it because I did not involve in 911 attack. You think you can win a debate by requesting something impossible on others? Not really. When you want others do something, please prove there was nothing there with your own picture.

By common sense, the picture was taken between building being hit and collapsing. It was only about 40 minutes. Now explain why and whom moved all those cable ring wheel subjects there?

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com