#1 2007-10-15 00:28:29

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/9481/wtfjs4.jpg

I weep for humanity.

Offline

 

#2 2007-10-15 02:12:03

That's nice, dear.

Offline

 

#3 2007-10-15 05:29:26

I'd like to felch a syphilitic mongoose. Since they're small enough to service my withered genitals, it would save regulars the bother of having to actually read my posts and instead draw up a mental picture of me servicing rodentia. This would then maximize our efficiency and provide for an overall more productive High Street experience, plus I'd finally get some.

Offline

 

#4 2007-10-15 02:41:09

Taint wrote:

I'd like to propose a category for those who want to make lame posts.

You guys don't know what kind of bear you're baiting but I leave you to your fates. Always fun to watch.

You'll take a cruel hiatus yourselves, eventually and you'll sing off key when you return, too. Yes, sir, always a yummy selection of fresh meat here.

Offline

 

#5 2007-10-15 02:49:59

choad wrote:

You'll take a cruel hiatus yourselves, eventually and you'll sing off key when you return, too. Yes, sir, always a yummy selection of fresh meat here.

Lay off the 100-proof, Billy.

Offline

 

#6 2007-10-15 03:05:25

Closest I get to a buzz anymore is sleep deprivation.

Offline

 

#7 2007-10-15 04:20:46

This might have been passable appended to the Picture thread.  I'm assuming that's still where we post pictures?

Offline

 

#8 2007-10-15 07:18:05

tojo2000 wrote:

This might have been passable appended to the Picture thread.  I'm assuming that's still where we post pictures?

That might be fine and dandy for people who spend more than 30 minutes a week on this board.  I personally don't care enough about most of the posts to sift through them all, but rather pick and choose from those posters that I find "worthy".

Offline

 

#9 2007-10-15 07:36:12

Taint wrote:

I'd like to felch a syphilitic mongoose. Since they're small enough to service my withered genitals, it would save regulars the bother of having to actually read my posts and instead draw up a mental picture of me servicing rodentia. This would then maximize our efficiency and provide for an overall more productive High Street experience, plus I'd finally get some.

Awesome!

Offline

 

#10 2007-10-15 11:10:27

Baiting an admin can be a bit dicey around here.  Just imagine the fucktardery that will ensue when 2 admins go at it.

Offline

 

#11 2007-10-15 11:14:35

opsec wrote:

Baiting an admin can be a bit dicey around here.  Just imagine the fucktardery that will ensue when 2 admins go at it.

I have no idea who edited Taint's post.  But goddamn it was funny.

Offline

 

#12 2007-10-15 11:20:28

opsec wrote:

Baiting an admin can be a bit dicey around here.  Just imagine the fucktardery that will ensue when 2 admins go at it.

Five of them in this thread alone, there's cruelty on a previously unimagined scale. We could sell tickets, and refreshments; make a fortune even before the wagering begins.

Offline

 

#13 2007-10-15 11:20:42

Roger_That wrote:

I have no idea who edited Taint's post.  But goddamn it was funny.

I assume it was the offended party, although you can't put anything past the Purple Bastard.  And yes, it was funny as hell.

Still, with the stable of admins we have here I can see this sort of thing ending in tears.  Perhaps of laughter.

Offline

 

#14 2007-10-15 11:24:28

choad wrote:

opsec wrote:

Baiting an admin can be a bit dicey around here.  Just imagine the fucktardery that will ensue when 2 admins go at it.

Four of them in this thread alone, there's cruelty on a previously unimagined scale. We could sell tickets, and refreshments; make a fortune even before the wagering begins.

My E-Penis™ is bigger than yours!

Offline

 

#15 2007-10-15 11:32:27

Roger_That wrote:

My E-Penis™ is bigger than yours!

Sorry, I can't top that.

Offline

 

#16 2007-10-15 11:37:57

choad wrote:

Roger_That wrote:

My E-Penis™ is bigger than yours!

Sorry, I can't top that.

No, but with a gaping E-Hole™ you'll be as popular as ever.

Offline

 

#17 2007-10-15 11:52:52

Taint wrote:

No, but with a gaping E-Hole™ you'll be as popular as ever.

Maybe with you...

Offline

 

#18 2007-10-15 12:00:16

Taint, I warned you. And that was not me. True, I thought it was hilarious.

If this becomes a problem we elect an admin and the rest become moderators. Or I dunno, something.

Offline

 

#19 2007-10-15 12:02:37

Alas, not everyone in the goatse crowd meets my exacting standards.

[redacted due to eye pain]

Offline

 

#20 2007-10-15 12:08:24

JESUS

WHO DID THAT

I AM AT WORK!  MAKE IT STOP

Offline

 

#21 2007-10-15 12:09:22

choad wrote:

Taint, I warned you. And that was not me. True, I thought it was hilarious.

If this becomes a problem we elect an admin and the rest become moderators. Or I dunno, something.

What was not you?  I haven't fucked with any of Taint's posts except to remove the female goatse.  UGH!

Put it on the pic thread, save my job!

Offline

 

#22 2007-10-15 12:14:04

Roger_That wrote:

JESUS

WHO DID THAT

I AM AT WORK!  MAKE IT STOP

We seriously need to start marking threads NSFW,  and keeping that content in them.

Offline

 

#23 2007-10-15 12:17:22

Thanks to cooperation and our strong sense of High Street pride, another lame post has become much, much more interesting.

Offline

 

#24 2007-10-15 12:19:26

Roger_That wrote:

I haven't fucked with any of Taint's posts except to remove the female goatse.  UGH!

Shake down cruise, remember? We'll get there.

Offline

 

#25 2007-10-15 12:22:03

Taint wrote:

Thanks to cooperation and our strong sense of High Street pride, another lame post has become much, much more interesting.

Yep....indeed.

That nasty Goatse chick is going to be a bann-ible offense (is that a word??) from now on.

Offline

 

#26 2007-10-15 13:08:15

No shit?

Offline

 

#27 2007-10-15 14:40:46

pALEPHx wrote:

That's nice, dear.

Yeah, you know, that really doesn't carry quite the same bite on a site named High-Street.

Roger_That wrote:

I haven't fucked with any of Taint's posts except to remove the female goatse.  UGH!

What - Before I had a chance to see it?  Damn it, Woggah!

Offline

 

#28 2007-10-15 14:59:14

You admins sure are getting to be a trigger happy bunch

Offline

 

#29 2007-10-15 15:11:25

Yep, I did it.

Truth be told, the edit was more worthy of this crowd than the original picture.

I'm rusty, and hope to remain that way.

Also, other than the whole work thing, is there any other reason for posting all pictures in one thread?

Offline

 

#30 2007-10-15 15:12:58

No, I really don't care if pics go on any thread...speaking for myself.  I just hiccuped at the goatse, as my boss almost walked in while it was up on the screen.

Are you an admin too?  Do you mean you edited Taint's text?  I'm corn-fused.

Goddamned drugs.

Offline

 

#31 2007-10-15 15:18:30

Profile/Display allows you to customize seeing images in threads.

Offline

 

#32 2007-10-15 15:19:50

AlterId wrote:

Profile/Display allows you to customize seeing images in threads.

No shit.  I don't mind seeing the pics even at work, but the big gaping anus in my face just set off some sort of primal fight or flight response.

Offline

 

#33 2007-10-15 15:20:57

Roger_That wrote:

Are you an admin too?  Do you mean you edited Taint's text?  I'm corn-fused.

Goddamned drugs.

Yep.

Some dumbass gave me a god-gun.


Mwahahahaha.

So did you have hymen reconstruction surgery or what?

Offline

 

#34 2007-10-15 15:23:19

XregnaR wrote:

Yep.

Some dumbass gave me a god-gun.


Mwahahahaha.

So did you have hymen reconstruction surgery or what?

Wow, there sure are a lot of cooks in this kitchen.

Which of my recent two surgeries are you inquiring about?  I did ask about that for the first surgery, but they decided to cut into me, instead of doing any sort of vaginal repair.

The other one only affected my ability to balance while getting hot aussie lovin' from behind.  I'm sure the wrist will be back up to its supporting efforts soon enough.

Offline

 

#35 2007-10-15 15:28:38

Roger_That wrote:

Wow, there sure are a lot of cooks in this kitchen.

Somehow appropriate with this lot.

Roger_That wrote:

Which of my recent two surgeries are you inquiring about?  I did ask about that for the first surgery, but they decided to cut into me, instead of doing any sort of vaginal repair.

The other one only affected my ability to balance while getting hot aussie lovin' from behind.  I'm sure the wrist will be back up to its supporting efforts soon enough.

Still with the mystery from Oz?  That must be some personal record eh?

So you finally letting 'em drill for oil in your backyard?

Offline

 

#36 2007-10-15 15:30:27

XregnaR wrote:

Still with the mystery from Oz?  That must be some personal record eh?

So you finally letting 'em drill for oil in your backyard?

Yeah, the only one that had lasted longer was my marriage (*shudders*). 

And no backyard drilling.  He has expressed clearly he has no desire to go there.  Who am I to argue?

Offline

 

#37 2007-10-15 15:31:51

Roger_That wrote:

.....He has expressed clearly he has no desire to go there.  Who am I to argue?

He's only biding his time.

Offline

 

#38 2007-10-15 15:33:13

XregnaR wrote:

Roger_That wrote:

.....He has expressed clearly he has no desire to go there.  Who am I to argue?

He's only biding his time.

Hmm.  I guess he's biding his time for buttsecks as much as I'm jonesing for a diamond ring and a second marriage...

Offline

 

#39 2007-10-15 15:50:49

XregnaR wrote:

Also, other than the whole work thing, is there any other reason for posting all pictures in one thread?

If you're referring to my comment, I was mostly commenting on the fact that a post with no title and only a lame picture would have been okay appended to the picture thread, but was teh lame as its own topic.

Offline

 

#40 2007-10-15 15:53:43

I also object to the idea of removing NSFW pictures because of work concerns.  Is there a way to turn off pictures?  That would be a better solution.

Offline

 

#41 2007-10-15 15:58:19

tojo2000 wrote:

I also object to the idea of removing NSFW pictures because of work concerns.  Is there a way to turn off pictures?  That would be a better solution.

Read the thread, and I don't care what you object to.  This is not a democracy!

Offline

 

#42 2007-10-15 15:58:58

Reread the thread toejam.

Offline

 

#43 2007-10-15 16:02:59

Roger_That wrote:

This is not a democracy!

Does anarchy work for you?

Offline

 

#44 2007-10-15 16:05:30

choad wrote:

Roger_That wrote:

This is not a democracy!

Does anarchy work for you?

Yes.

Offline

 

#45 2007-10-15 16:06:09

choad wrote:

Roger_That wrote:

This is not a democracy!

Does anarchy work for you?

Let's start a pool.  I give it 23 days.

Offline

 

#46 2007-10-15 16:06:55

AlterId wrote:

Let's start a pool.  I give it 23 days.

I am the Gene Pool Cleaner.  What say we start with you?

Offline

 

#47 2007-10-15 16:09:56

Yo doofus, you're an admin, as if my nick wasn't enough of a clue.

Safeway carries Honeycrisps too, so I don't have to trek to the hebe store.  Yes, they are some very good apples.

Offline

 

#48 2007-10-15 16:10:42

choad wrote:

Roger_That wrote:

This is not a democracy!

Does anarchy work for you?

"All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others."

Hi, Snowball!  {No, don't bother looking - She's not in this thread}

Offline

 

#49 2007-10-15 16:11:56

AlterId wrote:

Yo doofus, you're an admin, as if my nick wasn't enough of a clue.

Safeway carries Honeycrisps too, so I don't have to trek to the hebe store.  Yes, they are some very good apples.

FAG.  I don't have time for your baiting BS!

Yes, I know Safeway has them.  Aren't they the bizz-omb?  I'm eating one now.

Mah Paw says that the Costco has them in bulk packages...mmm.

Offline

 

#50 2007-10-15 16:13:05

Peace out fools, time to hit the gym.

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com