• Home
  •  » High Street
  •  » I’m Sure They Called the Wrong Delivery Service

#1 2008-01-04 07:26:06

This is wrong and stupid on so many levels, I don’t know where to begin.

Offline

 

#2 2008-01-04 07:59:05

Although two topics featuring the misadventures of black/latino folk don't constitute a 'pattern,' what [to you] is so wrong and stupid about this particular incident? It's a crime of convenience. I probably would have given the female delivery staff New Year's off, tho. Sending lone women to strange houses full of drunk people got a little iffy with those lacrosse players.

Offline

 

#3 2008-01-04 08:32:08

pALEPHx wrote:

Although two topics featuring the misadventures of black/latino folk don't constitute a 'pattern,' what [to you] is so wrong and stupid about this particular incident? It's a crime of convenience. I probably would have given the female delivery staff New Year's off, tho. Sending lone women to strange houses full of drunk people got a little iffy with those lacrosse players.

What was wrong and stupid about this?  The idea of a three-way, rape or otherwise, with one’s father is gross.  The delivery person’s movements can be traced, which guarantees that at some point the idiots that tried to rape her at their home would be identified.  Of course if she hadn’t escaped, the rapists might have been able to cross the border back into Mexico.  Mexico rarely extradites criminals back to the US to face justice.

You need to keep up.  It turns out the lap dancer was a lying whore.  A vaginal swab turned up semen from 5 different men; none of the semen matched the DNA of the lacrosse players.

Edit:  I shouldn’t have to say this, but the idea of raping a woman is wrong in and of itself.  Your saying “it was a crime of convenience” implies the woman was somehow partly responsible.  What kind of sick mind sizes up a situation and calculates whether or not rape is doable?

Last edited by fnord (2008-01-04 09:59:14)

Offline

 

#4 2008-01-04 08:44:53

fnord wrote:

You need to keep up.  It turns out the lap dancer was a lying whore.  A vaginal swab turned up semen from 5 different men; none of the semen matched the DNA of the lacrosse players.

While I agree with you about he lap dancer, ask anyone who went to Duke (I have several friends who did graduate work there)...the LaCrosse team got lucky.  They were well known on campus and beyond for their shenanigans, which I think contributed to Nifong being convinced that he had a good case.

Offline

 

#5 2008-01-04 09:43:41

fnord wrote:

You need to keep up.  It turns out the lap dancer was a lying whore.  A vaginal swab turned up semen from 5 different men; none of the semen matched the DNA of the lacrosse players.

Raping a slut is still rape.


...sloppy, loose-pussy rape.  Mmmmmmmm........

Offline

 

#6 2008-01-04 09:49:31

jesusluvspegging wrote:

fnord wrote:

You need to keep up.  It turns out the lap dancer was a lying whore.  A vaginal swab turned up semen from 5 different men; none of the semen matched the DNA of the lacrosse players.

Raping a slut is still rape.


...sloppy, loose-pussy rape.  Mmmmmmmm........

There was no rape!  The semen was left over from her business activities!  In other words, she didn’t clean herself properly between clients.

Offline

 

#7 2008-01-04 09:51:37

fnord wrote:

There was no rape!  The semen was left over from her business activities!  In other words, she didn’t clean herself properly between clients.

Or those nice Duke boys used protection.  Or the cops didn't take swabs of her face.

Offline

 

#9 2008-01-04 17:11:03

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Or those nice Duke boys used protection.  Or the cops didn't take swabs of her face.

You can't splooge in a stripper's face without her crying rape?  What the hell are you paying her for?

Offline

 

#10 2008-01-04 17:46:58

I wasn't so much challenging the 'wrongness' as I was curious about your reaction. You've mistaken my intentions and interpretations in a coupla places...

fnord wrote:

What was wrong and stupid about this? The idea of a three-way, rape or otherwise, with one’s father is gross. The delivery person’s movements can be traced, which guarantees that at some point the idiots that tried to rape her at their home would be identified. Of course if she hadn’t escaped, the rapists might have been able to cross the border back into Mexico. Mexico rarely extradites criminals back to the US to face justice.

You say "cross" so casually, as if a 600+ mi. journey to El Paso and beyond would have been the most logical recourse. There's really very little logic here, which is something you might not be grasping because your racism blinds you. Threeway with Dad = Gross, yes, but there's nothing amorous or even necessarily sexual about this. Father showing son how to be aggressive and domineering, to subjugate and victimize women...more likely. And that's not even a "Latino thing." You can bet a rich white daddy somewhere is buying his son a hooker, as we speak. Can't afford one? The next step for Sociopathy 101 is to grab what's available.

fnord wrote:

You need to keep up. It turns out the lap dancer was a lying whore. A vaginal swab turned up semen from 5 different men; none of the semen matched the DNA of the lacrosse players.

Oh, I know all about the Duke case. This was mentioned more as humor than counterpoint. Nobody's hands were clean in that affair, but after being so atrociously handled, it's hard to say everyone got what they asked for.

fnord wrote:

Edit: I shouldn’t have to say this, but the idea of raping a woman is wrong in and of itself. Your saying “it was a crime of convenience” implies the woman was somehow partly responsible. What kind of sick mind sizes up a situation and calculates whether or not rape is doable?

I did not imply in any way that the woman was responsible. And you really answer your own question. That's precisely what a 'sick' mind does: sizes up a situation and calculates what sort of shit it can get away with. Obviously, they neither counted on her escaping nor had the insight to appreciate that her deliveries are logged. Although the article doesn't explicitly state so, was there a strong probability that two men alone in a house on New Year's Eve had been drinking? I would think so, but that doesn't excuse their actions either.

All I'm saying is, don't get too hung up on the relation between rapists. It (brothers, cousins, father-son, etc.) happens a lot more often than you'd care to think. Also relatively unimportant is their ethnic or cultural background. The crime could have occurred anywhere, at any time, and among any racial group (tho rape is less often an interracial situation, if that satisfies you).

Crime reporting on holidays is a big deal...almost as big as insinuating that the people of Denver need to worry more about crazed Mexican rapists. It's really an "immigration reform piece" in disguise, except that the publishers have no obligation to disclose their political opinions as expressed by their coverage.

Offline

 
  • Home
  •  » High Street
  •  » I’m Sure They Called the Wrong Delivery Service

Board footer

cruelery.com