#1 2009-07-24 09:43:01
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2 2009-07-24 09:46:59
He has been a tad bitchy of late.
Offline
#5 2009-07-24 17:20:19
Is Pale a bad one?
I wish I could give a shit
About what Tripps says.
Offline
#6 2009-07-24 17:28:51
A long time ago, I once made a snarky criticism of a post of Roger_That's (this was so long ago that she wasn't Roger_That yet).
Her response was "POST SOMETHING FUNNY, BITCH."
And that's really all that needs to be said.
Now quit pickin' on Pale.
Oh, and Pale? POST SOMETHING FUNNY, BITCH.
Last edited by George Orr (2009-07-24 17:30:14)
Offline
#7 2009-07-24 17:36:26
George Orr wrote:
Now quit pickin' on Pale.
I'm not. This is research.
Offline
#8 2009-07-24 17:37:09
George Orr wrote:
A long time ago, I once made a snarky criticism of a post of Roger_That's (this was so long ago that she wasn't Roger_That yet).
I believe you and RT are the only ones with seniority over me. Correction welcome.
Offline
#9 2009-07-24 17:51:23
George Orr wrote:
A long time ago, I once made a snarky criticism of a post of Roger_That's
After a similar Smitty bite-me-gram, I posted almost nothing but links for a year. Happily, take it to Drudge also remains useful advice.
Offline
#10 2009-07-24 18:34:55
MSG Tripps wrote:
George Orr wrote:
Now quit pickin' on Pale.
I'm not. This is research.
And you will be publishing your thesis on a peer-reviewed journal, so make sure you've got everything just so. A smarmy dink like you won't be cut a bit of slack.
(Pale? You are not exempt.)
Last edited by sigmoid freud (2009-07-24 18:36:38)
Offline
#11 2009-07-24 18:55:18
Boy Howdy sigmoid freud. Hey, I am entitled to my opinions. I just don't post them 35 or more times in a row, repeatedly.
just sayin'
Offline
#12 2009-07-24 18:55:40
sigmoid freud wrote:
Is Pale a bad one?
I wish I could give a shit
About what Tripps says.
Nice Haiku
Offline
#13 2009-07-24 19:04:23
MSG Tripps wrote:
Boy Howdy sigmoid freud. Hey, I am entitled to my opinions. I just don't post them 35 or more times in a row, repeatedly. just sayin'
No, just one at a time, quite boringly. There'll be many a dry eye here, when you leave.
Last edited by sigmoid freud (2009-07-24 19:04:51)
Offline
#14 2009-07-24 19:20:34
MSG Tripps wrote:
I vote for more pics of twinks.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#15 2009-07-24 19:45:20
sigmoid freud wrote:
There'll be many a dry eye here, when you leave.
That's alright with me.
You should vote your thoughts, sigmoid freud. Then let it ride and see what happens.
Offline
#16 2009-07-24 19:47:29
an influx of noobs
yet we choose to eat our own
stay classy, High Street
Offline
#17 2009-07-24 19:55:28
Tripps feels inadequate
lashes out at random folks
cockgobbler himself
Last edited by Bigcat (2009-07-24 20:01:14)
Offline
#18 2009-07-24 19:57:03
Bigcat wrote:
Tripps feels inadequate
lashes out at random
cockgobbler in his own way
um, that's... incorrect.
5-7-5 bitch.
Offline
#19 2009-07-24 19:58:38
jesusluvspegging wrote:
Bigcat wrote:
Tripps feels inadequate
lashes out at random
cockgobbler in his own wayum, that's... incorrect.
5-7-5 bitch.
How about now? I think it's right.
Last edited by Bigcat (2009-07-24 20:00:48)
Offline
#20 2009-07-24 20:05:34
Bigcat wrote:
jesusluvspegging wrote:
Bigcat wrote:
Tripps feels inadequate
lashes out at random
cockgobbler in his own wayum, that's... incorrect.
5-7-5 bitch.How about now? I think it's right.
That's still 6 in the first line. In-ad-e-quate.
You're bad at this.
Offline
#21 2009-07-24 20:07:08
Sarge engages Pale
a battle of the witless
get a room, you fags
Offline
#22 2009-07-24 20:11:28
jesusluvspegging wrote:
Bigcat wrote:
jesusluvspegging wrote:
um, that's... incorrect.
5-7-5 bitch.How about now? I think it's right.
That's still 6 in the first line. In-ad-e-quate.
You're bad at this.
Fuck! I know.
Offline
#23 2009-07-24 20:12:04
Haiku! It has been along time.
Offline
#24 2009-07-24 20:15:10
jesusluvspegging wrote:
Sarge engages Pale
a battle of the witless
get a room, you fags
That, sir, is brilliant.
Offline
#25 2009-07-24 20:17:32
haysus write haiku
beautiful words for our fun
i need a snack now
Offline
#26 2009-07-24 20:22:42
bigcat, most banal,
assembles words at random
...still better than Dirck.
Last edited by jesusluvspegging (2009-07-24 20:23:08)
Offline
#27 2009-07-24 21:03:41
Bitch not at dirckman
His pictures of costumed cocks
Put Pale's "gay" to shame.
OK, now someone bust into some iambic pentameter.
Last edited by opsec (2009-07-24 21:03:58)
Offline
#29 2009-07-24 21:23:30
I blew curry chicken salad out my nose. Thank you, thank you thank you!
Offline
#30 2009-07-24 21:45:02
MSG Tripps wrote:
Hey opsec.
Sorry old man.
Hey MSG Tripps.
Just another example of the EU not having a clue when it comes to proper Functional Goat Specifications. 3 days, 5 days... come on this is normative stuff!
Offline
#31 2009-07-24 21:46:42
my opinion on
iambic pentameter:
Shakespeare was a hack
Offline
#32 2009-07-24 22:34:03
jesusluvspegging wrote:
my opinion on
iambic pentameter:
Shakespeare was a hack
A Baconite! Burn... err... Crucify him!
Offline
#33 2009-07-24 22:40:52
opsec wrote:
jesusluvspegging wrote:
my opinion on
iambic pentameter:
Shakespeare was a hackA Baconite! Burn... err... Crucify him!
the crucifixion
would not have been so bad, but
fuckwit missed the stud
Offline
#34 2009-07-25 18:33:12
What, MSG got laid off from his cafeteria-sorry, IT (sortIng uTensils)-job and had to bag on someone? Nice! Stay classy, guy.
Offline
#35 2009-07-25 22:09:47
You guys suck
Die Thread Die
Offline
#36 2009-07-26 00:04:58
another dead thread
mindless babbling fucktards
put them all to sleep
Offline
#37 2009-07-26 06:51:39
Sarge, you can simply
ignore his rambling postings.
It worked on Tommy.
Offline
#38 2009-07-26 07:31:15
WTF is this? I suppose I should be gratified by the current voting results, but how would the rest of you like me to squash my posts down w/o using a higher vocabulary? That's not the goddamn point. I barely show up here every three or four days anymore. Who the hell was bored enough to create this, and what result was expected? Oh, thass rite. It was Dhal, the ancient moron everyone regards as a fixture but whose misanthropy seems to just glide by everyone's better senses. He hasn't ever liked me, and I don't expect him to start now.
If this forum had an ounce of the old Cruel, then I could merely say "Fuck you, dickless bastard," and that would be all anyone might say. Unfortunately, we have to co-exist, and I really didn't think there was a problem worthy of a thread all its own. I was/am just fine with his presence.
Drop dead, you meaningless fossil. People tolerate you out of familiarity, not because they care what you say, because you produce nothing fresh nor interesting. If you're satisfied with a role you had two years ago, then try to find a fucking a time machine. I'm not here enough anymore to focus your energy on, but if you care to waste your venom in my direction, you are nothing but a facile, predictable idiot.
Offline
#39 2009-07-26 07:44:24
pALEPHx wrote:
WTF is this? I suppose I should be gratified by the current voting results
The point is, the majority does not appreciate you coming around here and spamming 30-40+ posts in a row.
Now be a nice fellow and stop it.
Thank you.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by MSG Tripps (2009-07-26 10:24:05)
Offline
#40 2009-07-26 07:59:05
pALEPHx wrote:
He hasn't ever liked me, and I don't expect him to start now.
Join the club. By the way, your member-ship fee is due by Tuesday. We - Obviously - prefer cash, but, will accept a check with two forms of identification.
Offline
#41 2009-07-26 08:06:42
Decadence wrote:
Join the club.
Aw, you're alright Decadence. This is not about whether someone "likes" someone. It is about spamming and taking a poll to ascertain what the board thinks.
I do not want to read 30-40+ posts in a row from anyone. Do you?
Last edited by MSG Tripps (2009-07-26 08:13:08)
Offline
#42 2009-07-26 08:29:48
I don't care about his "spamming," which I hadn't really noticed. It is annoying how he's been on this "you fuckers don't post anything interesting waaaaaah entertain me cretins" bent lately.
Offline
#43 2009-07-26 08:36:25
jesusluvspegging wrote:
It is annoying how he's been on this "you fuckers don't post anything interesting waaaaaah entertain me cretins" bent lately.
There is that also.
Offline
#44 2009-07-26 08:40:12
I figure he just misses Wilbur and has been trying to pick a new fight to satisfy his homosexual instinct for catty drama, which you have given him.
Offline
#45 2009-07-26 08:49:14
jesusluvspegging wrote:
I figure he just misses Wilbur and has been trying to pick a new fight to satisfy his homosexual instinct for catty drama, which you have given him.
Be that as it may, should one have to wade through piles of shit to stay current here?
I maintain that a newbie doing the exact same things would have been slaughtered not coddled.
Last edited by MSG Tripps (2009-07-26 08:50:33)
Offline
#46 2009-07-26 08:56:24
Point granted.
Offline
#47 2009-07-26 11:29:58
Well thank god everyone loves me, or I'd feel pretty insecure, as well.
Offline
#48 2009-07-26 19:48:56
Thank god the HS crew barely knows me...I'm like the 2nd cousin you only see at Thanksgiving; mildly amusing, but kind of creepy.
Offline
#49 2009-07-26 23:32:38
George Orr wrote:
A long time ago, I once made a snarky criticism of a post of Roger_That's (this was so long ago that she wasn't Roger_That yet).
Her response was "POST SOMETHING FUNNY, BITCH."
And that's really all that needs to be said.
Now quit pickin' on Pale.
Oh, and Pale? POST SOMETHING FUNNY, BITCH.
HAHAHHA I remember that! Some advice stands the test of time.
Offline
#50 2009-07-26 23:46:03
Dhal keeps fighting Pale.
Damn you drama queens to hell.
Who cares anyway?
Offline
