#1 2007-11-08 23:39:17
Two hours I grunted to excrete something appropriately cruel and SQUAT.
Offline
#2 2007-11-08 23:45:06
Hey Sofie, someone told me you'd gone violently insane, brutally attacked a mime and were locked up in a mental institution. Or something like that.
Break out soon!
Offline
#3 2007-11-08 23:51:50
choad wrote:
Two hours I grunted to excrete something appropriately cruel and SQUAT.
You must be squatting wrong. It usually works for me.
Offline
#4 2007-11-08 23:54:55
opsec wrote:
Hey Sofie, someone told me you'd gone violently insane, brutally attacked a mime and were locked up in a mental institution. Or something like that.
Word has it she smuggled her laptop into the ward and she's amusing the other inmates with our High-Street lunatics.
Offline
#5 2007-11-09 01:46:28
I'd heard she was in hospital for for a sex-change operation. Just sayin'...
{redacted image}
Last edited by choad (2007-11-09 11:30:13)
Offline
#6 2007-11-09 01:51:27
Taint wrote:
I'd heard she was in hospital for for a sex-change operation. Just sayin'...
http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/3083 … ge1ow0.jpg
What the fuck is that???
Offline
#7 2007-11-09 01:59:09
A female with a double mastectomy and a double-dose of testosterone. Apparently.
Offline
#8 2007-11-09 04:55:33
What the fuck...?
Whatever's wrong with you, sofa, make them fix it and get the hell out of there quick!
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#9 2007-11-09 08:16:25
There is ALWAYS one of you fuckers that ruins a link with a fucking XXX link that will one day get me canned from my job. TAINT YOU FAG!
Sofie, hurry it up and get well you fucking filthy bitch! Don't make me come over there and jam a hair spray encrusted flat iron up your puckerstar!
Offline
#10 2007-11-09 10:41:45
Roger_That wrote:
There is ALWAYS one of you fuckers that ruins a link with a fucking XXX link that will one day get me canned from my job.
I would think that some of the banners are not very SFW. The bleeder and and the anime girl spanking here hoochie come to mind.
Offline
#11 2007-11-09 12:48:13
Yeah, but there are so many banners that I am willing to play porn roulette and hope I don't get one...
Offline
#12 2007-11-09 12:54:09
Zookeeper wrote:
I would think that some of the banners are not very SFW. The bleeder and and the anime girl spanking here hoochie come to mind.
Wilbur's spanker didn't last long but I'm not sure I spotted a bleeder. Thanks, I'll check.
Offline
#13 2007-11-09 13:01:52
yeah, nekkid people on banners can be bad, even though like I said, it's roulette there.
Offline
#14 2007-11-09 13:14:19
May you come romping back to enlighten us.
Berachah V'Hatzlachah
Last edited by shagnasty (2007-11-09 13:16:53)
Offline
#15 2007-11-09 13:25:22
RT you need a new job! I browse this site at work all the time and have no problem, I send all my co-workers stuff from here but never give up my source. I love this place like I loved Cruel... The looks on co-workers faces... PRICELESS!
Offline
#16 2007-11-09 14:30:30
I think she smoked herself into a major paranoia event. Sofie, get out of the institution soon and if you see this cat, throw something at it!
Offline
#17 2007-11-09 15:06:44
If you're going to be laid up for a while anyway, mayhaps you'll finally have the time to make it all the way through the Infinite Cat Project now (I think that I made it through about twenty minutes worth one day).
Offline
#18 2007-11-09 15:36:46
choad wrote:
I'm not sure I spotted a bleeder. Thanks, I'll check.
I was referring to the "cruel.com's bitter afterbirth" banner.
Offline
#19 2007-11-09 15:50:24
Zookeeper wrote:
choad wrote:
I'm not sure I spotted a bleeder. Thanks, I'll check.
I was referring to the "cruel.com's bitter afterbirth" banner.
Oh. Yeah. That gave me serious pause. Well, as long as we're drawing lines. Oh, shit, I don't know.
Anybody else want to weigh in here? I hate playing the grownup. They're too much fun to needle.
Offline
#20 2007-11-09 16:22:39
Mayhap we should do the same shit fark did and label NSFW on our posts.... tho I think that would be teh gehy...
Offline
#21 2007-11-09 16:39:24
choad wrote:
Anybody else want to weigh in here? I hate playing the grownup. They're too much fun to needle.
Well, I'm not a lawyer buuuuut...
Personally, I can barely stand to look at the "bleeder" banner--but I don't think it needs to be taken down.
We are most likely to get in trouble over titties, twats, pricks and any and all combinations thereof. We are probably a lot less likely to get complaints about gore. It's stupid but it seems to be the way people's minds work.
HKG, wanna weigh in?
Offline
#22 2007-11-09 16:48:10
Dreadw0lf wrote:
Mayhap we should do the same shit fark did and label NSFW on our posts.... tho I think that would be teh gehy...
Actually, we did that on Cruel and it seemed to work quite well. My old office, though it had four walls and a door, was arranged so someone could glimpse my monitor if they walked far enough into the room. It was handy to know what you were in for when you followed a link. My new office is completely secure, so porn away!!!
Offline
#23 2007-11-09 16:54:45
Say the words "Cruel.Com's Bitter Afterbirth", and people shrug. Maybe they smile. Illustrate those words and we piss away far more than it's worth defending it.
Lewd and nasty is fine but not where it'll assault the unwary. That's not daring, it's dumb and indefensible. The Picture Thread needs a label, at the very least. Every graphic thread needs a subject line that leads with NSFW. If it doesn't have one and should, I've asked all moderators to EDIT ONE IN.
Don't think for a moment I don't realize there's fundamental hypocrisy here. We're stuck with the world we have and our own limited ability to change it.
Offline
#24 2007-11-09 17:12:48
choad wrote:
Don't think for a moment I don't realize there's fundamental hypocrisy here. We're stuck with the world we have and our own limited ability to change it.
Aw, don't get all dee-pressed. It's a simple solution which will protect High-Street from accusations of child-corruption. (Who knows, it might even actually prevent a child or two from being corrupted.) And I wouldn't call an "NSFW" tag even a minor inconvenience.
Offline
#25 2007-11-09 17:23:31
I'm not bummed, George.
This subject has risen before and I really don't want to argue about it anymore, especially when there are so many other more worthy targets.
Offline
#26 2007-11-09 17:55:22
Thanks for the well wishes, guys.
Smoochies!
Offline
#27 2007-11-09 18:02:32
She speaks.
Sister, how art thou?
Offline
#28 2007-11-09 18:08:55
Clearly she busted out in true Sarah-Conner-in-Terminator-2 style and is now on the lam, living exclusively off of donuts and drugs she has stolen from cops.
Offline
#29 2007-11-09 18:12:20
Ahh .. the "bleeder"
Well, if people are objecting then take it down! I am sure we could all do without it. Plus, I added some other ones that aren't as tasteless AND we have what seems to be a never ending supply of new ones as well!
RIP bleeder banner. The look of distress on your face will forever be in our minds.
Last edited by kim (2007-11-09 18:12:52)
Offline
#30 2007-11-09 18:22:29
Dreadw0lf wrote:
Mayhap we should do the same shit fark did and label NSFW on our posts.... tho I think that would be teh gehy...
Ok, you've advertently tripped over one of only a handful of words that deserve an outright ban here. All the rest are equine. From now on, anyone types the word FARK will get something truly obscene in its place.
Offline
#31 2007-11-09 18:24:45
whosasailorthen wrote:
She speaks.
Sister, how art thou?
Crappy.
But this thread made me smile.
Offline
#32 2007-11-09 18:49:01
I agree. Fark in any form = bad.
Especially "Farking" in place of fucking.
teh gay is pretty bad as well. That reminds me more of Scotty though...
Offline
#33 2007-11-09 18:49:34
Jesus Christ Choad, are you super fast admin delete or what?
Offline
#34 2007-11-09 18:52:50
Roger_That wrote:
Jesus Christ Choad, are you super fast admin delete or what?
I'm supposed to do something else this evening and I've run out of excuses. Adios.
Offline
#35 2007-11-09 19:02:49
choad wrote:
Two hours I grunted to excrete something appropriately cruel and SQUAT.
You should've squatted before you started grunting.
Offline
#36 2007-11-10 09:12:22
I've been gone.
What's been happening? Sofa's in distress?
I trust it's not another cervix gone astray.
If it is, who's left for Poor Wilber to breed with?
Also, I think it's a pussy move to remove the bleeder banner,
which is both attractive and apposite. Either this place is
no-holes barred or it isn't. And bad stuff comes out of holes -
blood, snot, shit and babies. What's next on the sanitization schedule?
Can't say nigger? Can't advocate genital mutilation for ditzy nOObs?
It's a slippery slope. (Can I still say "slippery?")
I'd rather see a gate.
Offline
#37 2007-11-10 10:13:13
Slippery slope? Give me a fucking break. You can post almost anything, say almost anything here, and the only requirement is that the front page is PG-13. It isn't arbitrary, it isn't annoying, and it doesn't restrict your ability to do anything in the forum. The banners have been a huge success thanks to choad and orange, and it was a great example of how the community can contribute to the site without leading to chaos. So sit down, shut the fuck up and finish your dinner.
Offline
#38 2007-11-10 10:19:45
tojo2000 wrote:
Slippery slope? Give me a fucking break. You can post almost anything, say almost anything here, and the only requirement is that the front page is PG-13. It isn't arbitrary, it isn't annoying, and it doesn't restrict your ability to do anything in the forum. The banners have been a huge success thanks to choad and orange, and it was a great example of how the community can contribute to the site without leading to chaos. So sit down, shut the fuck up and finish your dinner.
Offline
#39 2007-11-10 10:22:04
tojo2000 wrote:
Slippery slope? Give me a fucking break. You can post almost anything, say almost anything here, and the only requirement is that the front page is PG-13. It isn't arbitrary, it isn't annoying, and it doesn't restrict your ability to do anything in the forum. The banners have been a huge success thanks to choad and orange, and it was a great example of how the community can contribute to the site without leading to chaos. So sit down, shut the fuck up and finish your dinner.
What he said.
Offline
#40 2007-11-10 10:24:24
whosasailorthen wrote:
tojo2000 wrote:
Slippery slope? Give me a fucking break. You can post almost anything, say almost anything here, and the only requirement is that the front page is PG-13. It isn't arbitrary, it isn't annoying, and it doesn't restrict your ability to do anything in the forum. The banners have been a huge success thanks to choad and orange, and it was a great example of how the community can contribute to the site without leading to chaos. So sit down, shut the fuck up and finish your dinner.
What he said.
Follower.
Offline
#41 2007-11-10 12:00:24
I gotta agree with Tojo on this. As much as I think bloody shit and all that is great, it would severly limit my surfing abilities from work. It's not that I *can't* load that shit, it's just that it would really suck if my boss came by and I had a page up with some bloody abortion on it....
hmm.
Offline
#42 2007-11-10 12:13:54
Roger_That wrote:
I gotta agree with Tojo on this. As much as I think bloody shit and all that is great, it would severly limit my surfing abilities from work. It's not that I *can't* load that shit, it's just that it would really suck if my boss came by and I had a page up with some bloody abortion on it....
hmm.
All right all ready. I retract both my statement and my foreskin. I was traumatized by a prude as a child, and anything that looks even vaguely like giving in to demands for "decency" makes me shit my...damn...gotta go.
Offline
#43 2007-11-10 16:18:51
Sofie. I've been away, didn't know you were down and out. Sorry. Get well. I'll smoke a doob for ya tonight.
Offline