#1 2008-02-28 16:05:23
If you can handle reading a few paragraphs into this, there are quite a few gems in there.
http://www.freewebs.com/onecolor/
I always wish that there are no laws about clothes, school, death sentence and even with insects or animals as pest control, drugs and liquors but I don't use them, etc. I may continue to eat any kind of foods but it is better to eat only fishes because I think that all fishes mayb allow me eat them as they eat some smaller fishes too as sharing in the food chain. If I eat a cow then it may not be fair because a cow may not eat an animal but hay from the farmers. That is why cows may boycott against us and tell us that they are not participate in the food chains of killing each others like a boxing game. Some people may still eat meat from resturant and they don't kill them themselves but for the best interest, they must learn to not to eat cows so farmers cannot kill cows for money.
And don't miss the illustrations at the bottom!
Last edited by Roger_That (2008-02-28 16:06:43)
Offline
#2 2008-02-28 17:08:19
That is some serious Crazy.
It is better to feel numbness alone than having a pleasure plus tiny pain.
Um, ok.
Offline
#3 2008-02-28 17:23:20
Thank God this fucker is deaf and can't speak.
Offline
#4 2008-02-28 18:46:54
You forgot to mention thank god he's sterile.
Offline
#5 2008-02-28 23:17:00
Kathaksung-in-training.
Offline
#6 2008-02-29 08:08:21
Perhaps we should introduce them. I think Kathaksung could learn something. The force is strong with this one...
Offline
#7 2008-02-29 11:43:18
Do we have a word limit on posts Choad? Can we send an invite to Kathaksung?
Offline
#8 2008-02-29 12:57:40
HAH. Well if you are going to invite Kathaksung, you might as well invite the owner of the above website:
Jonttt@gmail.com
Offline
#9 2008-02-29 13:46:52
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
Do we have a word limit on posts Choad? Can we send an invite to Kathaksung?
How 'bout a 3 topic post limit, that work for you?
That was a joke, rcade...
Offline
#10 2008-02-29 14:05:34
I do miss ole Kathy, sometimes.
But it's not like his peculiar wisdom isn't readily available via a quick Google search.
Offline
#11 2008-02-29 14:17:01
George Orr wrote:
I do miss ole Kathy, sometimes.
But it's not like his peculiar wisdom isn't readily available via a quick Google search.
Yes, but you don't get the same homey feeling you get when he posts it here for us. Kinda makes you feel a little more special, knowwhatImean?
Offline
#12 2008-02-29 15:04:41
Roger_That wrote:
Kinda makes you feel a little more special, knowwhatImean?
I particularly miss how fnord (and I think a few others) would counsel Kathy on how to thwart surveillance by the DEA, FBI et al., or how he had just used a secret key word and--right that very minute--they were at his door!!
Offline
#13 2008-02-29 15:07:09
George Orr wrote:
I particularly miss how fnord (and I think a few others) would counsel Kathy on how to thwart surveillance by the DEA, FBI et al., or how he had just used a secret key word and--right that very minute--they were at his door!!
Ahhh yes, pining for the days of yore yet again...
Last edited by Roger_That (2008-02-29 15:09:54)
Offline
#14 2008-02-29 15:12:43
Looks like Kathy has finally been immortalized in Urban Dictionary:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p … kathaksung
Offline
#15 2008-03-02 19:00:45
Here's a love interest for kathaksung -- an Oscar winner, even. That is, if they haven't gotten him first.
Offline
#16 2008-03-02 19:11:52
square wrote:
Here's a love interest for kathaksung -- an Oscar winner, even. That is, if they haven't gotten him first.
You did see that gawd-awful dress she wore to the oscars, right?
What else would you expect? Besides, she's a fucking frog...
Offline
#17 2008-03-02 19:44:56
square wrote:
Here's a love interest for kathaksung -- an Oscar winner, even. That is, if they haven't gotten him first.
We are lied to about everything as a matter of course. Would you rather live in a nation of docil drones, of sheeple? Oh, wait.
Everyone on the staff of the weekly I published in the mid 70s was convinced their phones were tapped, and their every move monitored by agents of the state. They fearfully passed along dog-earred mimeo samisdat detailing the international conspiracy about to crush us all. Anyone remember the Gemstone Papers?
They had imagination, what did I care? We -are- ruled by ruthless dickwads. Does it matter whether we ever prove their crimes? Right, just because you're 'noid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.
Offline
#18 2008-03-02 19:56:49
Lurker wrote:
You did see that gawd-awful dress she wore to the oscars, right?
Actually I hadn't, before you mentioned it. Hearing her singing on the radio gave me a chubby, though.
Ehh, I've seen worse fashion disasters. Maybe you can lure Pale back for a fuller critique.
Last edited by square (2008-03-02 20:00:44)
Offline
#19 2010-01-06 14:50:38
Nigerian attempted aircraft bombing case
So said "terrorist" used an advanced technology which for most of us have never heard of. It must be some technique went through a lot of lab tests. How could they fail at last procedure like the former "shoe bomber" case? Or the terrorists use some unskillful technique like it was a firework game?
Or most likely some group want to create a terror atmosphere to request more money for their operating fund or ask for more power? Or just a psychological preparation for a bigger coming terror "attack"?
The real flaw is: In both the Shoe bomber case and this Nigerian case, the bomber could go to the toilet room to do their jobs without any disturb. If failed, they could have left without trouble. But they chose to do it in public and both failed. It looked more like a planed show rather then a real plot. Do you think they and their leader are idiots? When in 9/11 the four planes drove so accurately to hit their targets by inexperienced flight school students who had never had the experience to pilot big planes like Boeing and no one missing a bit, is that too strange they failed in such a simple case, repeated same error?
Offline
#20 2010-01-06 18:31:53
That's the worst case of cauliflower tits I've ever seen.
Last edited by bezoar_d'coeur (2010-01-06 18:32:53)
Offline
#21 2010-01-07 02:32:47
THIS Is the real RT. I didn't start this topic nor post on any of it. Unless my brain has really gone down the shitter. I never use the HTML formatting, or italics.
Shit. wtf????
Who's logging in on my account??????????????
Offline
#22 2010-01-07 02:44:46
Roger_That wrote:
THIS Is the real RT. I didn't start this topic nor post on any of it. Unless my brain has really gone down the shitter. I never use the HTML formatting, or italics.
Shit. wtf????
Who's logging in on my account??????????????
SO what drugs have you been using lately?
Offline
#23 2010-01-07 03:07:34
Roger_That wrote:
THIS Is the real RT. I didn't start this topic nor post on any of it. Unless my brain has really gone down the shitter. I never use the HTML formatting, or italics.
Shit. wtf????
Who's logging in on my account??????????????
You did notice this thread was started almost two years ago? I couldn't tell you off the top of my head what I posted that month.
Offline
#24 2010-01-07 13:46:26
Yay, kathy's back! This seriously makes my day.
Offline
#25 2010-01-07 14:20:46
HAHA Fnord, no I didn't. And I've been on various things. Some of which are very, very nice to my brain.
Offline
#26 2010-01-07 21:09:45
I'm sure there's some arcane reasoning behind kathaksung choosing this 2 year old thread to post on, but I think he's developing a sense of humor.
Offline
