#2 2009-11-03 15:47:27

I'll just skip that one....

Offline

 

#3 2009-11-03 18:07:47

Agreed. Thanks for the warning. I can leave that link a virgin.

Offline

 

#4 2009-11-03 18:26:16

wow

Offline

 

#5 2009-11-03 22:05:25

And this brings fnord up to eight posts on the current front page, blowing away sofaking and Dmtdust with three apiece, and several others with just one.

Offline

 

#6 2009-11-03 22:15:36

Hmm... so it was a little girl.

Interesting to run the film backwards and watch our abortionist stuff it back in.

Offline

 

#7 2011-05-10 03:42:51

sorry but it is awfull, bad cialis impressions..

Last edited by Benet_ (2011-05-16 16:50:37)

Offline

 

#8 2011-05-11 00:55:11

Just because it doesn't seem appealing on an emotional level and we attribute anthropomorphic qualities to fetuses doesn't change the facts.  Those little chunks of flesh being pulled out haven't achieved consciousness and unlike the myths our parents told us probably won't become a great scientist or the president (as if that's anything special).  If people do in fact own their own bodies and can choose what to do with them, then it is nothing more than an intruder and a parasite.  Yes, it is kind of disturbing seeing blood and pseudo-human features being pulled out in parts, but that's a psychological reaction outside of the realm of reason.  Anybody who uses footage like this in an attempt to deny another person their right of self-ownership is a useless piece of shit.

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com