#1 2019-12-10 19:40:34

This, oh yes, this:

Offline

 

#2 2019-12-11 10:26:51

Honestly, I'm sickened by both sides in this assassination by whispering campaign.

And I also can't stand opionists that say "this guy has a 1 minute blurb" and then never playing more than 3 seconds at a time so they can ridicule it. When he got to the hypocrisy of calling the testifier a partisan, I just shut it off.

It should go to the Supreme Court at this point to rule on if a sitting president and his cabinet and campaign staff needs to respond to subpoenas from congress. Then, if it is decided if they must, then they can move forward. But issuing requests to provide evidence without the basis to do so, then damning them if they do not is just posturing.

What we need is a little sunshine in the form of a full publication of all of the report of impeachment listing names and dates and places and quoting all of the players. I think that it's worth it to the American people to get the whole (such as it is) story, but I ain't holding my breath for that.

Offline

 

#3 2019-12-11 12:27:41

Liars pay liars to lie.  We don't need the SCotUS to tell us that the congress has the right by Constitutional intent to impeach at will.  Both sides are corrupt and I now mainly aim to disrupt.

But seriously the SCotUS has no say in this matter other than to restate the letter of the law, we don't need their opinion particularly if that opinion is loaded in favor of one side or the other.

Offline

 

#4 2019-12-11 17:44:52

SpacePuppy wrote:

This, oh yes, this:

Tough crowd here, ain't it?

You guys are terrific!

Offline

 

#5 2019-12-11 18:38:51

GooberMcNutly wrote:

Honestly, I'm sickened by both sides in this assassination by whispering campaign.

And I also can't stand opionists that say "this guy has a 1 minute blurb" and then never playing more than 3 seconds at a time so they can ridicule it. When he got to the hypocrisy of calling the testifier a partisan, I just shut it off.

1. Don't forget, this is Comedy.  Sick Political Comedy, but comedy just the same.
2. He said he would take the 1 minute statement apart.  He did that.  You should of turned it off then, and you missed all of the best bits.
3. The hack he was reviewing is partisan. What is wrong with calling a dog a bitch if it is female, a cur, if a male?

Just sayin'
https://i0.wp.com/dbdailyupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/impeachment-circus-meme.jpg?fit=537%2C500&ssl=1

Offline

 

#6 2019-12-11 23:11:41

Emmeran wrote:

Liars pay liars to lie.  We don't need the SCotUS to tell us that the congress has the right by Constitutional intent to impeach at will.  Both sides are corrupt and I now mainly aim to disrupt.

But seriously the SCotUS has no say in this matter other than to restate the letter of the law, we don't need their opinion particularly if that opinion is loaded in favor of one side or the other.

One of the greatest things our Founding Fathers ever done for us was set up the House of Representatives to be a bat-shit crazy entity, regardless of who's in charge, with Constitutionally protected broad powers and (probably) free rum coupons.

Offline

 

#7 2019-12-12 06:33:07

The take down may be good rhetoric, but pretty much misses the legal issues.  As comedy, it makes me yawn.

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com