#251 2025-05-26 08:47:42
"What the hell happened to Putin?"
Nothing, you ignorant orange fuck. This is who he's always been.
Offline
#252 2025-05-26 14:57:29
BorderCountess wrote:
"What the hell happened to Putin?"
Nothing, you ignorant orange fuck. This is who he's always been.
Well said.
Offline
#253 2025-05-26 15:02:01
https://newsthump.com/2025/02/05/golf-c … -briefing/
Last edited by Fled (2025-05-31 17:31:40)
Offline
#254 2025-05-28 16:09:10
Wall Street investors have cooked up a new term for betting against President Donald Trump ― and some have used it to score big gains at a time when the markets are behaving erratically due to the president’s on-again, off-again tariffs.
It’s called “TACO,” which is code for “Trump Always Chickens Out,” and it refers to the president’s tendency to announce massive tariffs, causing the markets to plunge, only to back off days later, causing them to rise again.
Analysts said the situation is unique to Trump.
“Under no previous presidency did we have active markets betting on the president’s resolve,” University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers told Barron’s. “There was no BACO trade, no CACO trade, nothing. It was always taken as a given that when the president spoke on Monday, he would likely still mean it on Tuesday. That’s no longer true. But what’s really hard is that it’s not even obvious when it’ll be true, and when it won’t be. Madness.”
Armstrong, the writer who coined the term, had his own tongue-in-cheek takeaway.
“Acronyms are very powerful, especially when they remind people of foodstuffs,” he said on the “Unhedged” podcast. “That is what I’ve learned from this experience.”
You too can become a tool!
Buy the dip: the trend that keeps stocks from crashing
Retail investors now play a useful role at times of panic
Offline
#255 2025-05-29 10:54:31
Offline
#256 2025-05-29 17:15:59
I'm starting to think Trump might not be any good at this whole 'trade agreement' thing.
Offline
#257 2025-05-29 18:28:31
#258 2025-05-29 21:08:39
He must have watched the original Blues Brothers movie last night.
Offline
#259 2025-05-30 00:31:32
BorderCountess wrote:
I'm starting to think Trump might not be any good at this whole 'trade agreement' thing.
Sure he is, he knows just who is against him.
Just look at the length and the detail in his explanation of what is needed now.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
The U.S. Court of International Trade incredibly ruled against the United States of America on desperately needed Tariffs but, fortunately, the full 11 Judge Panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Court has just stayed the order by the Manhattan-based Court of International Trade. Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of “TRUMP?” What other reason could it be? I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges. I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real “sleazebag” named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions. He openly brags how he controls Judges, and even Justices of the United States Supreme Court — I hope that is not so, and don’t believe it is! In any event, Leo left The Federalist Society to do his own “thing.” I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations. This is something that cannot be forgotten! With all of that being said, I am very proud of many of our picks, but very disappointed in others. They always must do what’s right for the Country! In this case, it is only because of my successful use of Tariffs that many Trillions of Dollars have already begun pouring into the U.S.A. from other Countries, money that, without these Tariffs, we would not be able to get. It is the difference between having a rich, prosperous, and successful United States of America, and quite the opposite. The ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade is so wrong, and so political! Hopefully, the Supreme Court will reverse this horrible, Country threatening decision, QUICKLY and DECISIVELY. Backroom “hustlers” must not be allowed to destroy our Nation! The horrific decision stated that I would have to get the approval of Congress for these Tariffs. In other words, hundreds of politicians would sit around D.C. for weeks, and even months, trying to come to a conclusion as to what to charge other Countries that are treating us unfairly. If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power — The Presidency would never be the same! This decision is being hailed all over the World by every Country, other than the United States of America. Radical Left Judges, together with some very bad people, are destroying America. Under this decision, Trillions of Dollars would be lost by our Country, money that will, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. It would be the harshest financial ruling ever leveled on us as a Sovereign Nation. The President of the United States must be allowed to protect America against those that are doing it Economic and Financial harm. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
May 29, 2025, 8:10 PM
Offline
#260 2025-05-30 07:38:05
That's a lot of words for, "...waaah! Judges won't let me be a king!"
Also, has anyone else noticed how much he now uses the sentence, "Thank you for your attention to this matter!" That's something you copy/paste at the end of an email...
Offline
#261 2025-05-31 10:14:12
#262 2025-06-03 11:02:56
And speaking of Donald's TACO moments, we approach another one.
Putin didn’t budge in Ukraine peace talks. Now Donald Trump may be forced to act
Analysis by Matthew Chance, Chief Global Affairs Correspondent
Updated: 10:46 AM EDT, Tue June 3, 2025
Source: CNN
See Full Web Article
So, Russia and Ukraine are still as far apart as ever, with the two warring countries unable to make a significant breakthrough in direct talks in Istanbul.
While there was agreement to exchange more prisoners, Moscow and Kyiv remain deeply divided over how to bring the costly and bitter Ukraine war to an end.
Russia has shown itself to be particularly uncompromising, handing Ukrainian negotiators a memorandum re-stating its maximalist, hardline terms which would essentially amount to a Ukrainian surrender.
Expectations were always low for a Kremlin compromise. But Moscow appears to have eliminated any hint of a readiness to soften its demands.
The Russian memorandum again calls on Ukraine to withdraw from four partially occupied regions that Russia has annexed but not captured: a territorial concession that Kyiv has repeatedly rejected.
It says Ukraine must accept strict limits on its armed forces, never join a military alliance, host foreign troops or aquire nuclear weapons. It would be Ukrainian demilitarization in its most hardline form, unpalatable to Ukraine and much of Europe, which sees the country as a barrier against further Russian expansion.
Other Russian demands include the restoration of full diplomatic and economic ties, specifically that no reparations will be demanded by either side and that all Western sanctions on Russia be lifted.
It is a Kremlin wish-list that, while familiar, speaks volumes about how Moscow continues to imagine the future of Ukraine as a subjugated state in the thrall of Russia, with no significant military of its own nor real independence.
Dmitry Medvedev, Russia’s hawkish former president and prime minister who is now a top security official, said outright on Tuesday that Moscow’s goal in the peace talks is not to “compromise,” but to achieve a “speedy victory.” He said this was the “meaning” of Russia’s memorandum.
This uncompromising position comes despite two important factors which may have given the Kremlin pause.
Firstly, Ukraine has developed the technical capability to strike deep inside Russia, despite its staggering disparity of territory and resources. The stunning drone strikes recently targeting Russian strategic bombers at bases thousands of miles from Ukraine is a powerful illustration of that. Ukraine, it seems, has some cards after all, and is using them effectively.
Secondly – and arguably more dangerously for Moscow – the Kremlin’s latest hardline demands come despite US President Donald Trump’s increasing frustrations with his own Ukraine peace efforts.
Trump has already expressed annoyance with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, who he said had gone “absolutely MAD” after massive Russian strikes on Ukraine last week.
But now, Trump himself is under pressure as a cornerstone of his second term foreign policy – bringing a rapid end the Ukraine war – looks decidedly shaky.
There are powerful levers to pull if Trump chooses, like increasing US military aid or imposing tough new sanctions, such as those overwhelmingly supported in the US Senate. One of the key backers of a cross-party senate bill that aims to impose “crippling” new measures on Moscow, Senator Richard Blumenthal, accused Russia of “mocking peace efforts” at the Istanbul talks and in a carefully worded post on X accused the Kremlin of “playing Trump and America for fools.”
It is unclear at the moment how the mercurial US president will react, or what – if anything – he will do.
But the outcome of the Ukraine war, specifically the brokering of peace deal to end it, has become inextricably linked with the current administration in the White House.
The fact that Putin has once again dug in his heels and presented an uncompromising response to calls for peace, may now force Trump to act.
Offline
#263 2025-06-03 16:39:03
I'm especially amused that Ukraine didn't tell Trump about its drone attack because they were worried he'd tip off Putin.
Offline
#264 2025-06-04 21:18:29
#265 2025-06-05 01:37:08
The very idea that someone could be pardoned beyond his means to persecute and leverage them really got his goat. Fealty must be maintained at all costs. If only there was a way to undue those damn pardons? Why but of course there must be a way, we didn't spend all this time conditioning acceptance of our fake news for nothing.
Offline
#266 2025-06-05 08:57:42
"Cognitive decline". Well, that is something the President knows a great deal about.
Offline
#267 2025-06-05 11:42:57
#268 2025-06-05 19:02:06
Baywolfe wrote:
"Cognitive decline". Well, that is something the President knows a great deal about.
Do Republicans really want to open this can of worms? Because James "Partisan Attack Dog" Comer is now trying to subpoena Biden's physician.
Offline
#269 2025-06-05 21:59:52
BorderCountess wrote:
Baywolfe wrote:
"Cognitive decline". Well, that is something the President knows a great deal about.
Do Republicans really want to open this can of worms? Because James "Partisan Attack Dog" Comer is now trying to subpoena Biden's physician.
Right now they think they are untouchable.
Offline
#270 2025-06-13 04:29:03
So much for Trump's claim that wars don't start on his watch.
Offline
#271 2025-06-14 19:05:30
More proof that the only thing Trump has ever been able to sell successfully is himself:
https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/14/business … -licensing
Offline
#272 Yesterday 11:14:03
Tariff Free Tele For You!
AVAILABLE FOR PRE-ORDER NOW!
Get ready to experience the power of TrumpSM Mobile. Our MADE IN THE USA “T1SM Phone” is available for pre-order now. Reserve your phone TODAY!! The “T1SM Phone” will be available in September 2025
"This latest move raises more questions than answers. As always the devil is in the detail given that it is unclear around the actual commercial relationship with the telecom players and so forth," said Paolo Pescatore, TMT analyst at PP Foresight.
Offline
#273 Yesterday 20:19:40
Offline
#274 Today 08:22:22
Fake women for fake politics. They can't get the ugly out of their eyes to save their lives.
Offline
#275 Today 12:13:09
There was some hope for Kimberly and Lara, but that is gone now.
Offline
#276 Today 13:19:23
Hegseth deploys more active duty troops stateside.
https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/R … ve-and-lo/
Offline
#277 Today 14:21:14
Americans cut back sharply on their spending last month amid tariffs
By Bryan Mena, CNN
Updated: 9:23 AM EDT, Tue June 17, 2025
Source: CNN
See Full Web Article
Americans are feeling a hangover from their tariff-fueled buying frenzy early in the spring.
Retail sales fell by 0.9% in May from the prior month, the Commerce Department said Tuesday, down sharply from April’s downwardly revised 0.1% decline. That was the steepest monthly decline since January and worse than the 0.7% decrease economists projected in a poll by data firm FactSet.
The figures are adjusted for seasonal swings but not inflation.
The drop was mostly due to plummeting car sales. Excluding those purchases, retail sales were down a more modest 0.3%.
Early in the spring, Americans rushed to front-load purchases of big-ticket items, especially cars, to beat President Donald Trump’s stiff tariffs. That sent retail sales surging in March, but spending has downshifted markedly since then.
May’s report adds to evidence that Americans are becoming cautious with their spending, which could reverberate throughout the economy if it persists.
“Any time you get a pullback in consumer spending, it tends to lead to a slowdown in overall GDP and broader economic activity, which feeds in to slower sales, hiring and in turn slower income growth,” Gregory Daco, chief economist at Ernst & Young, told CNN’s Matt Egan in an interview.
“The real risk is we have the onset of a more pronounced slowdown in the economy, driven not necessarily by the actual tariffs but instead by a surge in anxiety that led to a front-loading in demand and will now lead to a demand cliff.”
Details from the report
Retail spending was down across most categories last month, especially at car dealerships. Car and auto parts sales declined 3.5% in May, the biggest monthly decline since June 2024.
Sales last month were also down sharply at gasoline stations — mostly due to falling energy prices — and at home improvement stores, declining 2% and 2.7%, respectively.
Meanwhile, spending at bars and restaurants declined 0.9% in May, the first monthly decline since February and the steepest one since February 2023. Whenever consumers cut back, discretionary spending, such as eating out at restaurants, is usually first on the chopping block.
Sales in May were up at specialty stores and online.
More economic weakness ahead?
Consumer spending is the lifeblood of the US economy, and its trajectory from here out largely depends on what happens with the labor market.
“Consumers are on the sidelines as the job market weakens and Americans grapple with higher prices,” David Russell, global head of market strategy at TradeStation, said in analyst note Tuesday. “It could be a pause before confidence rebounds, or a warning before a broader slowdown.”
For now, the labor market is holding steady, with unemployment at a low 4.2% and employers still adding jobs at a brisk pace, according to Labor Department data. If the US economy begins to shed jobs and unemployment starts to climb, spending data would very likely weaken as Americans who are out of a job hunker down, economists say.
The sheer uncertainty sowed by the Trump administration has been clear across various consumer surveys for months now. Sentiment hasn’t been a good predictor of future spending behavior in recent years, but now there may be signs in the so-called “hard data” — figures that capture actual economic activity — of pessimism finally affecting spending behavior.
“The economy is slowing with consumers nervous about exactly what lies ahead and are choosing to save overall rather than flash some cash at the shops and malls,” Chris Rupkey, chief economist at Fwdbonds, said in commentary issued Tuesday.
“This is not an economic report that exudes confidence in the future, even if the economy is likely to miss a recession for now,” he said.
Offline
#278 Today 14:23:15
MSG Tripps wrote:
Hegseth deploys more active duty troops stateside.
https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/R … ve-and-lo/
These service members, drawn from all components and operating in a Title 10 duty status, will provide logistical support, and conduct administrative and clerical functions associated with the processing of illegal aliens at ICE detention facilities. They will not directly participate in law enforcement activities.
Isn't that how Vietnam started?
Offline