#2 2008-09-16 16:45:50
That doesn't surprise me. Kim Elton, one of the targets they're trying to remove, is a sensible and level-headed legislator. He's been the subject of similar idiocies like this in the past.
Offline
#3 2008-09-16 16:54:52
Offline
#4 2008-09-17 00:54:37
This was listed as a related vid, tho I was actually looking for an elephant shitting.
Offline
#5 2008-09-17 03:46:25
If I believed in Hell, I would hope that there's a special corner reserved for tormenting those who feel the need to attach the "-gate" suffix to any scandal.
Offline
#6 2008-09-17 03:48:15
Scandalous, isn't it? We can call it Gategate.
Offline
#7 2008-09-17 03:54:28
tojo2000 wrote:
Scandalous, isn't it? We can call it Gategate.
God, I can just see the uproar over a stunt like that: we'll have to call it Gategategate.
Offline
#8 2008-09-17 09:43:26
square wrote:
If I believed in Hell, I would hope that there's a special corner reserved for tormenting those who feel the need to attach the "-gate" suffix to any scandal.
It's in its fourth decade, so I think it's here to stay.
Offline
#9 2008-09-17 12:14:37
square wrote:
If I believed in Hell, I would hope that there's a special corner reserved for tormenting those who feel the need to attach the "-gate" suffix to any scandal.
Especially when it's a hat. TrooperGate was already taken by Clinton.
Offline
#10 2008-09-17 14:15:30
Zookeeper wrote:
square wrote:
If I believed in Hell, I would hope that there's a special corner reserved for tormenting those who feel the need to attach the "-gate" suffix to any scandal.
Especially when it's a hat. TrooperGate was already taken by Clinton.
lol, I was thinking that myself but wasn't sure! Thanks for clarifying.
Someone should send the authorities in Alaska all asshats!!
Offline
#11 2008-09-17 20:14:24
Offline
#12 2008-09-18 00:11:01
Woops.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/18 … stigation/
I think Anonymous will soon be not.
Oh, snap.
Offline
#13 2008-09-18 13:01:43
whosasailorthen wrote:
I think Anonymous will soon be not.
It's their own dumb fault for posting the URL in their screenshots. Big whoops.
Offline
#14 2008-09-19 01:10:53
pALEPHx wrote:
whosasailorthen wrote:
I think Anonymous will soon be not.
It's their own dumb fault for posting the URL in their screenshots. Big whoops.
Yep. In "4chan speak"... Epic Fail.
Offline
#15 2008-09-19 01:13:40
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by tojo2000 (2008-09-19 01:13:54)
Offline
#16 2008-09-19 01:27:25
whosasailorthen wrote:
I think Anonymous will soon be not.
But...they are Anonymous! They are everywhere; they cannot die; they are forever!
They said so!
Offline
