ptah13 wrote:

C'mon man.

She's hot. If she was a liberal you'd love her.

If she was a liberal who was just as ignorant as she is now, then I'd fucking HATE her for making libs look worse than they do already.

In fact, let's just come right out and say the obvious: Palin is nothing more than a white/conservative Cynthia McKinney.

Last edited by jesusluvspegging (2008-10-22 00:49:19)

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Palin is nothing more than a white/conservative Cynthia McKinney.

I'm going to use that in the real world, where nobody knows I didn't come up with it.

A couple, from me to you:

Obama is the Jackie Robinson of politics. If he responded to any of the attacks (see esp. last debate), he would be the Angry Black Man. Hence, cool as ice.

McCain, for all his negativism, never played the 9/11 card like Bush did. Remember the wolves attacking you commercial? That's onething to respect him for in the last month.

Horseonovich wrote:

ah297900 wrote:

A couple, from me to you:

Obama is the Jackie Robinson of politics. If he responded to any of the attacks (see esp. last debate), he would be the Angry Black Man. Hence, cool as ice.

You mean this cool?

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews1604.html

(Phreddy, ptah, other conservative cunts:  I love you like half-brothers from daddy's previous marriage to a festering cock-whore.  But this time, well, this time yer not gonna be able to wriggle your way out of this with ersatz Word Gift.  The times, they are a'chagnin, bitches.  Flow with it or sink.  Nuff sed)

Horseonovich wrote:

ah297900 wrote:

A couple, from me to you:

Obama is the Jackie Robinson of politics. If he responded to any of the attacks (see esp. last debate), he would be the Angry Black Man. Hence, cool as ice.

You mean this cool?

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews1604.html

and is tied among NASCAR fans.

GooberMcNutly wrote:

I just think that if they picked on someones race the way they pick on Palins sex, there would be rioting in the streets. If they used Ebonics instead of "Don'tcha know" every 10 seconds, you would have to call out the national guard.

The truth is, everybody is focused on Palin because she is the first new thing in politics in a very long time. Who wants to hear the same old stale politician or lawyer jokes. And how could you say anything funny about Biden, that lump of unanimated clay? Palin is the only candidate not either a career politician or a lawyer, so the electorate doesn't have a handle to grab her by.

Are we really going to spend the last weeks of this election talking about the Vice Presidential candidate? How about the shitstorm in the financial markets? How about how our currency is actually coming back up for a change? How about the end of the big 3 automakers in this country? How about how Iran saying the only way they will talk to us is if we leave the mid-east entirely and stop supporting Israel?

If that's all the liberals have in their game books, making fun of verbal mannerisms of someone who hasn't been buffed and fluffed for years in the political machine until they sound like a robot with a smooth answer for everything, then you deserve the stuffed suit you get.

Do you see any way that Palin might be construed as less than prepared for national executive office? If not, what would someone in over their head look like?

Dmtdust wrote:

Her Personal Dresser: http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200810u/palin-clothes

So these are technically horses, not donkeys.  Regardless:

karenw wrote:

GooberMcNutly wrote:

I just think that if they picked on someones race the way they pick on Palins sex, there would be rioting in the streets. If they used Ebonics instead of "Don'tcha know" every 10 seconds, you would have to call out the national guard.

I don't think men can speak to sexism in this case. I'm a politically active woman, and I don't see the treatment of Palin as sexist. It kills me that a bunch of middle-aged white men are suddenly concerned about women's issues. Answer me this: why is it that critiquing Palin is unfair to women but dictating what I can do with my uterus is OK?

As for the faux "Fargo" accent, it's fun to laugh at because it's so obviously contrived.

I don't think anyone is being sexist, either, but the fact still remains that if Obama was treated the same as Palin there would be cries of racism and rioting in the streets.

I would still wager that if Obama loses, riots will ensue. Maybe no Rodney King-level, but more widespread. Hey, if they riot in Detroit when their basketball team WINS the championship, people will riot if Obama loses. Especially since they've been told, for weeks now, that it is all but a formality now as it is in the bag.

karenw wrote:

Answer me this: why is it that critiquing Palin is unfair to women but dictating what I can do with my uterus is OK?

Well, mainly because as males we are predictably single minded, to the point that we are always more interested in your uterus than anything else save your teats.  As males we have learned from an early age that protecting your image and defending you from perceived slights is a sure fire way to gain access to your teats and uterus.

All that being said, can I have access to your uterus now?

ptah13 wrote:

I would still wager that if Obama loses, riots will ensue. Maybe no Rodney King-level, but more widespread. Hey, if they riot in Detroit when their basketball team WINS the championship, people will riot if Obama loses. Especially since they've been told, for weeks now, that it is all but a formality now as it is in the bag.

At this point if Obama loses rioting in the streets is probably the accurate response.  This one is done; tag it, bag it and let's get on with business.

Dmtdust wrote:

And don't get me going about agent provocateurs...

Not sure what I'm supposed to be looking at here or, for that matter, why this thread is still going (all purpose election sticky thread time?).

Is ptah saying Obama hasn't been scrutinized? I'd say the Ayers thing counts for scrutiny, considering McCain's relationship with Keating and the (appropriate) lack of talk about that. Or is it the slurs thrown only at Palin, like socialist, terrorist, un-American, etc. Obama's getting a major dump taken on him--let's not pretend this is a free pass.

Oh--and what are the arrows pointing out to me? Are those steel-toed boots or something?

Last edited by ah297900 (2008-10-22 20:54:35)

ah297900 wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

And don't get me going about agent provocateurs...

Not sure what I'm supposed to be looking at here or, for that matter, why this thread is still going (all purpose election sticky thread time?).

Is ptah saying Obama hasn't been scrutinized? I'd say the Ayers thing counts for scrutiny, considering McCain's relationship with Keating and the (appropriate) lack of talk about that. Or is it the slurs thrown only at Palin, like socialist, terrorist, un-American, etc. Obama's getting a major dump taken on him--let's not pretend this is a free pass.

Oh--and what are the arrows pointing out to me? Are those steel-toed boots or something?

Common Practice: Your Agents have to have some sign on them that they are who they are, and not the intended victims of Police atrocities.  They have the same marks on the bottom of their shoes.  This has been used for years.

Check the asshole with the red tape...

Dmtdust wrote:

And don't get me going about agent provocateurs...
They have the same marks on the bottom of their shoes.  This has been used for years.

Check the asshole with the red tape...

Wait, a military training video and a video with more media than protesters . . . so what is your point?

We did training exercises complete with vids all the time when I was a Jarhead, and that was back in the 80's and 90's; I agree we shouldn't use combat troops for these incidents, but if we are the training is essential.


(and frankly the red tape on the back and sides looks more like a media provacateur then anything else... here!!! Film him!!!!  He's going to force the issue and give you some really good segments.

Sorry - first play I had the audio off - I missed the queued statments of "He's not media" and "we've never seen that guy before"


Gee, wonder what a riot clip is worth to cable TV these days....

Last edited by Emmeran (2008-10-22 21:34:13)

ah297900 wrote:

GooberMcNutly wrote:

If that's all the liberals have in their game books, making fun of verbal mannerisms of someone who hasn't been buffed and fluffed for years in the political machine until they sound like a robot with a smooth answer for everything, then you deserve the stuffed suit you get.

Do you see any way that Palin might be construed as less than prepared for national executive office? If not, what would someone in over their head look like?

I see lots of ways that she wouldn't be ready to run the country. But she has about as much national and international experience as either Obama or Bill Clinton. But you seem to have forgotten that she isn't running for President. She is running as the VP. McCain on the other hand has tons of national and international leadership experience. And he IS running for President, don'tcha know.

ah297900 wrote:

This is going to sound insulting (to you) but it's not intended to be:

There will be none of that around here, poop.  No sparing of feelings, and absolutely no apologizing on High Street.

ah297900 wrote:

jesusluvspegging wrote:

ah297900 wrote:

This is going to sound insulting (to you) but it's not intended to be:

There will be none of that around here, poop.  No sparing of feelings, and absolutely no apologizing on High Street.

Eat a dick up until you hiccup, Jesus. And don't interrupt me--I think I was getting through to him.

Better.

BS.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.h … A9639C8B63

I had friends seriously hurt/ and acquaintances killed due to the actions of these dicks.  I remember it pretty damn well.

Do you really think people will go tit for tat for the last 8 years of misbehaviour?  I would pray not.

phreddy wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

I had friends seriously hurt/ and acquaintances killed due to the actions of these dicks.  I remember it pretty damn well.

Agreed, but just remember, absolute power corrupts absolutely.  It can cut both ways.  Don't put it past Obama and a friendly Congress to launch into a bizarro world of political correctness.  If liberal students in universities can shout down and ban free speech, so can elected officials.  As the Who so aptly put it "..get down on our knees and pray we don't get fooled again."

That is what cracks me up.

You didn't see some wack-job conservative interrupting Obamas DNC acceptance speech. I don't think the idea ever even occurred to the RNC to plant folks in the crowd to disrupt the DNC speech.

Win at all costs, I guess. The level of class in our political processes has been in steady decline since those hillbillies from Arkansas were in the white house in the 90's.

Of course you liked it.

ptah13 wrote:

Win at all costs, I guess. The level of class in our political processes has been in steady decline since those hillbillies from Arkansas were in the white house in the 90's.

Odd that you don't see the head of the CIA ascending to the Presidency as problematic.

I thought he was a good president too - had at least been productive with his life.  More than I can say for his son or McCain.


My stance:  No more spoiled brats or family members.  We need an amendment, pronto!

Emmeran wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9905E5D91430F931A15751C1A9639C8B63

Read carefully Dusty, I didn't disparage your remarks - I merely noted that your choice of examples was lame.  Find a better image search engine.

Duly noted Em.   All the pics I had located earlier went bye bye in the last few months.

Cheers in Solidarity,

D