Think of the gay puppies!

Ah, my beloved native land.

ah297900 wrote:

This is grotesque. It's the "protect our definition of marriage" thing, but without the veneer of protecting anything or anybody. But, at least the orphans will have to pay for people's inability to deal with dudes fucking. Next: no more free school lunches because, uhh, lesbians and shit.

And the gay agenda? As far as I can tell, it's "let us alone."

*rubs hands together* Heh, heh. We've hoodwinked another sucker.

tojo2000 wrote:

Watch out achoo!  One second you're just minding your own business, and the next they'll pull a full Santorum on you.  Before you know it you'll be up to your chest in the local man-on-dog scene.

Seriously, though, that's the pinnacle of this nefarious Agenda? We want to get married? I simply fail to understand just what the fuck it is these people have a problem with. Those two gay people who live together down the street from you now get married, and your life is affected... how? The only thing that gives your marriage value is the fact that queers can't do it? If that's the case, then your marriage--and likely your life--is a hollow fucking lie.

Goddammit, it just pisses me off to see everybody gang up on the little guy. Are they worried the gays are going to start flipping us? Do these straight people seriously think that they could be convinced--even coerced--to enjoy man-on-man cornholing? Straight men of high street, could anybody ever, under any circumstances talk you into not enjoying tits? Ever?

So, that's how tenuous Arkansas' grip on heterosexuality is: they are straight until somebody suggests otherwise. Godfuckingdammit.

ah297900 wrote:

Goddammit, it just pisses me off to see everybody gang up on the little guy.

If there's one thing Americans hate, it's an underdog.

ah297900 wrote:

Seriously, though, that's the pinnacle of this nefarious Agenda? We want to get married? I simply fail to understand just what the fuck it is these people have a problem with. Those two gay people who live together down the street from you now get married, and your life is affected... how? The only thing that gives your marriage value is the fact that queers can't do it? If that's the case, then your marriage--and likely your life--is a hollow fucking lie.

Goddammit, it just pisses me off to see everybody gang up on the little guy. Are they worried the gays are going to start flipping us? Do these straight people seriously think that they could be convinced--even coerced--to enjoy man-on-man cornholing? Straight men of high street, could anybody ever, under any circumstances talk you into not enjoying tits? Ever?

So, that's how tenuous Arkansas' grip on heterosexuality is: they are straight until somebody suggests otherwise. Godfuckingdammit.

A while ago it was on the ballot here and I voted for it.  It showed up on the ballot in Colorado and my little sister voted against.  I asked her why.  The only reason she could/would give me is she was afraid it would raise her health insurance rates if partners of gay cow-orkers were covered.  That's not even close to the silliest reason I've heard.  For the most part they seem silly though.

headkicker_girl wrote:

unless it means money out of his pocket, then he's against it.

What these morons don't realize is that keeping kids in the foster care system as wards of the state -- not to mention the fact that many of them wind up in the juvenile justice system as a result of their fucked-up life experiences -- costs taxpayer dollars as well. In fact, it's probably more expensive than putting them in the care of teh gheys with their cohabitation insurance.

Yes, I know I'm connecting some loose threads, but I don't care.

ah297900 wrote:

tojo2000 wrote:

Watch out achoo!  One second you're just minding your own business, and the next they'll pull a full Santorum on you.  Before you know it you'll be up to your chest in the local man-on-dog scene.

Seriously, though, that's the pinnacle of this nefarious Agenda? We want to get married? I simply fail to understand just what the fuck it is these people have a problem with. Those two gay people who live together down the street from you now get married, and your life is affected... how? The only thing that gives your marriage value is the fact that queers can't do it? If that's the case, then your marriage--and likely your life--is a hollow fucking lie.

Goddammit, it just pisses me off to see everybody gang up on the little guy. Are they worried the gays are going to start flipping us? Do these straight people seriously think that they could be convinced--even coerced--to enjoy man-on-man cornholing? Straight men of high street, could anybody ever, under any circumstances talk you into not enjoying tits? Ever?

So, that's how tenuous Arkansas' grip on heterosexuality is: they are straight until somebody suggests otherwise. Godfuckingdammit.

I couldn't agree with a rant more...

The most "backwards assed country fucks" I've ever met in my life were also the dudes I'd most picture beat off to late night wrestling programs. They make laws like this to PROVE they sure aren't one of those "dad-burned homosexuals" (god forbid you catch them drunk with their best buddy!!!).

If anything, this proves that closet corn-holing is alive and well in the deep south (big surprise there).

headkicker_girl wrote:

I've never heard of one kid who turned gay because his or her parents are gay.

Likewise, every gay person I know comes from straight parents. This has nothing to do with evidence, logic, or the best interests of anyone involved. It's the most baldfaced "fuck you" to the gays I've seen in a while.

sigmoid freud wrote:

pALEPHx wrote:

Think of the gay puppies!

Now I am wondering. Who the fuck invented the "poodle" trim, anyway? The original Poodles were hunting dogs - water retrievers.

That, itself, is actually the origin of the poodle cut. The fur - hair? - was left in place around the joints to protect them from the weather and cold, while the rest was trimmed for efficiency. Look at a poodle with that cut next time you see one and you'll understand the logic behind it.

Sigh. Then I read a story like this today and wonder where/when/if/how it's all going to end.

ah297900 wrote:

Seriously, though, that's the pinnacle of this nefarious Agenda? We want to get married? I simply fail to understand just what the fuck it is these people have a problem with. Those two gay people who live together down the street from you now get married, and your life is affected... how? The only thing that gives your marriage value is the fact that queers can't do it? If that's the case, then your marriage--and likely your life--is a hollow fucking lie.

Ahchoo you are missing the point, god forbid the gays succeed and we all just laugh it off.

Alan Sears (Spongebob is gay!!!!)-Alliance Defense Fund President, CEO and General Counsel:

"Homosexual activists have noticed very astutely that the use of humor is a primary vehicle to help them reach their goal of cultural acceptance. Humor had been used by the entertainment industry in the past to stir up antiwar sentiment (the Marx brothers' Duck Soup, M*A*S*H, Dr. Strangelove) and to promote feminism (Nine to Five) and cross-dressing (Some Like It Hot and Tootsie). Homosexual producers and directors readily admit that humor is their best weapon to soften up the American public for the future promotion of their agenda. If you can get people to laugh about something, you are then on the way to convincing them to accept the behavior as normal." (The Homosexual Agenda: Exposing the Principal Threat to Religious Freedom Today, coauthored with Craig Osten, 2003)

headkicker_girl  wrote:

I have a friend who is indifferent to the issue of gay marriage...unless it means money out of his pocket, then he's against it.

Actually, keeping the gays down takes quite a bit of money out of people's pockets. What with the War on Xmass winding down. It just wasn't as profitable as was projected for an enduring conflict.

The ADF has become one of the leading proponents of the "war on Christmas." While it raises a lot of money fighting this "war," actual litigation over the issue is rare. Other ADF cases seem to have been filed as ploys to raise cash. In 2005, the ADF sued a California public school after claiming that officials had ordered a teacher to stop using the Declaration of Independence in class. The claims were exposed as false, and the case quickly unraveled and was dropped - but not until the ADF had used the manufactured controversy to win media appearances and raise money.

Last edited by Johnny_Rotten (2008-11-11 13:51:24)