Poll
| A) Jerry Brown | 50% - 7 | |||||
| B) Meg Whitman | 7% - 1 | |||||
| C) 3rd party | 14% - 2 | |||||
| D) Adolf Hitler (write in) | 7% - 1 | |||||
| E) B and D | 7% - 1 | |||||
| F) None of the Above | 14% - 2 | |||||
|
| ||||||
#1 2010-10-16 03:42:51
I hate them all. The results of this poll dictate how I vote next month. I’ll even use my big mouth to campaign for your choice, which may not have the intended effect.
Offline
#2 2010-10-16 03:45:22
Vote for the one that knows what he/she talks about and hasn't sent jobs overseas.
Offline
#3 2010-10-16 03:53:32
So that's one for Hitler then?
Offline
#4 2010-10-16 07:10:34
I would consider a third party if I still lived in California, but Meg is pretty scary if she's willing to set a spending record to buy the job. It makes one wonder what she really wants. I also hate her because she fucked up the bidding and feedback processes on eBay. Even the Orange County Register is only reluctantly endorsing her, which is surprising because they are usually enthusiastic about any fascist who seeks public office.
The idea of closet case Governor Moonbeam getting his old job back doesn’t do anything for me either. Yes, he and that dyke Linda Ronstadt only pretended to be a couple for the sake of their careers. Don’t act so surprised.
Offline
#5 2010-10-16 07:45:36
Jerry seems to be the lesser of two bad choices, better go Brown
Offline
#6 2010-10-16 13:21:28
Voting for a third party is like flushing your vote down the toilet. Meg Whitman is probably twice as old as me and has been less politically active than I have. Then she steps in with a shit ton of money and zero experience, and doesn't like gays. Meg Whitman should cut her teeth on something less important than an entire state.
Offline
#7 2010-10-16 13:25:16
fnord wrote:
I would consider a third party if I still lived in California, but Meg is pretty scary if she's willing to set a spending record to buy the job. It makes one wonder what she really wants. I also hate her because she fucked up the bidding and feedback processes on eBay. Even the Orange County Register is only reluctantly endorsing her, which is surprising because they are usually enthusiastic about any fascist who seeks public office.
The idea of closet case Governor Moonbeam getting his old job back doesn’t do anything for me either. Yes, he and that dyke Linda Ronstadt only pretended to be a couple for the sake of their careers. Don’t act so surprised.
Okay.... I knew Brown, and members of Linda's family and group. They were pretty nice people, I had dinner with Brown a couple of times, and no, he was not ghey. Fantasies aside I wish he wasn't running, but he is a better choice than Meg who has a scary family.
Brown's time in office as Governor was as golden as the times of his father was. That Fuck Face Reagan spoiled the porridge and fucked California royally, only to go forward and do it to the US...with the help of a nation of sheep.
Offline
#8 2010-10-16 14:36:22
taffy wrote:
Voting for a third party is like flushing your vote down the toilet.
This is why I always vote Whig.
Offline
#9 2010-10-16 15:24:27
I'm voting for Brown. Simple.
Offline
#10 2010-10-16 15:25:31
taffy wrote:
Voting for a third party is like flushing your vote down the toilet.
You're just buying into the 2-party line; every vote counts. If you recall Ross Perot's run he became so likely to win the presidency as a 3rd party candidate that he dropped out of the race for a period.
A vote for the 3rd place guy is a vote to end the strangle-hold the Repubocats have on the country.
Offline
#11 2010-10-16 20:33:44
Emmeran wrote:
A vote for the 3rd place guy is a vote to end the strangle-hold the Repubocats have on the country.
I agree with your reasoning, but fuck the factious 3rd parties. Peace and Freedom should join up with the Greens and attract a bunch of Libertarians in a mega party love fest. Instead each fiefdom is lorded over by those more concerned with careers than leadership.
Offline
#12 2010-10-16 21:06:41
phoQ wrote:
Emmeran wrote:
A vote for the 3rd place guy is a vote to end the strangle-hold the Repubocats have on the country.
I agree with your reasoning, but fuck the factious 3rd parties. Peace and Freedom should join up with the Greens and attract a bunch of Libertarians in a mega party love fest. Instead each fiefdom is lorded over by those more concerned with careers than leadership.
Ain't that the truth, and what about those splitters the Trotskyites? Fuckers.
Offline
#13 2010-10-16 21:50:40
Trotsky would have been easy to deal with, and would never have signed a pact with Hitler. The Stalinists are the ones you have to watch out for.
Offline
#14 2010-10-16 22:56:57
Tall Paul wrote:
Trotsky would have been easy to deal with, and would never have signed a pact with Hitler.
And so we come full circle.
Offline
#15 2010-10-16 23:02:19
Jesuits - like former marines, former smokers, and former moonies, there's no such thing as an ex jesuit - are predictable.
Brown'll fuck it up like last time and his only redeeming quality, he'll fuck it up less than his competition.
We may all have our price but we ask for too little. Earl Butz (1909–2008) was right.
'A warm place to shit, a tight pussy and an easy pair of shoes.'
Offline
#16 2010-10-16 23:20:57
choad wrote:
Brown'll fuck it up like last time and his only redeeming quality, he'll fuck it up less than his competition.
Exactly! That's the best we have to hope for these days.
Offline
#17 2010-10-17 10:33:01
Does it really matter? Once Prop 19 passes CA will just get into a nuclear pissing contest with Washington and all of it's remaining mental energies will go into fighting the feds (Californians will "discover" states rights) and trying to figure out where to borrow more money.
So, does it matter?
Offline
#18 2010-10-17 13:48:00
My ex-boss, a guy who carries a copy of "Atlas Shrugged" in his briefcase, isn't going for Whitman. But Brown?
We're fucked.
Offline
