I hate, hate, hate people ganging up on someone, particularly when that someone has actually devoted a lot of free time to making sure we even have this forum. WTF, who the fuck cares what banners are up and what ones are not. Just because my shitty ones-or your shitty ones aren't picked, Jesus, does it really matter that much to you? Half the posts on here-mine included-are asshats by accident, so I'm not too worried about some precious content being deleted.

Jesus, Zoo, who peed in your cornflakes today to make you come up with such a nasty thread?

Last edited by icangetyouatoe (2008-09-16 16:49:14)

icangetyouatoe wrote:

This is total bullshit, is completely unnecessary and I wonder wtf good you thought would come out of posting such a nasty poll.

Fuck you, Zoo.

But you have to admit that Princess Biscuit sucks ass and Pale only did what many of us would like to do, if only to fuck with "it."

But let's change the subject and speculate (again) on who the sockpuppet might be.  My vote of for Jadetree, a/k/a, Rip_Van_Uterus.  Apparently he's gone legitimate in the frozen north and has his reputation to consider.  I'm thinking this is his way to continue to torture us anonymously.

PS -- it's working.

Wait. I figured it out. Zoo. Don't you work in the financial industry, like as an analyst or something? If so, I think we can all understand why you might be having a bad day....

Last edited by icangetyouatoe (2008-09-16 17:19:42)

They are just picking on you, Zookeeper, because you're black. Don't let the bastards get you down.

Hey man, you hiring?

icangetyouatoe wrote:

Jesus, does it really matter that much to you?

No.

Jesus, Zoo, who peed in your cornflakes today to make you come up with such a nasty thread?

Not my thread.

George Orr wrote:

ptah, I'm ready to take away your chocolate right now.  "Mommy-state" my ass--are you capable of communicating without using second- and third-hand buzzwords?

Please see my edited post above yours.

Amen.  The only people banning stuff (or wanting to) now are the fucking conservatives.  Liberals haven't taken away your right to decide whether or not to have an abortion.  Liberals haven't taken your right to have or not have a marriage, either gay or straight.  Liberals haven't tried to pull materials from school and public libraries and burn them.  Sarah Palin, the current poster-critter for "conservadeeves" would like to do all that, and more.  Pee-tah, go back to minding Fudge, and leave political discussion to the grownups who recognize that Fox News and the Washington Times are not news sources.

ptah13 wrote:

I'm not worried about any race war, I'm worried those fuckers will outlaw my guns!!! lol

Hey, I'm having fun, "for the children".

When Oprama outlaws my guns I'll only be an outlaw.  lol for the lulz, HI Roger.  This thread is a lot more fun with politics involved that it was when it was just bashing Pale.

tojo2000 wrote:

It's been so tempting to delete this message and watch the shit hit the fan, but I...must...resist.

Do it do it quick before other people see this post!

Dirckman wrote:

The United States two party system is fucked up at best....  It leaves us arguing back and forth about whether to choose Democrat or Republican when both parties are worthless.....  It's time we dumped our celebrity politicians and our political celebrities and put an intellectual in the White House....  By intellectual I don't mean Liberal elitist intellectual either, there is no intelligence there, just pretentiousness....  I won't even start with the Republicans, until they distance themselves from the evangelicals I have nothing good to say about them.....

I just wish we could vote "no confidence" and make both parties go back and pick new candidates.

whiskytangofoxtrot wrote:

The only people banning stuff (or wanting to) now are the fucking conservatives.

Indeed!  It's the conservatives in universities that ban "hate speech".  It's conservatives who want to bring back the "Fairness Doctrine".  It's the conservatives on college campuses who shout down conservative speakers and won't let them speak.  Wait...

My vote is not to ban Pale.  I was censored at Cruel and I’ve been banned at Drudge Retort.  Thanks to me, rcade had his cabana boys take freedom of speech on his sites out behind the barn and stomp it to death.  For his unnecessary act of censorship, I'd like to recommend Pale receive a Tabasco Sauce enema, but I’m afraid he would derive a great deal of sexual pleasure from this which would defeat the purpose.

Last edited by fnord (2008-09-17 00:28:44)

And Zoo, give me a break, if you're going to gang up on someone, setting up a poll whereby everyone can gratuitously criticize someone, at least take ownership of said gratuitously nasty act  and not be such a pussy about it ("I'm just one person" is such a  bitchy junior high cheerleader thing to say, sitting in the principals office before suspension for torturing intellectuals in the cafeteria, and we all know that's the same bitchy girl who gets knocked up sophmore year in high school by some employee of Fries and ends up working at Food Parade, fat and bottle blonde for the rest of her life.)

I shall return now to posting cute baby animal pictures on the picture thread. Thank you very much.

Last edited by icangetyouatoe (2008-09-17 00:04:24)

fnord wrote:

My vote is not to ban Pale.

Huh?  Who said anything about banning him?

<a href="http://tinypic.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i33.tinypic.com/2nvusza.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic"></img></a>

Last edited by tojo2000 (2008-09-17 01:42:52)

Bigcat wrote:

headkicker_girl wrote:

icangetyouatoe wrote:

This is total bullshit, is completely unnecessary and I wonder wtf good you thought would come out of posting such a nasty poll.

Fuck you, Zoo.

But you have to admit that Princess Biscuit sucks ass and Pale only did what many of us would like to do, if only to fuck with "it."

But let's change the subject and speculate (again) on who the sockpuppet might be.  My vote of for Jadetree, a/k/a, Rip_Van_Uterus.  Apparently he's gone legitimate in the frozen north and has his reputation to consider.  I'm thinking this is his way to continue to torture us anonymously.

PS -- it's working.

I also was thinking it might be Jadetree.

I must have missed something.  Jade was a legitimate contributor.  What would be the impetus for him going rogue and becoming a troll without maintaining his former personality?

McCain's gonna neutron bomb the poor to revitalize the economy.  Bye bye, citizens of Detroit!

PERSONAL MSSG:

Roger_That wrote:

pALEPHx wrote:

BLAH BLAH BLAH Windbag BLAH BLAH BLAH Windbag

Hey Rog - thanks for the pics. I think you're right, the left one hangs a little lower than the right.
As for this stupid thread, I voted to ban pENIx, but only because he's a cocksucking faggot - in theory, I'm in favour of censorship, as long as it punishes and suppresses my enemies.
On another note, Zoochini certainly is becoming an uppity cuss, ain't he? What do you think happened - he lay dormant for years, now he's up and angry. Do you think it's the male nigger menopause (MNM)?
On yet another note, I just spent five days in Thailand banging underage shemales. It was fabulous - practically the only difference between a Thai boycunt and a real vagina is the smell. Much to my delight, I think I caught the syph, and I want to share the genius. Seeing as it's not sailing season (or is it? What do I know, I'm a Zodiacker), how about we make a baby for you to look after - guaranteed high IQ and EQ. Anyways, my syph probably cancels out your little peccadildo, so why not come for a visit? The only thing wetter than Vancouver in the winter are the girls who yowl outside my window at night - you'll enjoy waving to them as you churn yourself to butter on my crow-nested spar.
Take care - hope to see you, WCL

I vote we continue to torment Pale.

That and more tentacle on the sidebar.

opsec wrote:

I vote we continue to torment Pale.

In Vancouver - but it probably started in Fagtown USA - the local sodomites paint pink triangles on the cement every time and every where a fag bashing takes place. (I know all the spots - the VHS {Vancouver Homophobe Society} visits them for picnics and badminton tournaments.) Could we institute something like that on H-S?


Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

Last edited by WilberCuntLicker (2008-09-17 19:13:47)

pALEPHx wrote:

I stand by my decisions. Why not? Nobody else does. If people would prefer to have an anonymous shitball posting My Little Pony crap over and over without interacting, then so be it. But don't make it appear as if I'm deleting posts. You know perfectly well what the implication is there, and it's not the same as raking the drivel out of sight before it becomes just another troll-feeder.

Have you ever thought about putting a new thread up called "Trolls" and just MOVING blatantly annoying threads there?  That way, it's not censorship, but totally annoying trolls like Miz Bizcuit will only be viewed by people who WANT to feed the troll.

feisty wrote:

pALEPHx wrote:

I stand by my decisions. Why not? Nobody else does. If people would prefer to have an anonymous shitball posting My Little Pony crap over and over without interacting, then so be it. But don't make it appear as if I'm deleting posts. You know perfectly well what the implication is there, and it's not the same as raking the drivel out of sight before it becomes just another troll-feeder.

Have you ever thought about putting a new thread up called "Trolls" and just MOVING blatantly annoying threads there?  That way, it's not censorship

Sorry feisty but yes that would be censorship.  If somebody ushered you into an empty room every time you tried to say something to a group of people you would say you were being censored.

For shit sake people, she isn't any real nuisance.  Yeah, she caused a shit storm one night but she hasn't had a repeat performance.  Nobody had a fit when Kathetersong (or whatever his name was) did his drive-by posting on Cruel.com without ever actually interacting with anyone.

- Everybody knows who she is and can opt to not open her threads if they don't want to. 
- She posts maybe twice a week. 
- There's an ignore feature here.

I didn't mean to move her every time she posts... only when she's trolling.  What if we added it to our ridiculous number of sticky threads?  Then it might be advantageous to be a troll... your posts would always be easy to find.

I personally don't care.  I like feeding the trolls.  I just figured it might be a decent compromise.

jesusluvspegging wrote:

feisty wrote:

Have you ever thought about putting a new thread up called "Trolls" and just MOVING blatantly annoying threads there?

Or we could just change the button up at the top that says "High-Street Forum" to say "Trolls," I believe it would work out about the same.

Good point.

Zookeeper wrote:

For shit sake people, she isn't any real nuisance.  Yeah, she caused a shit storm one night but she hasn't had a repeat performance.  Nobody had a fit when Kathetersong (or whatever his name was) did his drive-by posting on Cruel.com without ever actually interacting with anyone.

Hey . . .   Kathy submitted more original contributions to Cruel than all of us combined and don't you fore-get it!  Hell, the "CIA stole my penis" bit was one of the greatest running-gags in all of internets history as far as I'm concerned.