This isn't a new argument.  According to a number of extremist Christian morons, gay sex is more pleasurable than straight sex.

...and, the way these poor closet cases treat their women, they're probably right.

orangeplus wrote:

Of course within 2 years of a world wherein over half the men are gay, a super AIDS will evolve which will turn the skin of those afflicted to a generous mauve before driving them mad, then into the ground. This virus, due to the ubiquitous computing prevalent in this doomed future, will become the first to jump the meme/blood barrier, becoming pixel-transmittable.

This was revealed to John Smith in the hidden third book of Mormon. This is why they take such a hardline against pornography and self-manipulation. (It will be found that iAIDS can only infect if the victim is manipulating an erect penis. This will spell the doom of those technical people who would otherwise have been able to create updates to the antivirus software that would have stopped the outbreak. They were first to die.) The church law allowing for polygamy were a training program for that time when his paternity would have to deal with 10 times the amount of nagging bullshit then that which many men find unable to survive against today.

Sounds plausible to me.

We noticed.

Like poor Suzy will be sitting at home, starting balefully at the phone and waiting for it to ring while little Johnny is down at the cowboy bar doing the conga line all night long.

Even if you follow the articles premise, what's not to like about a declining birth rate (other than a well padded retirement) and children born of choice instead of hormone fueled mistakes.

Emmeran wrote:

Nah, just keep in mind that 90% of young men will fuck anything that moves (even slightly).  The other 10% are broken down evenly between the fags and super-breeders.

Nice bell curve.  That’s kind of what happens when there are no taboos.

orangeplus wrote:

You all forget the inevitable "Lesbian Bed Death".

That's because nobody gives a rat's ass about real lesbians, only the hot ones in porn flicks!

Emmeran wrote:

Nah, just keep in mind that 90% of young men will fuck anything that moves (even slightly).  The other 10% are broken down evenly between the fags and super-breeders.

Eh. I don't think so.  It all comes down to scent.  The scent of a man does absolutely nothing for most men.  But the scent of a woman - particularly an aroused one - is extremely attractive.

fnord wrote:

According to this Beliefnet article, most men will prefer sex with other men once the social stigma is removed.

And yet, oddly, heterosexual men continue having sex with heterosexual women and the world has continued and now has 6.5 billion people. Obviously, you breeder boys aren't gettin' with the program.

orangeplus wrote:

I think that smell thing is utter bullshit. If it were true I wouldn't be able to get out of my apartment because of all the writhing naked female bodies stacked up on it.

Cause I smell good.

Don't you live right where it would be naked men instead? Or at least a combination of men and women?

Here in Vegass, drunk and uninhibited people grope everyone in public.

It can be yucky.

[this post intentionally left blank]

sofaking wrote:

orangeplus wrote:

I think that smell thing is utter bullshit. If it were true I wouldn't be able to get out of my apartment because of all the writhing naked female bodies stacked up on it.

Cause I smell good.

Don't you live right where it would be naked men instead? Or at least a combination of men and women?

Here in Vegass, drunk and uninhibited people grope everyone in public.

It can be yucky.

Yes, yes it is yucky. Only because drunk and sweaty groping people smell rather sour. All the air conditioning the Hoover dam can keep running for time  eternal cannot dispel that scent.