#2 2009-09-30 04:22:28

How are you spinning this info on the ring wing you crackhead?  The OKC bombing was during Clinton's watch.

Offline

 

#3 2009-09-30 08:53:58

No, it had the smell of Janet Reno all over it. I doubt that anyone ever bothered Clinton about something as important as that.

Don't you think that it's kind of suspicious that the FBI would still be withholding security camera footage of public roads and sidewalks 14 years after the fact, even though the main "suspect" has already been executed? What is on such a tape that "could cause grave damage to our national security"?

I figure the best case scenario is the feds doing something really dumb like checking out the U-Haul and then walking away, not realizing that it was about to go boom. But it's probably something else. But the OKC bombing has always seemed strange. Some loner and his goofy friend decide to go do this bombing, get picked up and jailed. But nobody else, no other militia folks, no other conspirators, no friends and associates.

Don't forget, Nixon went down for what wasn't on the tapes he provided.

Offline

 

#4 2009-09-30 10:03:07

I looked into it more, and the name mentioned in the article leads to an intriguing trial of bodies: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world … 74920.html

Offline

 

#5 2009-09-30 12:12:03

Dusty - I'm not sure how Forti got your intent so mixed up.  Must be something he smoked. 

Good post for the "no consipiracy is too far-fetched" crowd.  It's an enigma wrapped in a conundrum wrapped in delicious sponge cake!

Offline

 

#6 2009-09-30 12:22:11

I got the reaction I was looking for. 

Thnx!

Bai!

Offline

 

#7 2009-09-30 13:27:32

Dmtdust wrote:

I got the reaction I was looking for. 

Thnx!

Bai!

Fine, I'll feed the troll more, but I'm going to bed after this...Jose Padilla is John Doe 2.

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com