Whatever Breitbart did was nothing compared to Obama's firing of her.  Currently there is a definite conspiracy of leftists to play the race card.  A perfect (and desperate) example of asserting what they wish to be true and never letting facts get in the way of a ridiculous argument.  Breitbart has offered $100,000 to anyone who delivers audio or video confirmation that the Black Caucus was called niggers at the protest they chose to walk through.  There were dozens of media there as well as all those private cell phones and video cameras, and nobody heard or recorded a single "nigger" being shouted.  Although, the members of the caucus claimed it was shouted 15 times.  Nasty fucking lies!

fortinbras wrote:

Actually I was puzzled on how foxnews was racist for running the story when they didn't run the story until after the NAACP and Obama condemned the video.

Why would that have any impact on whether or not their coverage was racist?

Fled wrote:

As for the "definite conspiracy of leftists to play the race card," you really do need to increase your meds.

Yes, and not just the whacked out leftists.  How about a conspiracy of journalists to use the race card to help get Obama elected?  But then, I suppose for you the ends justify just about any means.

“If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us,” Ackerman wrote on the Journolist listserv in April 2008. “Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”

phreddy wrote:

Fled wrote:

As for the "definite conspiracy of leftists to play the race card," you really do need to increase your meds.

Yes, and not just the whacked out leftists.  How about a conspiracy of journalists to use the race card to help get Obama elected?  But then, I suppose for you the ends justify just about any means.

“If the right forces us all to either defend Wright or tear him down, no matter what we choose, we lose the game they’ve put upon us,” Ackerman wrote on the Journolist listserv in April 2008. “Instead, take one of them — Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”

Really, phreddy?  In a discussion of how taking one segment of a conversation turned out to smear someone for meaning something totally different, you're going to point us to one sentence taken out of an email as proof of anything?

MSG Tripps wrote:

Victoria Jackson is naked and thinking.

I'm amazed she can do both at once.

So editing a video of someone to say something else is henious, and then not to admit that you were in error, and had done an injustice speaks volumes about Andrew B.  Your supporting his actions Phreddy makes me question your moral compass as well.  Whereas, the administration was reacting to a perceived situation (and doing it badly) Andrew B. was deliberately creating a fabrication to satisfy his point.

If you agree with his actions, and can't see the malignancy in it, I suggest you dose yourself with about 500 mics and go over your life path for the last 40 or so years and try to heal what you apparently have become.

If you are just trying to make rhetorical points, then ignore the second paragraph, except for the dosing, and have a good time!

Your Pal,
Dusty