It's a bit arty.  And I decolorized it.

Done.

Ok Dusty, I can't really fake it anymore, as that photo is far too artsy even for me.

The gig is up, we were just messing with you people.  As if Dusty would do that...and as if I'd let photos like that in the wrong hands.  Or any hands.

You people disappoint me.

Damn. . . and I was about to compliment Smitty on her sleek pudenda.

I'd continue to be paranoid RT, these are pretty cheap.  You can't be sure that there's not some hidden cam porn of you somewhere. 

Tell you what, I'll check out all the porn on the internet just to make sure.

George Orr wrote:

opsec wrote:

I'll check out all the porn on the internet just to make sure.

Now that's a gentleman, right there.  My hat's off to you, sir.  Better stock up on eyedrops.

And kleenex/jergens.

Stinkhammer wrote:

Well, RT, after all that non-sense, just because you are right does not mean you will win a defamation lawsuit.  You can be wrongfully sued for defamation and soon find it is not worth the hassles of depositions, legal fees, etc. to pursue it to the end especially of you are broke as you imply.  So, in the end you just take down the sites and apologize publicly.

Ah, justice.

Well I doubt if he sued me, he'd win.  I'm not poor, I have the money to fight him for awhile if it comes to that.  But most of my lawyer friends have said chances of him suing me are slim because then all of his business becomes public record.  That is probably the last thing he wants.

Good luck to them getting an apology out of me for putting up the truth.  They can jail me first.

Stinkhammer wrote:

What I'm saying is he does not have to win to beat you.  He can money whip you.  It happens all the time, Bright-eyes.

No shit, but I said I have the money to fight him.  It's worth it.

Spam post removed, please ban this user!

Last edited by fnord (2010-12-22 02:50:41)