#1 2013-02-14 06:34:25
NY Times reporter is outed
Elon Musk isn't amused
Last edited by Emmeran (2013-02-14 06:44:56)
Offline
#2 2013-02-14 08:44:22
Well, he DOES work for the New York Times...
Offline
#3 2013-02-14 23:54:36
The rebuttal.
The only thing I can be sure of is that each of them spends much of their effort carefully presenting what is most useful to them, disingenuously omitting what is inconvenient and ignoring the real story. Too bad because how the battery system performs and how an operator has to adjust to use it is fascinating in its own right. There are technical and cultural adjustments to be made in using this technology. Therein lies the story most want to hear actual info about.
I find the state of auto reviewing to be horrendous at this point. Most pro reviewers have no independence and produce the most unuseful biased and bland reporting. The rest has some slant of their own.
To reiterate: Tesla personnel told me over the phone that they were able to monitor the state of the battery. It was they who cleared me to leave Norwich after an hour of charging.
Offline
#4 2013-02-15 01:35:14
Well then maybe it's time to ditch the iPhone and get a device with accurate maps?
Offline
#6 2013-02-15 12:04:37
Although I am not a big fan of electric vehicles, I'm coming down on the side of Tesla in this instance. The reporter was obviously setting up a cheap shot from the beginning. Not to mention that Tesla is not stupid enough to send out a reviewer on a trip that the car could not make.
Offline
#7 2013-02-15 12:28:02
I tend to agree with you, the problem with electricity is that it is very difficult to store and has a bad habit of bleeding off quickly. The energy itself has to be harvested somewhere; most generation is still by oil or coal and in the end the entire process is highly inefficient and pollutant.
My neighbor did the solar panel/Nissan Leaf thing but she only has a 5 mile commute and living in SoCal makes solar a viable option. I am against drilling as I believe we should preserve our strategic resources obviously Main Battle Tanks and Strike Fighters won't be running off of batteries any time soon. The question is how do we manage our energy needs? I think everyone outside of the C-Suite realizes that Fracking if a really bad thing so we've ourselves a conundrum.
I like the concept of the Chevy Volt, I tend to feel that an onboard generator is a better choice than the Prius which has to switch to gas once you get above 43mph.
Last edited by Emmeran (2013-02-15 12:29:34)
Offline
#8 2013-02-16 00:18:33
I am a chef not an electrical engineer, but couldn't a large wire coil around the axle and magnets work at generating enough energy to keep your battery fully charged? You would still need the batteries to get going and for stopping at lights, heavy traffic and the like, but once up to 30 mph or so, it seems to me you would have enough spin for all the electricity you could need. Or is this something that has already been tried and failed? I wish I was more up to snuff on this.
Offline