#2701 2008-01-11 00:43:09
Offline
#2702 2008-01-11 00:44:13
Offline
#2703 2008-01-11 00:45:28
Offline
#2704 2008-01-11 00:46:38
Offline
#2705 2008-01-11 00:48:11
Offline
#2706 2008-01-11 00:49:17
Offline
#2707 2008-01-11 00:50:22
Offline
#2708 2008-01-11 00:51:26
Offline
#2709 2008-01-11 00:52:33
Last edited by icangetyouatoe (2008-01-11 00:53:07)
Offline
#2710 2008-01-11 00:53:53
Offline
#2711 2008-01-11 00:54:58
Offline
#2712 2008-01-11 00:59:27
Offline
#2713 2008-01-11 01:00:31
Offline
#2714 2008-01-11 01:01:33
Offline
#2715 2008-01-11 01:04:19
Offline
#2716 2008-01-11 01:11:00
Offline
#2717 2008-01-11 01:19:19
Offline
#2718 2008-01-11 01:21:42
Offline
#2719 2008-01-11 01:23:27
This ancient Daguerreotype surfaced over Christmas from the bottom of a box I was about to discard. Pictured here is my great, great, great, great grandmother. I don't know whether to believe the brittle paper it was wrapped in but the image was supposedly taken in Paris and later mounted in Boston.
If the 1840 date is accurate, it was taken less than year after photography was invented. I know its subject - Elizabeth M Collins - was born in 1783, before the Articles of Confederation were ratified and before the US existed. Neat, huh? Dunno what I'll do with this.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2720 2008-01-11 01:24:39
Offline
#2721 2008-01-11 01:32:01
choad wrote:
If the 1840 date is accurate, it was taken less than year after photography was invented. I know its subject - Elizabeth M Collins - was born in 1783, before the Articles of Confederation were ratified and before the US existed. Neat, huh? Dunno what I'll do with this.
I think photography was pioneered in France, so given your dates, it's probably the only place it was available at the time.
Offline
#2722 2008-01-11 01:33:27
Offline
#2723 2008-01-11 01:35:30
Offline
#2724 2008-01-11 01:36:40
Offline
#2725 2008-01-11 01:46:32
Offline
#2726 2008-01-11 11:30:38
choad wrote:
This ancient Daguerreotype surfaced over Christmas from the bottom of a box I was about to discard. Pictured here is my great, great, great, great grandmother. I don't know whether to believe the brittle paper it was wrapped in but the image was supposedly taken in Paris and later mounted in Boston.
If the 1840 date is accurate, it was taken less than year after photography was invented. I know its subject - Elizabeth M Collins - was born in 1783, before the Articles of Confederation were ratified and before the US existed. Neat, huh? Dunno what I'll do with this.
Clearly this is an old picture, but I'm doubting the 1840 date based upon the style of dress. Now, granted, that's not a locked-in sort of thing and personal style could have a lot to do with that, but this style of dress seems more appropriate for a later era, perhaps during the 1860's-1870's. In the early 1800's (the Regency period) a women's collar area was typically more open - it was popular for women to expose their lower neck and portions of their clavicle, with their shoulders sometimes exposed as well when in more formal attire. Travelling clothes were the primary high-collar rainments of the era, and the woman in this picture does not appear to be dressed for travel. High collars and bow-necks weren't really fashionable until well into the Victorian era. Further, although this is a B&W picture and therefore it's difficult to tell actual color, it would appear that the demi-gloves and dress trim are black or a very dark color, and women did not commonly wear dark colours or black until the mid-1800's (after the Great Exhibition of 1851).
To properly date this it would be important to understand the actual type of photograph. Is this really a Daguerreotype? If so, it' should be behind a glass frame, as they are *very* fragile and should never be touched. The material that is is printed on (glass, tin, etc) is also important as this will be key to dating the photo.
The Philadelphia Print Shop are experts in dating older prints (their folks are often on PBS' Antiques Roadshow)... might want to give them a ring and perhaps they can help (they're on G'town Ave in Chestunt Hill).
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-01-11 11:47:42)
Offline
#2727 2008-01-11 11:57:45
whosasailorthen wrote:
To properly date this it would be important to understand the actual type of photograph. Is this really a Daguerreotype? If so, it' should be behind a glass frame, as they are *very* fragile and should never be touched. The material that is is printed on (glass, tin, etc) is also important as this will be key to dating the photo.
Many, many thanks. You're right and it is. The only things I'm sure about here are the subject (she died in 1851), and the type of photo. Everything else is suspect. I'll contact those folks in Philadelphia and let you know.
Offline
#2728 2008-01-11 18:29:17
Offline
#2729 2008-01-11 18:30:59
Just getting back ON TOPIC HERE...ahem..
Offline
#2730 2008-01-11 18:32:06
I have to post all this shit somewhere because it's taking up space on my desktop.
Offline
#2731 2008-01-11 18:33:12
Offline
#2732 2008-01-11 18:34:17
Offline
#2733 2008-01-11 18:35:18
Offline
#2734 2008-01-11 18:36:38
Offline
#2735 2008-01-11 20:44:38
#2736 2008-01-12 02:08:54
Offline
#2737 2008-01-12 02:31:06
#2738 2008-01-12 02:33:49
Offline
#2739 2008-01-12 07:20:08
Offline
#2740 2008-01-12 07:44:23
Offline
#2741 2008-01-12 09:50:04
Offline
#2742 2008-01-12 22:34:49
Offline
#2743 2008-01-13 02:14:34
Offline
#2744 2008-01-13 02:28:18
Offline
#2745 2008-01-13 02:29:22
Offline
#2746 2008-01-13 02:30:33
Offline
#2747 2008-01-13 12:54:46
#2748 2008-01-13 13:44:39
Offline
#2749 2008-01-13 13:46:10
Offline
#2750 2008-01-13 13:48:17
Offline