#3551 2008-02-10 21:27:59
For Dickman....
Offline
#3552 2008-02-10 21:29:53
Offline
#3553 2008-02-10 21:47:12
Offline
#3554 2008-02-10 22:34:37
Offline
#3555 2008-02-10 22:35:25
Yeah hi Dirck!
Offline
#3556 2008-02-10 22:35:43
Offline
#3557 2008-02-10 22:36:37
Offline
#3558 2008-02-10 22:39:32
Hi Dusty!
Offline
#3559 2008-02-10 22:40:02
Offline
#3560 2008-02-10 22:51:36
Offline
#3561 2008-02-10 22:53:08
My workplace.jpg)
Offline
#3562 2008-02-10 23:13:56
Offline
#3563 2008-02-10 23:22:52
Offline
#3564 2008-02-10 23:58:11
Offline
#3565 2008-02-11 00:03:39
Ewww
Offline
#3566 2008-02-11 00:44:45
Offline
#3567 2008-02-11 00:52:33
whosasailorthen wrote:
http://www.wethole.co.uk/images/breasts/breasts-11.jpg
http://www.wethole.co.uk/images/breasts/breasts-10.jpg
http://www.wethole.co.uk/images/breasts/breasts-09.jpg
http://www.wethole.co.uk/images/breasts/breasts-12.jpg
http://www.wethole.co.uk/images/breasts/breasts-02.jpg
http://www.wethole.co.uk/images/breasts/breasts-08.jpg
http://www.wethole.co.uk/images/breasts/breasts-05.jpg
http://www.wethole.co.uk/images/breasts/breasts-03.jpg
Bravo, Sailor! Most excellent progression.
Offline
#3568 2008-02-11 01:42:28
Offline
#3569 2008-02-11 03:42:22
#3570 2008-02-11 03:48:12
Offline
#3571 2008-02-11 11:51:13
Offline
#3572 2008-02-11 11:53:16
Offline
#3573 2008-02-11 11:55:11
Offline
#3574 2008-02-11 12:05:05
Offline
#3575 2008-02-11 13:14:02
Offline
#3576 2008-02-11 13:37:20
Offline
#3577 2008-02-11 19:26:43
Offline
#3578 2008-02-11 19:36:57
Looks like grampa's been into the kids manic panic again....
a little bit of post fetal meth syndrome....
Nice shirt....
Offline
#3579 2008-02-11 19:48:21
Some freaky for Dirckie
Offline
#3580 2008-02-11 20:01:06
I'm thinking this two images might be "Safe for Work"
after all: If a breast is exposed that isn't there, is it really porn at all?
Last edited by Emmeran (2008-02-11 20:02:45)
Offline
#3581 2008-02-11 20:15:56
Dmtdust wrote:
I love that drawing and have it here in a 30s hard cover reprint.
Offline
#3582 2008-02-11 20:26:05
Yeah, Rackham be the man!
Offline
#3583 2008-02-11 20:39:48
Offline
#3584 2008-02-11 20:42:40
Offline
#3585 2008-02-11 20:49:42
Offline
#3586 2008-02-11 20:49:58
Offline
#3587 2008-02-11 20:51:27
Offline
#3588 2008-02-11 20:52:44
Offline
#3589 2008-02-11 21:12:24
This photo's a seriously bad idea and should be deleted. Now.
Last edited by Dmtdust (2008-02-11 21:27:05)
Offline
#3590 2008-02-11 21:26:27
Done....
Offline
#3591 2008-02-11 21:56:24
In case anyone has any questions about the deleted photo, it depicted a sleeping child in the same room as two adults having sex. As innocuous as that may sound to some, it could land Bill's ass - and potentially all our buttocks - in a vastly unpleasant sling someplace.
DO NOT POST PHOTOS OF CHILDREN IN ANY KIND OF SEXUAL SITUATION. PERIOD.
Offline
#3592 2008-02-11 22:21:19
Offline
#3593 2008-02-11 22:27:52
Taint wrote:
In case anyone has any questions about the deleted photo, it depicted a sleeping child in the same room as two adults having sex. As innocuous as that may sound to some, it could land Bill's ass - and potentially all our buttocks - in a vastly unpleasant sling someplace.
DO NOT POST PHOTOS OF CHILDREN IN ANY KIND OF SEXUAL SITUATION. PERIOD.
ok Mr. Nazi Fag. No more pictures of your boy friend....
Last edited by Lurker (2008-02-11 22:29:01)
Offline
#3594 2008-02-11 22:53:43
Taint wrote:
In case anyone has any questions about the deleted photo, it depicted a sleeping child in the same room as two adults having sex. As innocuous as that may sound to some, it could land Bill's ass - and potentially all our buttocks - in a vastly unpleasant sling someplace.
DO NOT POST PHOTOS OF CHILDREN IN ANY KIND OF SEXUAL SITUATION. PERIOD.
Jesus H. Chirst on a stick! you americans are so fucking uptight. S'pose that's what comes from living in a totalitarian society.
Offline
#3595 2008-02-11 22:54:13
Offline
#3596 2008-02-11 22:58:26
Offline
#3597 2008-02-11 22:59:16
Zombie, it's not about being uptight. I thought the photo was funny - it was certainly tacky. I also know that anything - let me repeat - anything even vaguely reminiscent of child porn can get people in serious trouble here. Just don't do it.
Offline
#3598 2008-02-11 23:01:54
Taint wrote:
In case anyone has any questions about the deleted photo, it depicted a sleeping child in the same room as two adults having sex. As innocuous as that may sound to some, it could land Bill's ass - and potentially all our buttocks - in a vastly unpleasant sling someplace.
DO NOT POST PHOTOS OF CHILDREN IN ANY KIND OF SEXUAL SITUATION. PERIOD.
Good decision, and even better policy!!
and having briefly viewed the image in question (and noticing it was an obivous photoshop job), I was completely disgusted and agree strongly that such images should never be posted.
Offline
#3599 2008-02-11 23:04:04
Offline
#3600 2008-02-11 23:07:42
Emmeran wrote:
Taint wrote:
In case anyone has any questions about the deleted photo, it depicted a sleeping child in the same room as two adults having sex. As innocuous as that may sound to some, it could land Bill's ass - and potentially all our buttocks - in a vastly unpleasant sling someplace.
DO NOT POST PHOTOS OF CHILDREN IN ANY KIND OF SEXUAL SITUATION. PERIOD.Good decision, and even better policy!!
and having briefly viewed the image in question (and noticing it was an obivous photoshop job), I was completely disgusted and agree strongly that such images should never be posted.
Thanks for the tease...now you HAVE to re-post it....so Taint must be working for the secret porno police. Why is his opinion regarding child porn valid? Maybe because he knows the subject intimately???
Last edited by Lurker (2008-02-11 23:10:21)
Offline
