#51 2008-09-16 16:37:31
I hate, hate, hate people ganging up on someone, particularly when that someone has actually devoted a lot of free time to making sure we even have this forum. WTF, who the fuck cares what banners are up and what ones are not. Just because my shitty ones-or your shitty ones aren't picked, Jesus, does it really matter that much to you? Half the posts on here-mine included-are asshats by accident, so I'm not too worried about some precious content being deleted.
Jesus, Zoo, who peed in your cornflakes today to make you come up with such a nasty thread?
Last edited by icangetyouatoe (2008-09-16 16:49:14)
Offline
#52 2008-09-16 16:42:58
Toe is right, Zooks. If you're not happy with something another High Street resident has done, take it up with that member and/or Choad. Otherwise, fucking grow up.
Offline
#53 2008-09-16 16:46:40
icangetyouatoe wrote:
This is total bullshit, is completely unnecessary and I wonder wtf good you thought would come out of posting such a nasty poll.
Fuck you, Zoo.
But you have to admit that Princess Biscuit sucks ass and Pale only did what many of us would like to do, if only to fuck with "it."
But let's change the subject and speculate (again) on who the sockpuppet might be. My vote of for Jadetree, a/k/a, Rip_Van_Uterus. Apparently he's gone legitimate in the frozen north and has his reputation to consider. I'm thinking this is his way to continue to torture us anonymously.
PS -- it's working.
Offline
#54 2008-09-16 16:51:01
headkicker_girl wrote:
icangetyouatoe wrote:
This is total bullshit, is completely unnecessary and I wonder wtf good you thought would come out of posting such a nasty poll.
Fuck you, Zoo.But you have to admit that Princess Biscuit sucks ass and Pale only did what many of us would like to do, if only to fuck with "it."
But let's change the subject and speculate (again) on who the sockpuppet might be. My vote of for Jadetree, a/k/a, Rip_Van_Uterus. Apparently he's gone legitimate in the frozen north and has his reputation to consider. I'm thinking this is his way to continue to torture us anonymously.
PS -- it's working.
Headkicker, you're right. I even changed my post to make it sound less...inflammatory, but you're right. Again. :)
Offline
#55 2008-09-16 16:54:08
Wait. I figured it out. Zoo. Don't you work in the financial industry, like as an analyst or something? If so, I think we can all understand why you might be having a bad day....
Last edited by icangetyouatoe (2008-09-16 17:19:42)
Offline
#56 2008-09-16 17:22:26
icangetyouatoe wrote:
I hate, hate, hate people ganging up on someone,
Being that I'm just one person I'd say I haven't "ganged up on" anyone...
particularly when that someone has actually devoted a lot of free time to making sure we even have this forum. WTF, who the fuck cares what banners are up and what ones are not. Just because my shitty ones-or your shitty ones aren't picked, Jesus, does it really matter that much to you?
Nope. Choad was the one who brought up banners. Ask him.
Half the posts on here-mine included-are asshats by accident, so I'm not too worried about some precious content being deleted.
Fine for you. Others seem do differ (if we are back to the subject of deleting threads).
Jesus, Zoo, who peed in your cornflakes today to make you come up with such a nasty thread?
I stated my motivation in my original post.
Offline
#57 2008-09-16 17:25:09
They are just picking on you, Zookeeper, because you're black. Don't let the bastards get you down.
Offline
#58 2008-09-16 17:26:37
icangetyouatoe wrote:
Wait. I figured it out. Zoo. Don't you work in the financial industry, like as an analyst or something? If so, I think we can all understand why you might be having a bad day....
Nope. I'm an independent software vendor. That is, I develop and sell my own software. I have a new product out and am just getting into the part of my job I most hate: search engine optimization. I'm just learning how to go about it and as I had expected it's a grind and pain to do. I'm just looking for distractions.
Offline
#59 2008-09-16 17:32:02
Hey man, you hiring?
Offline
#60 2008-09-16 17:46:30
chortling
Offline
#61 2008-09-16 17:57:45
icangetyouatoe wrote:
Jesus, does it really matter that much to you?
No.
Jesus, Zoo, who peed in your cornflakes today to make you come up with such a nasty thread?
Not my thread.
Offline
#62 2008-09-16 19:02:57
Zookeeper wrote:
I have a new product out and am just getting into the part of my job I most hate: search engine optimization. I'm just learning how to go about it and as I had expected it's a grind and pain to do. I'm just looking for distractions.
Then you have my heartfelt sympathy. Christ on iceskates, if google isn't the worst fucking documenter of its own code, I don't know who is. And if you find any answers, please, please share them.
Wait a minute. Didn't you cash out and join the leisure class?
Offline
#63 2008-09-16 19:18:52
George Orr wrote:
ptah, I'm ready to take away your chocolate right now. "Mommy-state" my ass--are you capable of communicating without using second- and third-hand buzzwords?
Please see my edited post above yours.
Amen. The only people banning stuff (or wanting to) now are the fucking conservatives. Liberals haven't taken away your right to decide whether or not to have an abortion. Liberals haven't taken your right to have or not have a marriage, either gay or straight. Liberals haven't tried to pull materials from school and public libraries and burn them. Sarah Palin, the current poster-critter for "conservadeeves" would like to do all that, and more. Pee-tah, go back to minding Fudge, and leave political discussion to the grownups who recognize that Fox News and the Washington Times are not news sources.
Offline
#64 2008-09-16 19:18:53
choad wrote:
Wait a minute. Didn't you cash out and join the leisure class?
I cashed out but I didn't get enough from the sale of my old business to retire on. It was enough to sit around watching daytime TV for about six years but after that I'll need to get a job if I don't have money coming in.
Offline
#65 2008-09-16 20:31:17
ptah13 wrote:
I'm not worried about any race war, I'm worried those fuckers will outlaw my guns!!! lol
Hey, I'm having fun, "for the children".
When Oprama outlaws my guns I'll only be an outlaw. lol for the lulz, HI Roger. This thread is a lot more fun with politics involved that it was when it was just bashing Pale.
Offline
#66 2008-09-16 21:21:12
It's been so tempting to delete this message and watch the shit hit the fan, but I...must...resist.
Offline
#67 2008-09-16 21:32:07
tojo2000 wrote:
It's been so tempting to delete this message and watch the shit hit the fan, but I...must...resist.
Do it do it quick before other people see this post!
Offline
#68 2008-09-16 21:43:18
The United States two party system is fucked up at best.... It leaves us arguing back and forth about whether to choose Democrat or Republican when both parties are worthless..... It's time we dumped our celebrity politicians and our political celebrities and put an intellectual in the White House.... By intellectual I don't mean Liberal elitist intellectual either, there is no intelligence there, just pretentiousness.... I won't even start with the Republicans, until they distance themselves from the evangelicals I have nothing good to say about them.....
Offline
#69 2008-09-16 21:47:37
Dirckman wrote:
The United States two party system is fucked up at best.... It leaves us arguing back and forth about whether to choose Democrat or Republican when both parties are worthless..... It's time we dumped our celebrity politicians and our political celebrities and put an intellectual in the White House.... By intellectual I don't mean Liberal elitist intellectual either, there is no intelligence there, just pretentiousness.... I won't even start with the Republicans, until they distance themselves from the evangelicals I have nothing good to say about them.....
I just wish we could vote "no confidence" and make both parties go back and pick new candidates.
Offline
#70 2008-09-16 22:11:18
headkicker_girl wrote:
icangetyouatoe wrote:
This is total bullshit, is completely unnecessary and I wonder wtf good you thought would come out of posting such a nasty poll.
Fuck you, Zoo.But you have to admit that Princess Biscuit sucks ass and Pale only did what many of us would like to do, if only to fuck with "it."
But let's change the subject and speculate (again) on who the sockpuppet might be. My vote of for Jadetree, a/k/a, Rip_Van_Uterus. Apparently he's gone legitimate in the frozen north and has his reputation to consider. I'm thinking this is his way to continue to torture us anonymously.
PS -- it's working.
I also was thinking it might be Jadetree.
Offline
#71 2008-09-16 22:14:33
whiskytangofoxtrot wrote:
The only people banning stuff (or wanting to) now are the fucking conservatives.
Indeed! It's the conservatives in universities that ban "hate speech". It's conservatives who want to bring back the "Fairness Doctrine". It's the conservatives on college campuses who shout down conservative speakers and won't let them speak. Wait...
Offline
#72 2008-09-16 23:12:14
Zookeeper wrote:
whiskytangofoxtrot wrote:
The only people banning stuff (or wanting to) now are the fucking conservatives.
Indeed! It's the conservatives in universities that ban "hate speech". It's conservatives who want to bring back the "Fairness Doctrine". It's the conservatives on college campuses who shout down conservative speakers and won't let them speak. Wait...
I'm sure that out of 300 million people in the U.S. that there has to be at least one of them similar to Thomas Jefferson.... Why don't we find them and put them in office? We need the old school leadership back again rather than the garbage we have to choose from now....
Offline
#73 2008-09-16 23:13:16
My vote is not to ban Pale. I was censored at Cruel and I’ve been banned at Drudge Retort. Thanks to me, rcade had his cabana boys take freedom of speech on his sites out behind the barn and stomp it to death. For his unnecessary act of censorship, I'd like to recommend Pale receive a Tabasco Sauce enema, but I’m afraid he would derive a great deal of sexual pleasure from this which would defeat the purpose.
Last edited by fnord (2008-09-17 00:28:44)
Offline
#74 2008-09-16 23:58:17
Fnord, you know you were banned just because you're black.
Offline
#75 2008-09-17 00:01:16
And Zoo, give me a break, if you're going to gang up on someone, setting up a poll whereby everyone can gratuitously criticize someone, at least take ownership of said gratuitously nasty act and not be such a pussy about it ("I'm just one person" is such a bitchy junior high cheerleader thing to say, sitting in the principals office before suspension for torturing intellectuals in the cafeteria, and we all know that's the same bitchy girl who gets knocked up sophmore year in high school by some employee of Fries and ends up working at Food Parade, fat and bottle blonde for the rest of her life.)
I shall return now to posting cute baby animal pictures on the picture thread. Thank you very much.
Last edited by icangetyouatoe (2008-09-17 00:04:24)
Offline
#76 2008-09-17 01:04:45
Dirckman wrote:
I'm sure that out of 300 million people in the U.S. that there has to be at least one of them similar to Thomas Jefferson.... Why don't we find them and put them in office? We need the old school leadership back again rather than the garbage we have to choose from now....
You'd get my vote Dirckman. Well, first let's hear who your running mate would be. Cherry Vanilla?
Offline
#77 2008-09-17 01:06:02
fnord wrote:
My vote is not to ban Pale.
Huh? Who said anything about banning him?
Offline
#78 2008-09-17 01:16:27
icangetyouatoe wrote:
And Zoo, give me a break, if you're going to gang up on someone, setting up a poll whereby everyone can gratuitously criticize someone, at least take ownership of said gratuitously nasty act and not be such a pussy about it ("I'm just one person" is such a bitchy junior high cheerleader thing to say, sitting in the principals office before suspension for torturing intellectuals in the cafeteria, and we all know that's the same bitchy girl who gets knocked up sophmore year in high school by some employee of Fries and ends up working at Food Parade, fat and bottle blonde for the rest of her life.)
Errr... yeah. Great analogy. I'm a cheerleader here. I'm so popular that everyone just goes along with everything I say. So when I set up that poll I was "ganging up" on Pale since I knew everyone would back me cause they want to be part of my posse. Pale was an innocent victim and everybody voted in favor of his losing his delete key because it was mean old me who set up the poll. For my next feat of strength I'll be overthrowing Choad and seizing control of the site. Nothing can stop me. I control the mob.
I shall return now to posting cute baby animal pictures on the picture thread. Thank you very much.
Hey! Good idea!
Offline
#80 2008-09-17 04:26:42
Pale doesn't deserve the abuse he's getting.
Offline
#81 2008-09-17 10:03:24
Bigcat wrote:
headkicker_girl wrote:
icangetyouatoe wrote:
This is total bullshit, is completely unnecessary and I wonder wtf good you thought would come out of posting such a nasty poll.
Fuck you, Zoo.But you have to admit that Princess Biscuit sucks ass and Pale only did what many of us would like to do, if only to fuck with "it."
But let's change the subject and speculate (again) on who the sockpuppet might be. My vote of for Jadetree, a/k/a, Rip_Van_Uterus. Apparently he's gone legitimate in the frozen north and has his reputation to consider. I'm thinking this is his way to continue to torture us anonymously.
PS -- it's working.I also was thinking it might be Jadetree.
I must have missed something. Jade was a legitimate contributor. What would be the impetus for him going rogue and becoming a troll without maintaining his former personality?
Offline
#82 2008-09-17 11:04:05
square wrote:
Pale doesn't deserve the abuse he's getting.
True, which is why we should talk about something else in this thread. Stupid people shouldn't breed. There haven't been enough nazi references in this thread yet. Lets talk about how Obama thinks eugenics is a change we need.
Offline
#83 2008-09-17 11:07:20
McCain's gonna neutron bomb the poor to revitalize the economy. Bye bye, citizens of Detroit!
Offline
#84 2008-09-17 11:39:30
jesusluvspegging wrote:
McCain's gonna neutron bomb the poor to revitalize the economy. Bye bye, citizens of Detroit!
That's the spirit.
Offline
#85 2008-09-17 14:52:18
PERSONAL MSSG:
Roger_That wrote:
pALEPHx wrote:
BLAH BLAH BLAH Windbag BLAH BLAH BLAH Windbag
Hey Rog - thanks for the pics. I think you're right, the left one hangs a little lower than the right.
As for this stupid thread, I voted to ban pENIx, but only because he's a cocksucking faggot - in theory, I'm in favour of censorship, as long as it punishes and suppresses my enemies.
On another note, Zoochini certainly is becoming an uppity cuss, ain't he? What do you think happened - he lay dormant for years, now he's up and angry. Do you think it's the male nigger menopause (MNM)?
On yet another note, I just spent five days in Thailand banging underage shemales. It was fabulous - practically the only difference between a Thai boycunt and a real vagina is the smell. Much to my delight, I think I caught the syph, and I want to share the genius. Seeing as it's not sailing season (or is it? What do I know, I'm a Zodiacker), how about we make a baby for you to look after - guaranteed high IQ and EQ. Anyways, my syph probably cancels out your little peccadildo, so why not come for a visit? The only thing wetter than Vancouver in the winter are the girls who yowl outside my window at night - you'll enjoy waving to them as you churn yourself to butter on my crow-nested spar.
Take care - hope to see you, WCL
Offline
#86 2008-09-17 15:07:48
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
On another note, Zoochini certainly is becoming an uppity cuss, ain't he? What do you think happened - he lay dormant for years, now he's up and angry.
I'm bored and trying to avoid work I don't want to do.
By the way, like the Zoochini pun!
Offline
#87 2008-09-17 16:21:38
I vote we continue to torment Pale.
That and more tentacle on the sidebar.
Offline
#88 2008-09-17 17:28:25
opsec wrote:
I vote we continue to torment Pale.
That and more tentacle on the sidebar.
And more cow bell. Don't forget the cow bell!
Offline
#89 2008-09-17 18:22:48
opsec wrote:
I vote we continue to torment Pale.
In Vancouver - but it probably started in Fagtown USA - the local sodomites paint pink triangles on the cement every time and every where a fag bashing takes place. (I know all the spots - the VHS {Vancouver Homophobe Society} visits them for picnics and badminton tournaments.) Could we institute something like that on H-S?
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by WilberCuntLicker (2008-09-17 19:13:47)
Offline
#90 2008-09-17 22:41:31
jesusluvspegging wrote:
McCain's gonna neutron bomb the poor to revitalize the economy. Bye bye, citizens of Detroit!
You say that like it's a bad thing...
Offline
#91 2008-09-17 23:55:24
pALEPHx wrote:
I stand by my decisions. Why not? Nobody else does. If people would prefer to have an anonymous shitball posting My Little Pony crap over and over without interacting, then so be it. But don't make it appear as if I'm deleting posts. You know perfectly well what the implication is there, and it's not the same as raking the drivel out of sight before it becomes just another troll-feeder.
Have you ever thought about putting a new thread up called "Trolls" and just MOVING blatantly annoying threads there? That way, it's not censorship, but totally annoying trolls like Miz Bizcuit will only be viewed by people who WANT to feed the troll.
Offline
#92 2008-09-18 00:09:10
hedgewizard wrote:
square wrote:
Pale doesn't deserve the abuse he's getting.
Lets talk about how Obama thinks eugenics is a change we need.
All the more reason for me to walk precincts for him.
Offline
#93 2008-09-18 01:15:33
feisty wrote:
pALEPHx wrote:
I stand by my decisions. Why not? Nobody else does. If people would prefer to have an anonymous shitball posting My Little Pony crap over and over without interacting, then so be it. But don't make it appear as if I'm deleting posts. You know perfectly well what the implication is there, and it's not the same as raking the drivel out of sight before it becomes just another troll-feeder.
Have you ever thought about putting a new thread up called "Trolls" and just MOVING blatantly annoying threads there? That way, it's not censorship
Sorry feisty but yes that would be censorship. If somebody ushered you into an empty room every time you tried to say something to a group of people you would say you were being censored.
For shit sake people, she isn't any real nuisance. Yeah, she caused a shit storm one night but she hasn't had a repeat performance. Nobody had a fit when Kathetersong (or whatever his name was) did his drive-by posting on Cruel.com without ever actually interacting with anyone.
- Everybody knows who she is and can opt to not open her threads if they don't want to.
- She posts maybe twice a week.
- There's an ignore feature here.
Offline
#94 2008-09-18 01:30:11
Last edited by icangetyouatoe (2008-09-18 01:40:17)
Offline
#95 2008-09-19 01:15:01
I didn't mean to move her every time she posts... only when she's trolling. What if we added it to our ridiculous number of sticky threads? Then it might be advantageous to be a troll... your posts would always be easy to find.
I personally don't care. I like feeding the trolls. I just figured it might be a decent compromise.
Offline
#96 2008-09-19 01:16:56
feisty wrote:
Have you ever thought about putting a new thread up called "Trolls" and just MOVING blatantly annoying threads there?
Or we could just change the button up at the top that says "High-Street Forum" to say "Trolls," I believe it would work out about the same.
Offline
#97 2008-09-19 13:22:38
jesusluvspegging wrote:
feisty wrote:
Have you ever thought about putting a new thread up called "Trolls" and just MOVING blatantly annoying threads there?
Or we could just change the button up at the top that says "High-Street Forum" to say "Trolls," I believe it would work out about the same.
Good point.
Offline
#98 2008-09-19 14:35:57
feisty wrote:
jesusluvspegging wrote:
feisty wrote:
Have you ever thought about putting a new thread up called "Trolls" and just MOVING blatantly annoying threads there?
Or we could just change the button up at the top that says "High-Street Forum" to say "Trolls," I believe it would work out about the same.
Good point.
It cracks me up when people bitch about feeding trolls on this board. If we don't each do our part to feed each other, where the fuck are we gonna get our lulz?
Offline
#99 2008-09-20 03:24:50
Zookeeper wrote:
For shit sake people, she isn't any real nuisance. Yeah, she caused a shit storm one night but she hasn't had a repeat performance. Nobody had a fit when Kathetersong (or whatever his name was) did his drive-by posting on Cruel.com without ever actually interacting with anyone.
Hey . . . Kathy submitted more original contributions to Cruel than all of us combined and don't you fore-get it! Hell, the "CIA stole my penis" bit was one of the greatest running-gags in all of internets history as far as I'm concerned.
Offline
#100 2008-09-22 16:04:07
This one still seems relevant....
Offline