#2 2008-12-09 09:46:47

"This is a wake-up call," Knight said. "It's not just that these kids are poor and more likely to have health problems, but they might actually not be getting full brain development from the stressful and relatively impoverished environment associated with low socioeconomic status: fewer books, less reading, fewer games, fewer visits to museums."

Umm... and this is a surprise, how?

http://somecallmeduh.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/captainobvious.jpg

Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-12-09 09:52:24)

Offline

 

#3 2008-12-09 14:28:41

Uh, how is the Fnord candy?  It said POOR kids..not black kids.  THat would imply that poor white kids have different brains too.

Offline

 

#4 2008-12-09 15:33:15

headkicker_girl wrote:

THat would imply that poor white kids have different brains too.

Correct. Nearly all children from lower socioeconomic classes report this sort of atrophy. Parents, sign those permission slips! Go to parent-teacher conferences! Use Obama-level vocabulary inside the home from an early age!

Offline

 

#5 2008-12-09 15:37:05

pALEPHx wrote:

headkicker_girl wrote:

THat would imply that poor white kids have different brains too.

Correct. Nearly all children from lower socioeconomic classes report this sort of atrophy. Parents, sign those permission slips! Go to parent-teacher conferences! Use Obama-level vocabulary inside the home from an early age!

Well now we know why forti is slow on the uptake...

Offline

 

#6 2008-12-09 18:24:11

headkicker_girl wrote:

Well now we know why forti is slow on the uptake...

Well, the same group is also prone to eat lead-based paints, so it's all pretty fair game.

https://cruelery.com/uploads/thumbs/47_lead-based-paint-704673.jpg

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

Last edited by pALEPHx (2008-12-09 18:28:21)

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com