Woof.

And, an assistance dog for every veteran.  Nice idea, really.

She looks moderately better here.  Moderately.

However, he looks like he's more suited to cruising gay leather bars.

Emmeran wrote:

whosasailorthen wrote:

She looks moderately better here.  Moderately.

However, he looks like he's more suited to cruising gay leather bars.

http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20090723/capt. … _ny131.jpg

I don't know - that throat looks like a nice place to be....

His or Hers Em?  I am worried here.  You are Het, right?

The board is lookin' awfully pink lately.  Colour me confused, bemused, amused...

Still rabidly hetero.

orangeplus wrote:

just a matter of time

Yep... just a matter of time... and once I've joined the choir invisible you're welcome to sodomize my corpse to your heart's content. 

But do film it for this website, won't you?

By way of response and as if it matters to anyone here... I'm still devoutly heterosexual.  I like women, women of all the various races, creeds and social strata.  Short or tall, fat or skinny, virgin or slut...I likes them all.

But to tip my hat to our less than manly male community, I'm not sure that I'd care if that woman had not always been a woman - never tested that theory but I've applied the "duck" logic to it.  I.E. - if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it's a fucking duck.  So long as it ain't a duck with a dick I'm not sure I'd care over the short term.

I do sometimes wonder if we're obligated to find something more shocking. As Cruel inheritors, should we avoid stealing from alternate sources or RSS feeds (I don't wanna know who has what). Are we done with our heritage? Can we pull links without any level of digust/mistrust or debauch? BTW, I'm glad Emmeran is hetero. I was worried some other homo might accidentally want him. Such a shame that he's worried enough to announce it. Hey, pal, can you post a pic of your cock so the rest of us can know what we can't have?

karenw wrote:

pALEPHx wrote:

I do sometimes wonder if we're obligated to find something more shocking. As Cruel inheritors, should we avoid stealing from alternate sources or RSS feeds (I don't wanna know who has what). Are we done with our heritage? Can we pull links without any level of digust/mistrust or debauch?

From Merriam-Webster:

Main Entry:
    we Listen to the pronunciation of we
Pronunciation:
    \ˈwē\
Function:
    pronoun, plural in construction
Etymology:
    Middle English, from Old English wē; akin to Old High German wir we, Sanskrit vayam
Date:
    before 12th century

1 : I and the rest of a group that includes me : you and I : you and I and another or others : I and another or others not including you —used as pronoun of the first person plural — compare i, our, ours, us 2 : 1i —used by sovereigns —used by writers to keep an impersonal character

For someone who adds little in the way of links, you throw around the first person pronoun far too much.

Or do you fancy yourself our queen, looking down your nose and using "we" to patronize the worker bees?

Fuck you, Karen.

Pale, honey, I've always rather enjoyed your posting; however, of late, you have become shrill, un-funny, and sadly predictable.

Take 2 and call us in the morning, mmmmkay?



Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs