#2 2009-08-27 18:54:59
Given that the Republicans have sent many plants to disrupt these meetings at the behest of their masters from the Medical-Industrial Complex, it’s not unreasonable to question the chlorophyll level possessed by a questioner.
Offline
#3 2009-08-27 19:10:31
They don't need plants, all the losers and freaks have been trimmed from the payrolls so they are available to attend Town Halls all day long.
All I can say is "Good Deal, at least they are bugging me in the lunch room"
Offline
#4 2009-08-27 19:51:38
It may sound rather simplistic; But, I can't sup-port the third 'Merican revolution under these ass-holes for the simple reason of their ob-viously fuck-tarded priorities:
1) Il-Legal in-vasion of a sovereign nation = "How dare you question der fuhrer during time of war".
compared to: 2) "Providing health-care for the poor will de-stroy our nation".
And, yeah, I'm ob-viously para-phrasing on both of those; But, I do feel that I've "cap-tured" the basic in-tent.
Post-Script: And, as much as I dis-a-prove of Obama, why do all of the Republicunt "talking-heads" con-tinue to blame him for the defecit that Shrub created as well as Shrub's socializing the banking in-dustry? Is their short-term memory really that fucked?
Last edited by Decadence (2009-08-27 19:55:06)
Offline
#5 2009-08-27 23:58:17
Decadence wrote:
why do all of the Republicunt "talking-heads" con-tinue to blame him for the defecit that Shrub created as well as Shrub's socializing the banking in-dustry? Is their short-term memory really that fucked?
The blame game is rampant in politics. Both sides are now so far apart they can't see even a slight resemblance to the other. Hell, it's still Clinton's fault. He got a blowjob.
Or are we being played by both sides because lobbyists control the real agenda? Maybe I have been watching too many conspiracy theory films lately.
Offline
#6 2009-08-28 00:59:52
doesyourpussyhurt wrote:
Hell, it's still Clinton's fault. He got a blowjob.
And, all that I got was this lousy, bottomed-out, economy.
doesyourpussyhurt wrote:
Maybe I have been watching too many conspiracy theory films lately.
There's no such thing as "too much" there, dude. If I've learned one thing in all of these wasted years, it's that one can-not be "too paranoid".
Offline
#7 2009-08-28 07:01:50
Decadence wrote:
If I've learned one thing in all of these wasted years, it's that one can-not be "too paranoid".
Maybe one can be?
Offline
#8 2009-08-28 10:37:52
Decadence wrote:
doesyourpussyhurt wrote:
Hell, it's still Clinton's fault. He got a blowjob.
And, all that I got was this lousy, bottomed-out, economy.
doesyourpussyhurt wrote:
Maybe I have been watching too many conspiracy theory films lately.
There's no such thing as "too much" there, dude. If I've learned one thing in all of these wasted years, it's that one can-not be "too paranoid".
Get over it
Last edited by Emmeran (2009-08-28 10:38:11)
Offline
#9 2009-08-28 11:55:34
Emmeran wrote:
Get over it
No, hey, I a-gree that it only makes sense that a building damaged primarily in the front right quarter would collapse up-on it-self "in one fell-swoop". Just be-cause in-tense heat from flames never brought down a steel-structured building prior to that day is no reason to be-lieve that three of them couldn't suddenly collapse on the same day as a re-sult.
Now, what time is "Two And A Half Men On"?
Offline
#10 2009-08-28 12:09:37
Dec wrote:
Post-Script: And, as much as I dis-a-prove of Obama, why do all of the Republicunt "talking-heads" con-tinue to blame him for the defecit that Shrub created as well as Shrub's socializing the banking in-dustry? Is their short-term memory really that fucked?
Maybe because Obama has ncreased the budget deficit in one year by more than Bush did in a combined eight years. The banking bailouts (a bi-partisan project) will be paid back, but Obama's social programs (all Democrat) are here forever.
Offline
#11 2009-08-28 12:20:42
phreddy wrote:
Dec wrote:
Post-Script: And, as much as I dis-a-prove of Obama, why do all of the Republicunt "talking-heads" con-tinue to blame him for the defecit that Shrub created as well as Shrub's socializing the banking in-dustry? Is their short-term memory really that fucked?
Maybe because Obama has ncreased the budget deficit in one year by more than Bush did in a combined eight years. The banking bailouts (a bi-partisan project) will be paid back, but Obama's social programs (all Democrat) are here forever.
A bad link to a Heritage Foundation comparison that try's to defend Bush is just ridiculous, this is just further proof that you are not commenting on the issues but merely screaming loudly against anything done by the democrats.
If you want to be respected around here you are going to have to start looking at the issues from a non-partisian point of view, touting republican party lines is really sad and pitiful.
Offline
#12 2009-08-28 12:22:46
Decadence wrote:
Emmeran wrote:
Get over it
No, hey, I a-gree that it only makes sense that a building damaged primarily in the front right quarter would collapse up-on it-self "in one fell-swoop". Just be-cause in-tense heat from flames never brought down a steel-structured building prior to that day is no reason to be-lieve that three of them couldn't suddenly collapse on the same day as a re-sult.
I tend to agree with you, but unless everyone involved in said plot were stuffed inside boxes that were stowed in the cargo bays of those 767's it could never be kept quiet.
Last edited by Emmeran (2009-08-28 12:23:09)
Offline
#13 2009-08-28 12:30:55
Emmeran wrote:
I tend to agree with you, but unless everyone involved in said plot were stuffed inside boxes that were stowed in the cargo bays of those 767's it could never be kept quiet.
You don't think? MK-Ultra re-quired many more participants, and that took over three decades to "come to light".
Offline
#14 2009-08-28 12:40:44
Em wrote:
If you want to be respected around here you are going to have to start looking at the issues from a non-partisian point of view, touting republican party lines is really sad and pitiful.
You lame idiot. The numbers are what they are, regardless of where they are published. Unfortunately, the Obama media won't put them out there, so I have referred you to someone who will.
Here are some links to this info for you:
Original link.
Another link
Last edited by phreddy (2009-08-28 12:44:37)
Offline
#15 2009-08-28 12:42:40
phreddy wrote:
Em wrote:
If you want to be respected around here you are going to have to start looking at the issues from a non-partisian point of view, touting republican party lines is really sad and pitiful.
You lame idiot. The numbers are what they are, regardless of where they are published. Unfortunately, the Obama media won't put them out there, so I have referred you to someone who will.
The figures never lie, but liars can figure
Every accountant knows that if you torture the numbers long enough they will say exactly what you want them to say
Get your head out of your ass
Offline
#16 2009-08-28 12:46:42
The figures in the links I provided are provided by the CBO and Obama himself. So go fuck yourself Em.
Offline
#17 2009-08-28 12:55:46
phreddy wrote:
Em wrote:
If you want to be respected around here you are going to have to start looking at the issues from a non-partisian point of view, touting republican party lines is really sad and pitiful.
You lame idiot. The numbers are what they are, regardless of where they are published. Unfortunately, the Obama media won't put them out there, so I have referred you to someone who will.
Here are some links to this info for you:
Original link.
Another link
damned if you didn't post a link that refer'd to the link you posted before it which was an article from what is basically the Rush Limbaugh Institute. Now that is a bold move...
Wait - I like this part the best....
Heritage Foundation wrote:
■ President Bush tilted the income tax burden more toward upper-income taxpayers
See, this is what is great about the extremists - they know that the bolder the lie the more apt it is to be believed. (Pass me another round of Cap Gains tax cuts please, it's my particular favorite during a market boom)
Offline
