#1 2010-01-11 12:27:10
because you are one ugly smanly lookin' Ruth Buzzie doll. But I spent 7K on you so, IT"S ON BABY!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,582 … latestnews
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2 2010-01-11 18:55:30
I as-sume that your in-tent was to hyper-link to "Sex robot wants to know the ‘real you’" as op-posed to the "Perfectly Good White Girl" up-date.
Offline
#3 2010-01-11 19:15:46
Decadence wrote:
I as-sume that your in-tent was to hyper-link to "Sex robot wants to know the ‘real you’" as op-posed to the "Perfectly Good White Girl" up-date.
WTF? Talking? Companionship?
Men only talk to women in order to get the sex, if we want companionship we get a dog.
Offline
#4 2010-01-11 19:39:28
artificial intelligence expert David Levy argues that robots will become significant sexual partners for humans, answering needs that other people are unable or unwilling to satisfy.
Here in San Francisco I doubt there is a need that someone is not willingly fulfilling.
Offline
#5 2010-01-11 20:50:17
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
artificial intelligence expert David Levy argues that robots will become significant sexual partners for humans, answering needs that other people are unable or unwilling to satisfy.
Here in San Francisco I doubt there is a need that someone is not willingly fulfilling.
My take is that anything that keeps social defectives (i.e., those who can't or won't make a go of a real relationship with a real human) off the streets and out of the gene pool is a benefit to humanity.
But I said the same thing about RealDolls, and really, this is just RealDoll 2.0--or maybe just RealDoll 1.5.
Offline
#6 2010-01-11 21:32:13
Hmmm,
while out of sight and out of mind seems like a good idea at first blush, the social defectives will still find a way to breed when they periodically come out from behind closed doors for processed food products.
It never ceases to amaze me the way every one of us monkeys gets an evolutionary chance to procreate. There really is someone for everyone. No mater how sociopathic your social skills are.
Can we program the real dolls with mad child rearing skilz? Or at the very least cover them with fur like the wire mother experiments done with monkeys raised in isolation boxes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLrBrk9DXVk
Of course we can always tell them that either they stay off the streets or we replace their real dolls with a
"Pit of Despair"
Harlow was well known for refusing to use conventional terminology, and instead chose deliberately outrageous terms for the experimental apparatus he devised. The tendency arose from an early conflict with the conventional psychological establishment in which Harlow used the term "love" in place of the popular and archaically correct term, "attachment." Such terms and respective devices included a forced-mating device he called the "rape rack," tormenting surrogate mother devices he called "Iron maidens," and an isolation chamber he called the "pit of despair" ...
In the latter of these devices, alternatively called the "well of despair," baby monkeys were left alone in darkness for up to one year from birth, or repetitively separated from their peers and isolated in the chamber. These procedures quickly produced monkeys that were severely psychologically disturbed and declared to be valuable models of human depression.[16]
Harlow tried to rehabilitate monkeys that had been subjected to varying degrees of isolation using various forms of therapy. "In our study of psychopathology, we began as sadists trying to produce abnormality. Today we are psychiatrists trying to achieve normality and equanimity."
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by Johnny_Rotten (2010-01-11 21:38:26)
Offline
#7 2010-01-11 22:26:20
I remember seeing the original documentary at some point in my childhood. It was fascinating and truly heartbreaking. I still remember sensing Harlow's grimness at what he felt he had to do to these animals in order to acquire this valuable data. Of course I was very saddened by the wretched little monkeys, but I also got a very strong sense of how important this research might be to learning about human development.
Many, many years later, as an adult, I saw a follow-up documentary which tracks the attempts at rehabilitating the monkey subjects. Naturally, the doc took a very positive (and sentimental) spin on events; but I just felt extremely gratified, somehow, that any researcher would expend the time and resources to attempt to ameliorate the damage they had done to their animal subjects (and of course I do realize that the rehab attempt itself would have yielded up additional valuable data).
Offline
#8 2010-01-11 23:20:23
Roxxy fell off the latest news page and is now here.
Robotic movement is built into "the three inputs"
I guess that makes it less like necrophilia. But "the three inputs"? Sounds tantric.
Offline
#9 2010-01-12 11:58:16
George Orr wrote:
I remember seeing the original documentary at some point in my childhood. It was fascinating and truly heartbreaking. I still remember sensing Harlow's grimness at what he felt he had to do to these animals in order to acquire this valuable data. Of course I was very saddened by the wretched little monkeys, but I also got a very strong sense of how important this research might be to learning about human development.
Many, many years later, as an adult, I saw a follow-up documentary which tracks the attempts at rehabilitating the monkey subjects. Naturally, the doc took a very positive (and sentimental) spin on events; but I just felt extremely gratified, somehow, that any researcher would expend the time and resources to attempt to ameliorate the damage they had done to their animal subjects (and of course I do realize that the rehab attempt itself would have yielded up additional valuable data).
Ah George,
You are a girl after my own heart. Isn't it amazing what they will let you do when you don the starched white lab coat. Even when the brains end up scrambled beyond all hope the girls in the lab still find you kindly.
You would have made the hottest Inga to Young Dr. Fronkensteen
"I am not a Frankenstein. I'm a Fronkensteen. Don't give me that. I don't believe in fate. And I won't say it. "
Offline
