#2 2010-04-20 16:32:23
Saw this today. How dare they think that Mohamed would dress as a bear... a rabbit yes, but a bear?
Offline
#4 2010-04-20 16:51:21
They seem to enjoy picking on the Mormons.
Of course, as I recall, they've blasted the Catholic Church, Scientology, circumcision and fundies, along with pretty much every other aspect of Western Civilization. They have been on the air for something like thirteen years, after all.
Offline
#5 2010-04-20 16:59:31
George Orr wrote:
They seem to enjoy picking on the Mormons.
Of course, as I recall, they've blasted the Catholic Church, Scientology, circumcision and fundies, along with pretty much every other aspect of Western Civilization. They have been on the air for something like thirteen years, after all.
and don't forget the Canucks!! They aimed an entire movie at Canada.
Offline
#6 2010-04-20 17:16:34
Emmeran wrote:
and don't forget the Canucks!! They aimed an entire movie at Canada.
The songs from that movie are awesome.
Offline
#7 2010-04-20 19:10:56
The only major world religion I have negative feelings about is Islam, because Muslims are not able to live in peace around people of other religions. Most of the world’s wars and insurrections involve Muslims killing Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, Animists, or followers of some other religion. Islam is the booger covered, non-toilet trained tard among the world’s religions!
Offline
#8 2010-04-20 19:22:07
fnord wrote:
Most of the world’s wars and insurrections involve Muslims killing Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, Animists, or followers of some other religion.
That fucking statement is incorrect, fnord.
Last edited by MSG Tripps (2010-04-20 19:24:22)
Offline
#9 2010-04-20 19:32:56
MSG Tripps wrote:
fnord wrote:
Most of the world’s wars and insurrections involve Muslims killing Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, Animists, or followers of some other religion.
That fucking statement is incorrect, fnord.
I'll stand with the old army dog on this one, the Xtians are the most frequent and best at killing their neighbors - we've held that title for millenium.
Offline
#10 2010-04-20 19:39:29
I'm lock step with our version of the military, OMG.
Offline
#11 2010-04-20 19:42:34
Emmeran wrote:
MSG Tripps wrote:
fnord wrote:
Most of the world’s wars and insurrections involve Muslims killing Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, Animists, or followers of some other religion.
That fucking statement is incorrect, fnord.
I'll stand with the old army dog on this one, the Xtians are the most frequent and best at killing their neighbors - we've held that title for millenium.
Sadly, Buddhists aren't clear on this one, either, although it's certainly not common. Japanese Buddhist complicity with the Japanese government during World War II as well as complicity with the government in Sri Lanka during that country's recent civil war, to say nothing of Buddhist-on-Muslim violence in southern Thailand all point to moral failure.
Hindus, too, have a lovely history of attacking their Muslim neighbors and the odd Christian, as well as the other way around.
Offline
#12 2010-04-20 19:43:07
Emmeran wrote:
the Xtians are the most frequent and best at killing their neighbors - we've held that title for millenium.
Hey Jarhead.
Not to mention the godless communists, east and west.
The pork haters are down the list.
Offline
#13 2010-04-20 19:55:55
MSG Tripps wrote:
The pork haters are down the list.
Well, what do you expect?? Muslims can have 3 wives and the Jews have money to make.
It's the rest of us with our fat old wives and failed businesses that look to get our kicks another way.
Offline
#16 2010-04-26 19:50:06
Keep UP! Jarheads use FB, in fact my son's good friend who just got back from basic is on it. Move with the times, there are new territories for you to conquer Sarge!
Offline
#17 2010-04-26 19:51:49
Family mate, I find Facebook far superior to breathing the same air with any of my extended family; and of course phone calls are right the fuck out - I hate the fucking telephone.
Offline
#18 2010-04-26 19:55:21
Eat the apple, Jarhead.
This old lifer don't fuck with no stinking facebook.
Point is; should secure facebook links be a part of this place?
Offline
#19 2010-04-26 19:59:34
Are you voting for limits?
Offline
#20 2010-04-26 20:01:11
Dmtdust wrote:
Are you voting for limits?
Are you asking me a question?
Offline
#21 2010-04-26 20:14:22
yes. This reminds me of where we were with Youtube when it first came on the scene.
Offline
#22 2010-04-26 20:19:01
Dmtdust wrote:
This reminds me of where we were with Youtube when it first came on the scene.
No, it is not akin to that. Youtube requires no login to participate.
Offline
#23 2010-04-26 20:21:40
I see where this is going, valid concern. Over and out.
Offline
#24 2010-04-26 20:51:51
MSG Tripps wrote:
No, it is not akin to that. Youtube requires no login to participate.
Ah, that had slipped my mind.
Well, in future, we should link to the original page rather than an FB entry. And screencap's always better if you want to show people a Facebook page for some reason (just like with Craigslist).
Offline
#25 2010-04-26 21:10:35
George Orr wrote:
Well, in future, we should link to the original page rather than an FB entry. And screencap's always better if you want to show people a Facebook page for some reason (just like with Craigslist).
That sounds like an idea.
Hey George Orr.
Offline
#26 2010-04-26 21:19:08
Hey Jarhead; Dmtdust said, Over and out.
Offline
#27 2010-04-26 21:21:38
Fivers Top
Offline