#2 2010-11-20 19:17:48
Hmm. I guess I see a real distinction between sexual desires and romantic attraction.
I think of bi-sexuals as folks who desire and enjoy *sex* with both men and women, but for whom actual romantic desire and attractiveness (read: fall in love) is found only in the opposite sex.
I'm not sure there's really a word yet for someone who can truly fall in love with either a man or a woman with equanimity. You call call them 'pan-sexual', but again, that's really just a statement about sexuality, not so much about relationships.
Offline
#3 2010-11-20 22:48:15
The word is "Polyamorous".
Offline
#4 2010-11-20 22:50:28
I think "In Denial" is the correct terminology. If Black, then "Down Low" is the correct term.
Offline
#5 2010-11-21 00:09:56
fnord wrote:
I think "In Denial" is the correct terminology. If Black, then "Down Low" is the correct term.
Typical, the fag's want anyone who isn't absolutely and unconditionally straight to be on their side; they need the numbers to help justify their existence.
The rest of us casually write this activity off as yet another border fringe of humanity, just another example of production exceptions due to the lack of a quality assurance process in the human reproductive process. But the desire to be accepted as normal twists the perception of the homosexual society to the point that any shred of documentation regardless of how tainted will be paraded or demeaned regardless of the purity of the data. Simply put, the fudge packers want to be normal and refuse to accept the fact that they are the exception; any evidence contrary to their claim dilutes their statistics and reveals more of the truth.
The fact remains that while they don't get to choose their sexuality they are still an odd lot on the fringe of humanity; nature herself has insured that genectically speaking they are assured to be the end of their respective genetic lines. Ergo, they will continue to occur and should be afforded every right and respect given to every other human but outside of any other consideration they remain queer.
Sorry Fnord.
Offline
#6 2010-11-21 01:10:15
These are men who voluntarily have sex with men, and/or have romantic feelings for other men, and say they aren't gay or bi; in denial is the only way you can describe such men. And no, speaking for the vast Organized Gay Conspiracy, we don't necessarily want all of these people to be counted as ours. Only the good-looking and otherwise sane ones!
Last edited by fnord (2010-11-21 01:48:35)
Offline
#7 2010-11-21 19:20:08
And don't forget that a certain segment of the population isn't really Bi, more like just desperately lonely. They will take anyone, anyTHING as an emotional and physical attachment.
Offline
#8 2010-11-22 11:02:25
GooberMcNutly wrote:
And don't forget that a certain segment of the population isn't really Bi, more like just desperately lonely. They will take anyone, anyTHING as an emotional and physical attachment.
Don't fret Goober. It gets better.
Heh, just kidding, may your boat be rocked till the end of your days.
Online
#9 2010-11-22 17:03:59
GooberMcNutly wrote:
And don't forget that a certain segment of the population isn't really Bi, more like just desperately lonely. They will take anyone, anyTHING as an emotional and physical attachment.
Don't worry Goob, lots of kids grew up on a farms :)
Offline
#10 2010-11-22 19:52:32
fnord wrote:
These are men who voluntarily have sex with men, and/or have romantic feelings for other men, and say they aren't gay or bi; in denial is the only way you can describe such men. And no, speaking for the vast Organized Gay Conspiracy, we don't necessarily want all of these people to be counted as ours. Only the good-looking and otherwise sane ones!
Damn you for refusing to be trolled.
Offline
#11 2010-11-22 23:08:50
fnord wrote:
Only the good-looking and otherwise sane ones!
You forgot hung!
Offline
#12 2010-11-23 03:46:04
doesyourpussyhurt wrote:
fnord wrote:
Only the good-looking and otherwise sane ones!
You forgot hung!
There is no such thing as an ugly hung man!
Offline
#13 2010-11-23 09:03:46
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
Don't fret Goober. It gets better.
Ha!
I have a middle aged wife, I know it gets better. Mrs. Goober has blossomed like a dirty little flower under the tidal surge of hormones that kick in when women get to a certain age as well as the realization that prudery is only going to hurt herself in the long run.
Actually, I was thinking of a certain relative of mine. He had a very introverted, uber-nerdly, isolated adolescence and he used to latch onto anything with a pulse. At least in the last couple of years he has found a partner as nerdly as himself (a rare bird indeed!) and they have settled down into some kind of WoW and computer-building based bliss.
Offline
