#1 2012-01-07 15:28:35

Offline

 

#2 2012-01-07 17:19:34

That is so...mundane, and simultaneously so precious and beautiful.  A lot of the things I heard said remind me of my own marriage.

Offline

 

#3 2012-01-07 21:14:27

Eggs-actly.

Offline

 

#4 2012-01-07 22:23:24

People who think like Santorum would look at these two people and see monsters.  I'm completely serious.  I know people like that (to my lasting regret).

Offline

 

#5 2012-01-07 22:57:12

George Orr wrote:

People who think like Santorum would look at these two people and see monsters.  I'm completely serious.  I know people like that (to my lasting regret).

That fundamental fear and ignorance of human sexuality is still shared by, what, most of the population? All but one of my immediate family, anyway.

Offline

 

#6 2012-01-07 23:00:45

George Orr wrote:

People who think like Santorum would look at these two people and see monsters.  I'm completely serious.  I know people like that (to my lasting regret).

What they fear most is people who won't submit to domination. Ironic, really.

Offline

 

#7 2012-01-09 19:43:37

Iowa Caucus Rigged? - MarmiteMan4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrH7w6kr … ideo_title

How do you explain Ron Paul finishing third when he was certain to finish first within days of the vote. How did Rick Santorum finish second when he has had barely any support?

Offline

 

#8 2012-01-09 23:33:05

I could also never figure out why straight people are so threatened by the very concept of homosexuals. What is everyone so afraid of? That everyone will go gay and the species will die out? That homos will be so desirable that straight people will turn away from their partners for nonstop faggy debauchery? There I would be, knocking the bottom out of my wife, thinking "If only gay people could marry, I would be out of here in a second. Too bad it's not legal. I guess I have to stay married to my old lady...".

Offline

 

#9 2012-01-10 00:16:18

GooberMcNutly wrote:

I could also never figure out why straight people are so threatened by the very concept of homosexuals. What is everyone so afraid of? That everyone will go gay and the species will die out? That homos will be so desirable that straight people will turn away from their partners for nonstop faggy debauchery? There I would be, knocking the bottom out of my wife, thinking "If only gay people could marry, I would be out of here in a second. Too bad it's not legal. I guess I have to stay married to my old lady...".

Best read in Louis CK's voice.  Thanks for that Goob!

Offline

 

#10 2012-01-10 00:29:13

If marriage is "sacred" why's divorce so popular?

Hell,  if the We're Christians Not Bigots hate gays so much, they oughta insist gays get married, so they can undergo painful contested divorces.

Offline

 

#11 2012-01-10 08:21:24

I can just say that I have been married for 15 years, about 30% of my friends are gay and I have never felt "threatened" in my relationship because of it.

It's like the dichotomy where bigots can simultaneously hold the beliefs that a) gays are weak, effeminate nancy-bois and b) they don't want to be alone in a room with one or they will get ass raped.

I just always figured that insecure men were afraid that fags would see their penis and think "Eh, I've seen better". It also explains why the same people think that women should remain virgins until marriage.

Last edited by GooberMcNutly (2012-01-10 08:23:34)

Offline

 

#12 2012-01-10 09:01:03

If marriage were "sacred" you could get married in a church without a license, even in states without common-law marriage. The fact that no state will allow you divorced in a church should be enough to convince any rational person of the secular nature of marriage. The fact that all states claim to regulate and promote marriage because they have an interest in promoting stable households should be enough to convince any rational person to support same sex marriage, even without invoking the concept of equal protection under the law.

I've often observed that those straight people who understand homosexuality and know for a fact and in detail that they are not gay are also the same ones who do not feel threatened by homosexuality.

Offline

 

#13 2012-01-10 13:33:36

(Rubs hands together and smiles maliciously) Heh, heh. Our evil plan is working.

Offline

 

#14 2012-01-22 17:19:18

They won’t let Ron Paul win though he deserves the first in Iowa. So in critical moment, there is an inexplicable Santorum jumping out. Distract your doubt. That’s evidently a rigged election. If they could cheat you into a war by fake “WMD”, if they could cheat you with a false flag 911 attack, would that be easy to cheat you in those elections where the vote counting can never be verified.

They select their favorable puppet by rigged election. (they control the voting system through intelligence – FBI) They justify the election result by fake poll. (Through controlled media)

Offline

 

#15 2012-01-23 01:25:24

Kathy, it's pretty obvious the system is rigged.  It appears the Republicans are throwing (or have been told to throw) this election.  There's simply no other reasonable explanation for the sad group of fruitcakes competing to be their nominee.  Obama has been selected by our corporate masters for another term in an effort to reduce the widening split between White and minority America.  He'll be the last non-White president for a very long time, perhaps the last one ever.  However, whenever the illusion of a happy multiracial society is questioned, Obama will be pointed to as proof that we live in a wonderful multiracial society where color and class don't matter.

Offline

 

#16 2012-01-23 06:25:00

Another way to look at it is that the Repubs think they can get more election cash if Obama stays in office. Besides, it's an old righty-tighty trick. What do you think Dole was doing? Trying to beat Bill Clinton?

Offline

 

#17 2012-02-05 16:37:47

This is what I wrote four years ago about the rigged election. Same thing repeats this year.

532. We need an honest, transparent election (Iowa Primary lesson 1) (1/13/08)

Obama wins Iowa - a state with 92% white population. Why a white state which generally considered conservative has elected a black candidate? It means American people are too resentful to the policy of current government. They hate Iraq war and the loss of civil right.

How can we have this result? Because Iowa Democratic Primary Caucus is an honest, transparent one. Residents gathered at the site on time to discuss their choices then raise their hands. The counting is present, direct and clear. Voters know the result right away. It makes an election hard to be rigged.

As we have seen the mainstream of public opinion is to change the status quo, then Ron Paul should have won the Iowa Republican Caucus too. He has more distinctive flag than Obama has. But he only got 10%. Why? He obviously lost to a corruptive vote system in Iowa Republican Primary - ballot counting.
The ballot was counted by election office. Then an officer would tell you the result. A number can be faked or altered easily. Voters can hardly verify it individually.

This is proved in New Hampshire Primary:

Quote, "Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H
By admin | January 8, 2008
Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn’t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=655#more-655

Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton
Moreover, when Sutton had been found out, they quickly added 31 votes, and cited ‘human error.’ What is their excuse for this source, now showing Greenville at 25 votes:
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbc … y=news0807

The problem is, you have to take what they told you but can't verify it. They could tell you it's zero, that forgery is easy to be find out. They could also tell you it's 31 (or 25) then it is hard for you to confirm it's a rigging while the real votes may be 131 or 125.

-----------------

This is a covert totalitarian country. They select president by rigged election. (They control the voting office by intelligence) and justify the result by fake poll. (They manipulate public opinion by media)

Offline

 

#18 2012-02-05 17:33:04

(They manipulate public opinion by media)

Offline

 

#19 2012-02-17 21:26:48

Why Santorum had a three continue victory in three states? He is benefitted by a leaking news. To deny the election is a planned game that Romney is a designated winner, the Republican organizer suddenly push Santorum to the leading position. For them, Santorum and Romney have no difference - a loyal puppet to the master. Do you know any difference between them? Here is the news they try to discount:

As many of us suspected. Its Romney

2012 US election result accidently leaked

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojmOESqV … r_embedded

Offline

 

#20 2012-03-01 20:34:40

This says it all
http://www.rense.com/1.imagesH/Honest%20Ron%20Paul.jpg

Last edited by katsung47 (2012-03-01 20:37:02)

Offline

 

#21 2012-03-18 20:48:51

http://i334.photobucket.com/albums/m411/trophyfish2/RPKCMO.jpg

Thousands Gather In Standing room only for Ron Paul in Kansas City Union Station February 18, 2012

Offline

 

#22 2012-03-18 21:36:38

HAS ANY CHANCE OF BEING ELECTED

YES NO YES NO MAYBE

Offline

 

#23 2012-03-18 21:36:50

Kathy, you need to keep it to yourself that you're a Ronulan.  You're a well-known Internet personality, and frankly your endorsement would damage Ron Paul's chances of winning the nomination.  Who am I kidding?  Ron Paul will never be the nominee even if he were to obtain overwhelming support from the Republican grass roots!  Endorse away Kathy!  It's not possible for you to damage his chances of obtaining the nomination!

Offline

 

#25 2012-03-19 22:33:18

Offline

 

#26 2012-03-20 15:09:25



Wait for the end when Ricky gives the standing O.

Offline

 

#27 2012-04-03 16:42:28

fnord wrote:

Kathy, you need to keep it to yourself that you're a Ronulan.  You're a well-known Internet personality, and frankly your endorsement would damage Ron Paul's chances of winning the nomination.  Who am I kidding?  Ron Paul will never be the nominee even if he were to obtain overwhelming support from the Republican grass roots!  Endorse away Kathy!  It's not possible for you to damage his chances of obtaining the nomination!

I know. But it's because this is a totalitarian country where election is rigged, controlled.

http://www.bartcop.com/paul-lens.jpg

Media camara

Offline

 

#28 2012-04-03 20:10:02

katsung47 wrote:

fnord wrote:

Kathy, you need to keep it to yourself that you're a Ronulan.  You're a well-known Internet personality, and frankly your endorsement would damage Ron Paul's chances of winning the nomination.  Who am I kidding?  Ron Paul will never be the nominee even if he were to obtain overwhelming support from the Republican grass roots!  Endorse away Kathy!  It's not possible for you to damage his chances of obtaining the nomination!

I know. But it's because this is a totalitarian country where election is rigged, controlled.

Well, actually no. Da Do RonRon is popular because what he says makes eminent sense, right up to a point. He'll never be President because beyond that point he's a batshit-crazy racist asshole who named his son after a second-rate porn writer.

Offline

 

#29 2012-04-16 15:23:04

GOP committee attempts to manipulate delegate
process in Missouri

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKe0dxBJy1A
6 min. video


GOP's Guide on How To Steal A Election
without Breaking A Sweat! - Georgia

http://tinyurl.com/7564yjw or
http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/v … o_id=18267
5 min. video

ELECTION Fraud? Why Did ABC-TV Post Illinois
GOP Primary "Vote Count" 24 Hours Early?

http://tinyurl.com/d35gv7v or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdGJaGbL … re=related
3 min. video

Pandemonium at MO GOP Caucus as Party Leaders
Seen Attempting to Steal It From Paul Supporters

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9192

'Republican Party Establishment Hates Democracy
(and Ron Paul Supporters)'
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9199
9 min. video

Ron Paul Supports got evidence of Election fraud
- Missouri and Georgia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJMiNg9l … re=related
9 min.

Programmer testifies under oath the ease of rigging an
election via software, that he was paid to create.
Lobbyists asks this man to create a program to rig
an election.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Xu3VSLsj2g

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IssuesAnd … sage/43140

Offline

 

#30 2012-04-29 19:27:30

http://www.politifake.org/image/political/1202/unelectable-vs-electable-ron-paul-2012-peace-prosperity-politics-1330439272.jpg

Offline

 

#31 2012-05-14 14:44:41

Where is media?

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23789746/53777_n.jpeg

Ron Paul is unelctable because the voting system is controlled by the Feds. They pick up their own puppet through rigged election and justify it by fake poll. (because they also control the media.) Only one thing they couldn't control - they couldn't rigged the attendence of the campaign meeting. That's how you see in these pictures. Of course, media never report it. You only see it in Internet.

Offline

 

#32 2012-05-29 16:11:45

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/img/hq4f5e571c.jpg


Ron Paul is unelctable because the voting system is controlled by the Feds. They pick up their own puppet through rigged election and justify it by fake poll. (because they also control the media.) Only one thing they couldn't control - they couldn't rigged the attendence of the campaign meeting. That's how you see in these pictures. Of course, media never report it. You only see it in Internet.

Offline

 

#33 2012-06-11 21:01:49

Lawyers for Ron Paul - GOP fraud
./viewtopic.php?p=1716270by free_life2 » 06/ 07/

Your Help Is Needed – We MUST ACT QUICKLY
Are you FED UP with the fraud of the GOP in this election??…Become informed of a LAWSUIT BEING FILED soon in federal court - CIVIL RIGHTS AND VOTER FRAUD VIOLATIONS.

A group of attorneys have come together –“LAWYERS FOR RON PAUL” (https://www.facebook.com/groups/188334154612254/) and will be on a huge conference call on Wednesday 06/06/2012 @ 7:00 pm (PST) / 10:00 pm (EST), to explain this “Heart-Pounding” event.

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/v … 8&t=155576

Offline

 

#34 2012-06-26 21:25:19

Fraud confirmed in Texas. Election judge says votes were switched.
Submitted by Dr.K.Research on Mon, 06/11/2012 - 13:29
in Daily Paul Liberty Forum


Could Ron Paul have gotten 72% of the vote instead of 12%? Anne Beckett, election judge for Austin (Travis County), says it is so.

In fact, she did an entrance poll of Republican voters for their party preference and says that a minimum of 66% offered on their own that they came to vote for Ron Paul. As she polled them she wrote a line on her hand, then, counted the total voters. A minimum of 66% and as high as 72% of all the votes went for Paul, NOT Romney (she wishes to be conservative, but says that at the bare minimum 66%, not 12%, of the votes went to Paul).

For credibility it is important to note that she took a complete poll and was there from 6:00 a.m. until closing (12 hours). The precinct she judged was 247-R.

http://www.dailypaul.com/239494/fraud-c … rkrbn-live

Last edited by katsung47 (2012-06-26 21:26:47)

Offline

 

#35 2012-07-11 15:09:18

Hundreds of thousands of Ron Paul supporters voted for Romney today
Submitted by Dr.K.Research on Tue, 05/08/2012 - 19:00
in
•    Daily Paul Liberty Forum

Hundreds of enthusiastic DP’ers have posted proudly, “I voted for Ron Paul today.” However, in many cases that's not even true. Instead, those dedicated freedom fighters may have just cast their votes for their arch-enemy, globalist and Goldman Sachs candidate Mitt Romney. Even more bizarre, those votes may well have went to Santorum and even Gingrich, too. How else could anyone explain those numbers.

When Michelle Bachmann dropped out of the race, how did she do in her own home state? She got less than .5% of ther vote. Santorum with 12% in West Virginia, defeating the actively campaigning Paul? That is impossible.
Like the ones prior in these May 8th primaries countless thousands of our votes were stolen and handed over to Romney. That’s right, Romney gets the CREDIT for our votes, falsely gloating in it. If that doesn’t make your blood boil, what will?

This has been happening since Iowa. The same happened in tonight’s primaries. Yet, incredibly, it also happened years ago in West Virginia, Indiana, and North Carolina, in that case for John McCain.

In 2008 we were cheated out of tens of thousands of votes in these states. For instance, in West Virginia McCain had minimal popularity and was, rather, greatly disliked. Yet, he 'won' in a landslide. It was all rigged. Are we going to let it happen again?

We talk about "unbinding" delegates. How about unbinding our votes from Romney and even Santorum and putting them where they belong, back to Ron Paul?

It’s easy to do. Just go to RonPaulVoteCount.org and get your affidavit. When done, either upload it or mail it, or even fax it. They are being uploaded and mailed in from all over the country. Join us to prove, once and for all, our real vote count.

UPDATE: This started from the beginning. In Iowa Edward L. True caught the error, filed an affidavit, and made the riggers change it. In a neighboring county, Appanoose-Union, a township with only 100 potential voters, Santorum was give 32 caucus votes. The GOP was called on it by Iowa activists. They changed it to 3 votes. Matt McDonald caught Maine GOP fudging numbers, stealing votes from Dr. Paul, and forced them to change it. And we're supposed to be the paranoid ones? If we ARE suspicious, we have been given all the reason to be.
You want more proof of the rigging? Go here:

http://www.meetup.com/Harrisburg-Libert … tos/355... (West Virginia)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Q9NSVUu8nk (West Virginia)

Last edited by katsung47 (2012-07-11 15:11:10)

Offline

 

#36 2012-07-24 17:50:37

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_luecnd9Qay1r0f1jho1_500.jpg

The elosion of free choice

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com