phreddy wrote:

bad tatoo tread

In retribution for the recurrent solecism, especially the instance in the Topic Title, I'm hijacking this thread with some old-style porn gifs.

Tall Paul wrote:

WCL wrote:

In retribution for the recurrent solecism, especially the instance in the Topic Title, I'm hijacking this thread with some old-style porn gifs.

We have a thread for that now, shouldn't be too hard to find with brainpower like yours.

Look at that ugly furniture!

Bigcat wrote:

Nice, WCL Punishes by GIF. Thank you sir, may I have another?

Why of course, Bigcat - hope you like pearls!

And here's a bonus-pic of Small Pall receiving fellatio from his sister:

And here's a silly one for Matty-the-Darned, who appears to have a mental age of about 12.


Edit: turned the embedded woman/dog image into a link instead - square
Edit: removed woman/dog image entirely - WCL

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

Last edited by WCL (2012-05-02 07:14:45)

Emmeran wrote:

Somebody kill the bestiality please.

The love between woman and dog is a beautiful thing, as long as the woman is hot, and the dog is hung. (The gif I posted fails on at least one of those counts - maybe someone has something better?)

Thank you, square. This discussion has surfaced many times but not for a long while and it's easy to forget simple solutions.

For me, text is sacred but I suppose there are exceptions... like eastern equine encephalitis. Images? Meh.

Still, I hate playing grownup censuring crimes I may someday want to commit.

For the record, Taint blooded the bored first but some wretched swine appears to have spiked that post.

choad wrote:

Thank you, square. This discussion has surfaced many times but not for a long while and it's easy to forget simple solutions.

For me, text is sacred but I suppose there are exceptions... like eastern equine encephalitis. Images? Meh.

Still, I hate playing grownup censuring crimes I may someday want to commit.

For the record, Taint blooded the bored first but some wretched swine appears to have spiked that post.

So good natured am I, I will erase that link entirely and post something else that's equally as illustrative of the underlying point without causing a grand Puritan outcry. Because that's what this is, even if (especially if) legalities are cited. It is a good discussion, though, given that "Crimes Against Nature" are committed by what some researchers reckon to be a majority of us, and which are certainly part of the human mosaic (don't worry it's a text link). So ancient a practice is bestiality that I have posted below a 5,000-year-old rock painting of a man buggering a moose (some say copulating and donkey, but I say buggering and moose).

I hope that's okay.
And what about (the following pics are all taken from a great wiki) Hokusai Katsushika's (葛飾北斎) (1760–1849) The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife? Is it okay if I post that?

What about these thousand-year-old carvings - do they cross a line? They're pretty damned explicit.

Jumping ahead a little, here's one of my favourites - it's a Franz von Bayros:

It must be l'apres-midi d'un faune!
A little darker in tone, it turns out that medieval Christians often factored bestiality into the Blood Libel. 

Imagine that - Christians using sexuality as a means of social control...against Jews...against sodomites...against adulterers...against witches.... Who'd a thunk? I wonder if those attitudes persist today?
Certainly they did in the 19th-Century, when gentlemen generally known for their stuffiness and sexual repression, seemed to dwell upon certain customs of the ancient Greeks rather more than one might expect:

Plate XVII from 'De Figuris Veneris' by F.K. Forberg, illustrated by Édouard-Henri Avril.
In fact, I think a lot of Christians spent a lot of time thinking about saucy Greeks.

Oh Swanee, how I love ya! How I love ya!
And by the way...even the redoubtable Iranians weren't historically immune to the charms of Puppy Love:

Fancy that - the Quran has nothing at all to say on the subject. It condemns so many things, but fucking animals? Nope. Not a word. We can assume that Muhammad buggered goats.

Jihadists - this is not a depiction of Muhammad. It is a depiction of Muhammad Jr. one of his lesser-known sons.
Oddly enough, many of the laws against bestiality do not distinguish between animal fucking and sodomy. It's all disgusting, right? Any man who would fuck another man would fuck an animal, or even a child. Right? Right.

Perhaps it would be good to remind ourselves now and then that we ARE, in fact, animals. When we fuck each other, we commit an act of bestiality.

Doggy-style? Woof woof!
And if we're willing to commit bestiality with each other, perhaps we're all faggots and pedophiles, as well. The Puritans are right - we need to watch each other closely. Cold showers, early to bed, keep our hands above the counterpane and never post the wrong sorts of dirty pictures. Only through the vigilance and intolerance of Puritans can God's Will be done, and only by adhering to the dictates of the religious peasant class - the Baptist and the Methodist, the Evangelical and the Charismatic - these human puke-stains, these bitter, self-important morons, only by upholding their hypocritical values may we ourselves avoid the penis-shaped pitchforks of Hell. Simper fidelis - I'm going to bed to play with my poodle.

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

choad wrote:

crimes I may someday want to commit.

.

Is this meant to imply that you wish to chug dog cock?

Oh shit. Wilbur's channeling Horse.

WCL wrote:

Emmeran wrote:

woof woof woof...FBI bait...woof woof woof shill woof

This is what happens when Puritans feel threatened. They get mad and lay down the law - end of discourse. Why? Because they're simple-minded. Because they've been trained that the safest way to argue is to shut down discourse. And don't forget, because what you're saying is getting their little dicks hot, and that makes them very uncomfortable. It also gives them bad dreams, like the one below, of Auntie Em turning into two bears and fucking himself up the ass.

To give you due prop's your first retort was interesting, now you're just boring; for a bit there I almost believed that you weren't a sock puppet.

But what the hell, we're all wrong from time to time - nothing to get upset about.  Yes I do understand that you can flout conventional consideration and make nasty jokes, but I'm very bored with that now that I've had a couple of boys pass through middle school.  Post what you will but turning the entire message board into a NSFW zone will only drive away contributing members.

Face it - you can't shock us, we've all seen too much; so once again, please mind the social guidelines, they might suck occasionally but then again so do you. Then again if you are driven by some childhood deprivation or trauma to Troll for self satisfaction then please at least learn how to do it.

Last edited by Emmeran (2012-05-02 16:27:00)

Pommeranian wrote:

woof woof arf FBI-shill woof arf woof

Sorry, little fella, but I can't see anything in the backroom rule discussions about bestiality. CP is clearly verboten, copyright should be respected. That's all I see, except for a fat old bald guy whose weltanschauung is clearly threatened, and who is still trying to shape the Internet in his sad little Puritan image. Sure, I hijacked this thread and filled it with NSFW - that's going to happen now and then, and not just by me. As for the animal/human love, I'll keep it to the NSFW threads - but that's all I'll promise unless I see a definitive statement from the site owner. Which I don't. Anywhere. So bite my fat cock, baldy, and chug down a quart of my warm salty word-cum (which would in itself constitute a form of bestiality, since you're clearly a whiny bitch).


"Mmmm...tastes like Aunt Em's Corn-Fed Asshole!"

(Having said his fill on this subject, WCL disengages from the thread, gracefully pirouetting into the distance, ignoring the gnashing of little doggy teeth behind him.)

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

WCL wrote:

As for the animal/human love.. ...that's all I'll promise unless I see a definitive statement from...  …my cock...  ....which would in itself constitute a form of bestiality
(Hoping to have the last word on this subject, WCL disengages from the goat, gracefully prancing into the distance

Oh wait!!!! So we can misconstrue others posts to garner attention!!

Back off twit, I didn't object to the content merely the placement.

It's a point though, title edited.  It's not considered Canadian to porn bomb a innocent thread. 

Also, channeling Horse is generally not well accepted here.  I'm probably still reviled for encouraging that particular participant.

Y'all are still at it?

Pommeran wrote:

Secondly I'll explain the final reference to you as clearly and concisely as possible:  Isn't it about time for you to Go Fuck Yourself?

                                                 Pomeran's Fabulous Singing Debut!

Decadence wrote:

WCL wrote:

Sorry, little fella, but I can't see anything in the backroom rule discussions about bestiality. CP is clearly verboten, copyright should be respected. That's all I see, except for a fat old bald guy whose weltanschauung is clearly threatened, and who is still trying to shape the Internet in his sad little Puritan image.

I do re-call that we briefly discussed bestiality some time back.  If my memory serves me well (Which is rather questionable these days), our server is in Deutschland where bestiality is perfectly legal.

The elegant voice of reason. Glad you're still breathing Dec. Don't stop.

Tall Paul wrote:

Hooking is perfectly legal in Columbia, and look what that defense got the Secret Service.

We are discussing a legal issue - Not a moral one.  Those agents were fired for the perception of having embarrassed the organization.  If you are implying that High-Street should be held to the same moral standards as a Federal agency, your head is going to explode should you ever wander in-to the picture thread.

Taint wrote:

http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/8586/grouphugs.jpg

Hey Taint - you pulled a 403 Forbidden. I hope I'm wrong, but I have a feeling that this is what you were going for:


(Cue porno music - boom shacka-lacka schwing! Christopher Robin enters from stage right and jams his small cock up Piglet's submissive ass. Emmeran enters, stage left, looking angry, followed by a crew of FBI agents swinging nightsticks. In the ensuing struggle a female FBI agent's top pops open and her huge pink breasts roll out like two self-inflating breast-shaped life-rafts - boom shacka-lacka double-schwing! The agents stop beating on the animals and start beating their burgeoning FBI-boners instead. An orgy ensues - flesh slides through stuffing, stuffing grows soggy with sperm. Everybody gets thoroughly plowed (except Emmeran, who watches from the sidelines, glowering and muttering about civic responsiblity and the American Way). Afterwards, as the shame sets in, the FBI agents look for a scapegoat - and find one. Singing "Ho! For the life of a bear!" they tie a rope around Winnie's neck and hang him from a pine tree. As he writhes and breathes his last they take turns riding his corpse-boner, milking the dying ursine's cock for every last ounce of honey. It's a flurry of furry bestial snuff sex - brought to you by High-Street!)

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

Last edited by WCL (2012-05-04 18:36:14)

Decadence wrote:

If my memory serves me well (Which is rather questionable these days), our server is in Deutschland where bestiality is perfectly legal.

New Jersey, actually.  It may look like humans are mating with animals there, but they're really other humans.

Tall Paul wrote:

Decadence wrote:

Tall Paul wrote:

Hooking is perfectly legal in Columbia, and look what that defense got the Secret Service.

We are discussing a legal issue - Not a moral one.  Those agents were fired for the perception of having embarrassed the organization.  If you are implying that High-Street should be held to the same moral standards as a Federal agency, your head is going to explode should you ever wander in-to the picture thread.

What I'm saying is that the country the host server is in will make little difference should the Govamint decide to screw with you. Also, if I had easily offended moral standards I wouldn't be a regular here, now would I?

Ever notice how you are largely ignored except for the occasional someone special letting you know how fucking stupid and dull you are?