#1 2012-10-05 13:18:21
New guy I'm sorta seeing sends me a text and it just says:
Good morning beautiful. Show me your tits.
KEEPER?? Yes/Yes?
I know this isn't cruel, but I can't think of a more appropriate place to post "show me your tits".
At least he hasn't said "pull my finger" yet.
WHAT'S SHAKING LOSERS????? SHOW ME YOUR TITS!
Offline
#2 2012-10-05 13:36:24
Well, he's right but we have first dibbs.
Show us your tits!
Offline
#3 2012-10-05 13:37:20
Keep him - Tits for you
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#4 2012-10-05 13:41:50
Thanks Em! Couldn't have said it better myself...
Offline
#5 2012-10-05 15:24:06
We need to see these tits to decide on this guy's motives. If they are indeed nice tits, we should evaluate them; it's possible he's just trying to have intercourse with you. If they're horrifying, he might be trolling you. In the latter case, pictures won't be necessary. If you don't post pictures, we'll just know they're awful.
Offline
#6 2012-10-05 15:29:29
Do you suppose he knows about your long history with us, and is cluing you in that the two of you might have a lot in common?
Offline
#7 2012-10-05 15:42:20
Plus, we need to know if he's already SEEN your tits. If you've titillated him, then I would say he is within his rights to demand a second performance.
The caveat, of course, is we get first dibs.
Show us your tits.
Offline
#8 2012-10-05 15:49:48
LOL I love you all...big perverted group grope!
No, he hasn't seen them yet, so he's not getting a photo. And neither are you all.
I think my boobs are outstanding. If he's lucky he may get to find out himself.
Offline
#9 2012-10-05 16:14:44
Roger_That wrote:
And neither are you all.
Per our agreement in my earlier post, you are thereby conceding that your tits are wretched, misshapen, acne-scarred boner killers.
There is only one way to clear this up. Until then, we are forced to conclude that your tits are the chesticular equivalent of Roger Ebert's face. Is that really what you want?
Offline
#10 2012-10-05 16:44:11
Not going to work, AH. It's all been tried here before.
Offline
#11 2012-10-05 17:25:15
Is he hung?
Offline
#12 2012-10-05 17:31:22
Taint wrote:
Is he hung?
He will be if he hurts our little Roger. 
Offline
#13 2012-10-05 17:32:29
Are you sure he's not one of us, in the final days of a three-year plan to violate your puckerstar? Imagine the hilarity as he deftly jams his 9" chocolate-monster up your point-of-sale brownie dispenser and says: "Don't struggle, Woggah - just lie back and think about High-Street."
Offline
#14 2012-10-05 17:32:45
Roger_That wrote:
Not going to work, AH. It's all been tried here before.
How about just one tit? Think of it as a half-price deal.
Offline
#15 2012-10-05 19:18:53
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
Are you sure he's not one of us, in the final days of a three-year plan to violate your puckerstar? Imagine the hilarity as he deftly jams his 9" chocolate-monster up your point-of-sale brownie dispenser and says: "Don't struggle, Woggah - just lie back and think about High-Street."
In which case we'll have more than just pics..... I'm looking forward to the 1080p.
Offline
#16 2012-10-08 13:15:30
God you people are so wrong you're right.
He's not from HS alas. He doesn't do internets much if at all. Main form of communication is good old fashioned telephone or modern day texting.
And Taint, I don't know if he's hung. I haven't copped a feel. I'll be taking advantage the next time I see him though. I like the try before you buy option.
Offline
