#1 2007-12-09 15:07:15

Employing domestic help or having a nursing assistant provide personal care to a loved one can cause a significant change in quality of life for those whom these employees come in contact with.

Offline

 

#2 2007-12-09 15:59:32

You know you could find just as many stories about white people doing the same thing.  I had an elderly great uncle (93 at the time) who had a woman from the neighborhood who would come tidy up his house (she was in her 40s).  Well, she also started letting him rub on her ass while she was over there and the next thing you know he signed over his house to her.  We eventually had him made a ward of the state and the state went after her.

She was Polish, by the way, and told us family members that she deserved the house because she was his girlfriend.

Offline

 

#3 2007-12-09 16:22:42

headkicker_girl wrote:

We eventually had him made a ward of the state and the state went after her.

From time to time, I still see the Irish scumbag care giver who 'looked after' my grandfather and later, my favorite great aunt. He lives only a mile away and still preys on rich old fucks, last I heard. Part of me no longer cares and another part thanks you for reminding me again to mention this to my local cop friends.

Offline

 

#4 2007-12-09 21:18:18

Fnord, at what point does your argument that people of different races would be better off living apart from one another - an argument with which I disagree but for argument's sake I'll accept at face value - begin to meld into simple racism?

Offline

 

#5 2007-12-09 21:52:13

Fnord, I don't get it. I've spent, what, four years waiting for you to drop the provocateur pretense and confess you're just having fun at our expense.

You and I hail from the same place, probably roughly the same age, attended the same segregated schools, and were both exposed to the same Florida apartheid. Remember that, don't you? Entire towns divided by walls separating white from black?

I know you're not dumb enough to think blacks are your intellectual inferiors because you've freely associated with them right here for years.

Drop the veil or describe the formative nightmare you endured that made your mind snap.

Offline

 

#6 2007-12-09 23:31:45

Well, I gotta say... my dad was from the deep south and was as much of a hard-liner Southerner as you could imagine... he passed away in late 2005, but in the month's that preceeded his death we had hired a full-duty nurse for him - a local black woman - and after a time he began to refer to her as his 'girlfriend'... she was so sweet to him, and so caring, and he really did adore her... and when he died, as was expected, she was shattered. 

Humanity trumps color every time.

Offline

 

#7 2007-12-10 03:36:15

Yes, Polish or Irish caretakers can take advantage of their clients, as you have discovered.  However, brutally beating their victims to death or repeatedly raping a cripple is something a White is far less likely to do.  Several times during my stays in Europe, I experienced unsuccessful attempts to pick my pockets; I also encountered ripoffs of one sort or another, but I realized a European criminal was not likely to send me to the hospital as part of stealing from or ripping me off. 

Blacks (and those with significant Black admixture such as Mexicans) are far more violent than Whites and far more likely to take advantage of those they see as weak or helpless.  Whites are more likely to offer charity to those who have suffered misfortune, or shrug their shoulders and try not to see them.  Blacks are likely to see the unfortunate and the unwary as prey.

Blacks have very different instincts from Whites; this is part of the tragedy of the mulatto, experiencing the competing savage bloodlust of the African beast and the noble instincts of their Caucasian ancestors.  Most mulattos who try to accomplish anything in life must constantly fight violent animal instincts that the overwhelming majority of Whites do not possess; often everything is lost when the mulatto fails to suppress these impulses and experiences a “chimp out” episode.

There was no great formative nightmare.  Studies have shown that small children do not like people of other races and I was no exception.  There was the Black man who attempted to rape my mother in a parking lot, the race riots in my town where Whites were dragged out of their cars and beaten; in other words, the usual things that happened to people around me.  I eventually came to believe it was oppression, racism, and the legacy of slavery that made Blacks what they are.  I often felt a sense of unease around blacks, but ascribed it to residual racism that had its origin in contamination picked up from living in a racist society.

It was my time in Europe that was the real eye opener.  In all White towns, violent crime is extremely rare.  The police usually do not carry firearms.  There was very little graffiti and the atmosphere was relaxed.  The streets were full of people at night, socializing with their neighbors, walking to and from pubs and restaurants, shopping, trying to get laid, or enjoying concerts.  They didn’t barricade themselves behind locked doors after dark the way most White Americans do.  What crime there was tended to be of the petty theft or scam variety.  The local “bad kids” were actually quaint and oddly charming; these were the teenagers who smoked cigarettes and fucked at an early age.  This is when I realized the damage that is done to us by forced association with people who hate us and see us as the enemy.  Blacks and others detest Whites; they destroy the things we build, attack and rape whites on a regular basis and denigrate our culture.  Why not do them and us a favor and allow them to lead their lives without having to interact with us?

Last edited by fnord (2007-12-10 03:58:53)

Offline

 

#8 2007-12-10 03:57:13

fnord wrote:

Yes, Polish or Irish caretakers can take advantage of their clients, as you have discovered.  However, brutally beating their victims to death or repeatedly raping a cripple is something a White is far less likely to do.  Several times during my stays in Europe, I experienced unsuccessful attempts to pick my pockets; I also encountered ripoffs of one sort or another, but I realized a European criminal was not likely to send me to the hospital as part of stealing from or ripping me off.

You know that saying it doesn't make it true, right?  Your logic is sloppy and you have absolutely no reason to believe what you believe.  Did you get burned by the Aunt Jemima while making waffles as a kid or something?

fnord wrote:

Blacks (and those with significant black admixture such as Mexicans) are far more violent than Whites and far more likely to take advantage of those they see as weak or helpless.  Whites are more likely to offer charity to those who have suffered misfortune, or shrug their shoulders and try not to see them.  Blacks are likely to see the unfortunate and the unwary as prey.

Again, you just keep saying these things as if you had any reason at all to believe them, but you never do give anything to back it up.  You're obviously not stupid, but your willful ignorance is far more repugnant. 

fnord wrote:

Blacks have very different instincts from whites; this is part of the tragedy of the mulatto, experiencing the competing savage bloodlust of the African beast and the noble instincts of their Caucasian ancestors.  Most mulattos who try to accomplish anything in life must constantly fight violent animal instincts that the overwhelming majority of whites do not possess; often everything is lost when the mulatto fails to suppress these impulses and experiences a “chimp out” episode.

You would be a lot more convincing if you actually knowingly conversed with any mixed-race people.  The idea that you know what goes on in their minds is laughable.

fnord wrote:

It was my time in Europe that was the real eye opener.  In all white towns, violent crime is extremely rare.

Now you finally come to it, and I take it back.  You are a simpleton if you really believe that your time in Europe has given you a revelation about the effect of race-mixing on violence in the US.  Either that, or you are so immensely smart and talented that you really should quit your day job and start writing books.  I'm sure you'd be doing the world of psychology, biology, and sociology a huge favor.  You can guess which one I'll put my money on.

Offline

 

#9 2007-12-10 07:59:31

Fnord -- in all white towns violent crimes are simply under reported in many instances because it's a closed culture and people don't like interference from outsiders.  When I was in Minnesota, I had a friend who was a prosecutor in the sex crimes units.  Her entire job consisted of trying to recommit sexual offenders who were at high risk for reoffending.  The majority of these offenders were white males living in small towns in Minnesota who had molested children for years.  Everyone in the towns knew who they were, but did nothing to stop them.  Also, if you look at other closed societies like the Amish, rape is rampant.  The same with the Mormons.  Is rape not a violent crime?

I can bet you there was plenty of crime in the small towns in Europe that you visited.  However, you as an outsider would never be privy to that information. 

In addition, you totally ignore the effect that meth has had on white culture.  Just like how crack caused the escalation of crimes in all black neighborhoods, meth is destroying white communities.

Now we could get into the actual real numbers of blacks accused and convicted of crimes versus whites, but we'd also have to get into plea agreements and selective prosecution as well as access to competent legal  representation.  Illinois had numerous black men on death row who were exonerated based on DNA evidence.  To accept crime statistics as accurate is to say that the system is just.  It's not.

You also ignore the history of violence against blacks by whites.  Lynchings were common place.  In your home state of Florida white mob burned down a black town for no other reason than the fact that the blacks were uppity...the same in Tulsa, OK.  Whites HAVE historically gone out of their way to keep blacks from achieving...400 years of oppession versus maybe 50 years or so for the Irish and other whites who were able to overcome their ethnicity based on skin color.

And if you look at recent violence, it's not black males who are arming themselves up and going to malls, schools and other public places and killing scores of innocent people.  Now the racist black person would look at that situation and say that all white males are violent.

I also have to add, Fnord, that I found your explanation disappointing.  It sounds like the same drivel written on white supremecist sites.  I'd thought you were more intelligent than that.

Last edited by headkicker_girl (2007-12-10 09:25:17)

Offline

 

#10 2007-12-10 09:47:31

fnord wrote:

Blacks have very different instincts from Whites; this is part of the tragedy of the mulatto, experiencing the competing savage bloodlust of the African beast and the noble instincts of their Caucasian ancestors.  Most mulattos who try to accomplish anything in life must constantly fight violent animal instincts that the overwhelming majority of Whites do not possess; often everything is lost when the mulatto fails to suppress these impulses and experiences a “chimp out” episode.

HAHAHAHHAHAAH.  Oh that's rich.  Noble Caucasians.  Hey, read about some of those nasty European pre-gunpowder wars and still try to claim that whitey is inherently noble.  Start with the Battle of Crecy, where the British soldiers kept their swords in their privies when not in use so they'd make festering wounds on the French.

fnord wrote:

Studies have shown that small children do not like people of other races and I was no exception.

That's an animal instinct, there, G.

fnord wrote:

There was the Black man who attempted to rape my mother in a parking lot,

Oh, shit, that was yo' moms?  Damn, dog, I don' like to do that shit in fronta a bitch's shorties.  I musta been fucked up on sumpin.  My bad, nigga.

Last edited by jesusluvspegging (2007-12-10 10:35:02)

Offline

 

#11 2007-12-10 10:21:53

fnord wrote:

violent animal instincts that the overwhelming majority of Whites do not possess

You have never been in combat, fnord; that is obvious with this completely false statement.


http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/9400/caediteeosnovitenimdomimm8.jpg




Bonus historical reference.  [Second entry.]

Last edited by MSG Tripps (2007-12-10 10:24:27)

Offline

 

#12 2007-12-10 10:39:37

MSG Tripps wrote:

fnord wrote:

violent animal instincts that the overwhelming majority of Whites do not possess

You have never been in combat, fnord; that is obvious with this completely false statement.
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/9400 … omimm8.jpg
Bonus historical reference.  [Second entry.]

Sidetrack: I've noticed a lot of Vets get into reading about history when they get out of the service.  Is this fairly widespread or is it just the (admittedly small) sample I'm exposed to?  If this tendency is widespread, when does the individual get interested in studying history, before or after their military experience?

Offline

 

#13 2007-12-10 11:14:47

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Sidetrack: I've noticed a lot of Vets get into reading about history when they get out of the service.  Is this fairly widespread or is it just the (admittedly small) sample I'm exposed to?  If this tendency is widespread, when does the individual get interested in studying history, before or after their military experience?

????    What ever floats your boat.....    ????

Offline

 

#14 2007-12-10 11:34:57

MSG Tripps wrote:

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Sidetrack: I've noticed a lot of Vets get into reading about history when they get out of the service.  Is this fairly widespread or is it just the (admittedly small) sample I'm exposed to?  If this tendency is widespread, when does the individual get interested in studying history, before or after their military experience?

????    What ever floats your boat.....    ????

Sampling error it is, then.

Offline

 

#15 2007-12-10 13:08:59

sic

Found Fnord's mug shot over on Smoking Gun...

http://i18.tinypic.com/6pgcn0g.jpg

Offline

 

#16 2007-12-10 13:19:03

What do you think he does for a living? Dishwasher or poultry processor?

Offline

 

#17 2007-12-10 13:30:04

sic

Taint wrote:

What do you think he does for a living? Dishwasher or poultry processor?

Neck-hole tester.

Offline

 

#18 2007-12-10 13:33:31

Taint wrote:

What do you think he does for a living? Dishwasher or poultry processor?

Meth cooker, of course.

You can see his carelessness in the "lab" has burned his eyebrows clean off.

Offline

 

#19 2007-12-10 13:45:56

sic wrote:

Found Fnord's mug shot over on Smoking Gun...

http://i18.tinypic.com/6pgcn0g.jpg

This picture has totally been photoshopped.  You can see down under his chin where they erased the neck bolts.

Offline

 

#20 2007-12-10 14:00:01

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Sidetrack: I've noticed a lot of Vets get into reading about history when they get out of the service.  Is this fairly widespread or is it just the (admittedly small) sample I'm exposed to?  If this tendency is widespread, when does the individual get interested in studying history, before or after their military experience?

It has been my experience that people in the army are generally predisposed to studying history, if they are predisposed to studying anything at all. A lot of history geeks in the active duty military, in fact I think being a history geek is sometimes a reason to join the military.

Offline

 

#21 2007-12-10 14:00:31

I'm feeling sorta instigationist:

Offline

 

#22 2007-12-10 14:19:26

and some more:

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com