#1 2014-05-13 05:23:49
Meet Steven Irwin, artistic defacer:
¥click gently but firmly¥
Offline
#2 2014-05-13 22:11:25
"Art"...
Offline
#3 2014-05-13 23:14:25
You CAN'T Fap To That
I took that as a challenge, but coming from a man that can fap to google earth, you're right.
Offline
#4 2014-05-13 23:17:48
Well, that was pretty much the idea. It's more of a brain-fap situation.
Offline
#5 2014-05-14 00:11:08
Seemed to be a bit too much Fnord style in those examples for my taste
**Edit: Half-buzzed typing skills prove annoying yet again.
Last edited by Emmeran (2014-05-14 00:12:19)
Offline
#6 2014-05-14 11:17:10
What about the issue of fucking with another artist's work? Would the art world approve and call me an artist if I airbrushed out the breasts and genitalia on display in many famous works?
Offline
#7 2014-05-14 11:53:44
phreddy wrote:
What about the issue of fucking with another artist's work? Would the art world approve and call me an artist if I airbrushed out the breasts and genitalia on display in many famous works?
Pretty sure the right-wing religious fanatics in this country have already beaten you to that: Parody Example of This
I also can't help but think of the Vatican, and the room that supposedly houses all the penises the HRE/RCC priests chipped off the statues back in the Dark Ages.
Offline
#8 2014-05-14 12:14:58
Baywolfe wrote:
I also can't help but think of the Vatican, and the room that supposedly houses all the penises the HRE/RCC priests chipped off the statues back in the Dark Ages.
Precisely. And we call these people defacers, not transformers, of art.
Offline
#9 2014-05-14 15:03:16
phreddy wrote:
What about the issue of fucking with another artist's work?
The courts, or a court ruling anyway, consider it art
Would the art world approve and call me an artist if I airbrushed out the breasts and genitalia on display in many famous works?
Of course not. That would be vandalism. If you did so with your own copies, who knows.
Offline
#10 2014-05-14 15:10:19
nfidelbastard wrote:
The courts, or a court ruling anyway, consider it art
Unless you did it to some perpetually copyrighted image, such as Mickey Mouse. Then you're at the mercy of whether the Mouse wants to sue you or not, fair use be damned.
Offline
