#1 2014-09-22 16:28:29
~ click ~
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2 2014-09-22 21:55:49
I'm no moonlanding hoaxer, but I know a few things about raytracing, ever since I had to buy the special floating point chip to be able to do it on my 80286, but all they really "proved" in that exercise is that the surface is as reflective as their model says it is and that someone who was slightly reflective was there holding the camera.
It's very hard to prove a contradiction to a spurious claim. I just want to know how the fakers managed to trick 20,000 NASA employees during the moonlanding.
Offline
#3 2014-09-22 22:14:10
GooberMcNutly wrote:
It's very hard to prove a contradiction to a spurious claim. I just want to know how the fakers managed to trick 20,000 NASA employees during the moon landing.
Not to mention Grumman, Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, and IBM employees.
Offline
#4 2014-09-22 22:42:11
Baywolfe wrote:
GooberMcNutly wrote:
It's very hard to prove a contradiction to a spurious claim. I just want to know how the fakers managed to trick 20,000 NASA employees during the moon landing.
Not to mention Grumman, Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, and IBM employees.
...and to explain how recent satellite and probe photos show human footprints on the moon's surface. Oh, and a few US flags.
Offline
#5 2014-09-23 02:22:27
Don't forget this one, choad.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#6 2014-09-23 05:39:16
whosasailorthen wrote:
Baywolfe wrote:
GooberMcNutly wrote:
It's very hard to prove a contradiction to a spurious claim. I just want to know how the fakers managed to trick 20,000 NASA employees during the moon landing.
Not to mention Grumman, Boeing, North American Aviation, Douglas Aircraft Company, and IBM employees.
...and to explain how recent satellite and probe photos show human footprints on the moon's surface. Oh, and a few US flags.
Photoshop.
Offline
#7 2014-09-23 06:37:51
GooberMcNutly wrote:
I'm no moonlanding hoaxer, but I know a few things about raytracing, ever since I had to buy the special floating point chip to be able to do it on my 80286, but all they really "proved" in that exercise is that the surface is as reflective as their model says it is and that someone who was slightly reflective was there holding the camera.
It's very hard to prove a contradiction to a spurious claim. I just want to know how the fakers managed to trick 20,000 NASA employees during the moonlanding.
You should have bought an Amiga
Offline
#8 2014-09-23 08:09:12
Offline
#10 2014-09-23 13:06:34
lechero wrote:
This guy didn't need a fancy new GPU to explain it well:
Most excellent.
Offline
#11 2014-09-23 20:57:18
whosasailorthen wrote:
lechero wrote:
This guy didn't need a fancy new GPU to explain it well:
Most excellent.
I liked his comment about how we can fake anything now, but can't seem to find the moon.
Offline
