#451 2016-09-14 10:31:14
#452 2016-09-14 11:47:44
This was in the bottom right corner of the Trump picture.
Sorry I couldn't enhance but it says:
ROB BESCHIZZA
With apologies to
Glen Eytchison
and ILM
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#453 2016-09-14 13:05:46
GooberMcNutly wrote:
I know I had seen this before...
You're right, of course, but I wouldn't confess to watching that except under duress, maybe.
Offline
#454 2016-09-14 15:26:16
choad wrote:
GooberMcNutly wrote:
I know I had seen this before...
You're right, of course, but I wouldn't confess to watching that except under duress, maybe.
Not our fault. How could we know it would suck so badly? My takeaway was that black and yellow dress outfit that Annie Potts wore.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#455 2016-09-25 00:05:55
Offline
#456 2016-09-25 00:37:14
choad wrote:
I'm OK with the dirty pictures.... but that's just obscene.
FNORD!
Offline
#457 2016-09-25 09:02:53
#458 2016-09-29 12:40:45
#459 2016-09-29 12:48:38
#460 2016-09-29 13:41:21
But...but...HARAMBE!
Shouldn't have been arrested, should have had his ass beat.
Offline
#461 2016-10-01 02:28:34
Offline
#462 2016-10-02 10:41:17
This story is equal parts hilarious and sad:
And so when she was released from the [mental] hospital with instructions to “maintain a healthy lifestyle,” she did what seemed to her not only healthy but also patriotic. She began campaigning for Trump.
“Finally,” she said. “Someone who thinks like me.”
Offline
#463 2016-10-02 16:07:05
It's not that we did that, it's that someone showed that we did that!!
Let's make it an international incident...
Offline
#464 2016-10-06 19:56:31
#465 2016-10-07 00:20:12
#466 2016-10-07 12:07:19
At least he wll already be up for when the call comes. And have his hand firmly on the send button.
Offline
#467 2016-10-07 14:59:56
If that guy sends his own Tweets I'm a monkey's uncle.
Hillary's PR team sends all that shit while he's corn-holing her.
Offline
#468 2016-10-08 08:06:58
Just grab them by the cat, and say "goodnight, Irene."
Offline
#469 2016-10-08 09:20:11
Offline
#470 2016-10-08 10:33:48
As I pointed out to Melons: We knew this about him already.
Offline
#471 2016-10-08 12:05:00
#472 2016-10-08 12:39:08
George Orr wrote:
Fucking gross, thanks Georgie that is not the connection I needed to make.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#473 2016-10-08 14:36:52
George, are you a TrollX by any chance?
Offline
#475 2016-10-09 02:10:49
Offline
#476 2016-10-09 12:40:39
XregnaR wrote:
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/mike-pence-stands-after-trump-disinvited-n662436
Fucking hypocrite. As I've read repeatedly on the net this weekend, Trump is they guy who'll rape you and Pence is the guy who'll let him off for it and then force you to carry the pregnancy to term.
Offline
#477 2016-10-09 14:11:47
Offline
#478 2016-10-09 15:51:59
#479 2016-10-09 18:34:21
I'd still rather have an intentional buffoon than the vampire from Wal-Mart.
Offline
#480 2016-10-09 20:59:20
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10 … -rape.html
This man's vileness seems to have no bottom at all.
Now he's assembled four women who claim to have been victimized by HRC's husband.
If he believes they are victims, then how can he parade them around like this to benefit himself?
I've never in my life before now said this and meant it: This man has no shame. No shame.
Offline
#481 2016-10-09 21:35:49
George Orr wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/09/trump-holds-press-conference-with-women-whove-accused-bill-clinton-sex-assault-rape.html
This man's vileness seems to have no bottom at all.
Now he's assembled four women who claim to have been victimized by HRC's husband.
If he believes they are victims, then how can he parade them around like this to benefit himself?
I've never in my life before now said this and meant it: This man has no shame. No shame.
Fair enough, but I suspect they were there because they wanted to be there. If anybody was an "anybody but Hillary" voter, these women are.
Offline
#482 2016-10-09 21:51:50
George Orr wrote:
I've never in my life before now said this and meant it: This man has no shame. No shame.
I no longer know any public servant in local, state or national office who does. I did, once.
They're -ALL- shameless, George, just in for your money.
Trump simply has no finesse.
Offline
#483 2016-10-09 21:55:05
choad wrote:
George Orr wrote:
I've never in my life before now said this and meant it: This man has no shame. No shame.
I no longer know any public servant in local, state or national office who does. I did, once.
They're -ALL- shameless, George, just in for your money.
Trump simply has no finesse.
^ what he said ^
Offline
#484 2016-10-09 23:29:31
Offline
#485 2016-10-10 09:59:56
choad wrote:
George Orr wrote:
I've never in my life before now said this and meant it: This man has no shame. No shame.
I no longer know any public servant in local, state or national office who does. I did, once.
They're -ALL- shameless, George, just in for your money.
Trump simply has no finesse.
Wow. And the attack on Christmas is like Dresden.
I fear you have lost perspective.
Offline
#486 2016-10-10 10:49:24
George Orr wrote:
These candidates vileness seems to have no bottom at all.
Now they've assembled people who claim to have been victimized by their opponent.
If they believes they are victims, then how can they parade them around like this to benefit themselves?
I've never in my life before now said this and meant it: These people have no shame. No shame.
There, fixed it for you.
My only concern is that your pattern of conversation seems to indicate that either one of these two is in some way acceptable.
Luv
Emmeran
Last edited by Emmeran (2016-10-10 10:51:51)
Offline
#487 2016-10-10 11:52:00
Fled wrote:
choad wrote:
They're -ALL- shameless, George, just in for your money.
Trump simply has no finesse.Wow. And the attack on Christmas is like Dresden.
I fear you have lost perspective.
Huh? Vonnegut argued convincingly the firebombing of Dresden was pointless and profited no one but him; book and movie rights earning him $2 to $3 for every man, woman and child killed there. I dunno from Christmas, Glen Beck or John Stewart.
Offline
#488 2016-10-10 12:13:36
choad wrote:
Fled wrote:
choad wrote:
They're -ALL- shameless, George, just in for your money.
Trump simply has no finesse.Wow. And the attack on Christmas is like Dresden.
I fear you have lost perspective.Huh? Vonnegut argued convincingly the firebombing of Dresden was pointless and profited no one but him; book and movie rights earning him $2 to $3 for every man, woman and child killed there. I dunno from Christmas, Glen Beck or John Stewart.
Considering the "official" number was around 25k killed, Vonnegut didn't make shit.
It's pretty much accepted these days that Dresden was payback for the Battle of Britain, Coventry, etc.
Offline
#489 2016-10-10 12:18:04
You know, in Clinton's own words it's not the person that did these things that is in the wrong, that doesn't really matter. It is the person who exposed these things to the public eye who is doing wrong.
Hey, what's good for the goose . . .
Last edited by Emmeran (2016-10-10 12:18:30)
Offline
#490 2016-10-12 04:42:15
Monkeyboy writes:
Here's something of a first, a [Manchester, NH] Union Leader editorial. This fat bastard goes after Shrillary and Trumpnocchio and rather neatly nails their hides to the barn door in a brief read. A regular Ambrose Bierce, this fat turd. I have to admit I might even buy him a beer and not feel too bad about it.
http://www.unionleader.com/Grant-Bosse- … g-10102016
Offline
#491 2016-10-13 16:55:25
Trump Is Retreating Into the Fringe Media's Far-Right Paranoid World as His Campaign Falls Apart
I still think the whole Trump candidacy has been one of these three.
1. A plot to destroy the Republican Party
2. A plot to implode the Republican Party and drive the Holy Rollers and Tea Party into obscurity whence they came.
3. A calculated bet that the non-voters are so polarized they won't get up and vote against Trump.
Offline
#492 2016-10-13 20:54:35
#493 2016-10-13 21:59:05
How can you be so blind? It's one party now, has been for the last decade.
Obama was supposed to be the buffoon candidate but then he went and won and to top it off he didn't fuck up, not in the least bit.
It was supposed to be Hillary for eight and then after a brief Obama (black) stint her daughter would run while a Repub (in name) won and then the Clintons got another 8 years to extend the family aristocracy.
For fucks sake they wrote the damn plan on the wall.
Last edited by Emmeran (2016-10-13 22:01:49)
Offline
#494 2016-10-14 08:53:02
Emmeran wrote:
How can you be so blind? It's one party now, has been for the last decade.
Obama was supposed to be the buffoon candidate but then he went and won and to top it off he didn't fuck up, not in the least bit.
It was supposed to be Hillary for eight and then after a brief Obama (black) stint her daughter would run while a Repub (in name) won and then the Clintons got another 8 years to extend the family aristocracy.
For fucks sake they wrote the damn plan on the wall.
Well, that plan didn't work out too well for the Kennedys did it?
They were, and to a point still are, two sides of the same coin. But I don't want these far right nutjobs influencing national politics any more than I want the far left doing the same. Jerry Rubin, et al., declared themselves to be Democrats but there was no way in hell the party was going to endorse them for any political office beyond dog catcher or mayor of a small town. Decades later when they mellowed, some of them were embraced but that was after they got over giving everybody the finger and wanting to watch the world burn.
Offline
#495 2016-10-14 19:13:00
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#496 2016-10-16 04:45:56
#497 2016-10-18 21:25:57
#498 2016-10-20 14:02:46
#499 2016-10-20 18:44:17
The whole damn thing looks like a couple of kids having a swordfight with dicks to me.
Offline
#500 2016-10-20 21:40:16
Hers may well be bigger
Offline