#1701 2022-08-12 00:28:45
If we don’t ask the hard questions about the potential motives of the FBI now, soon any one of us who buries our ex-wife in a small grave at the side of their golf course in order to gain a tax concession will be treated with suspicion.
Offline
#1702 2022-08-12 00:48:41
square wrote:
If we don’t ask the hard questions about the potential motives of the FBI now, soon any one of us who buries our ex-wife in a small grave at the side of their golf course in order to gain a tax concession will be treated with suspicion.
Brilliant!
Offline
#1703 2022-08-12 09:07:04
I'm not surprised, or even disappointed but, if this is true, he should go away forever.
The Washington Post: FBI searched Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence for classified nuclear documents
By Paul LeBlanc, CNN
Updated: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 04:30:14 GMT
Source: CNN
The FBI sought to locate classified documents related to nuclear weapons, among other items, when agents searched former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, this week, people familiar with the investigation told The Washington Post.
The people did not offer additional details to the Post about "what type of information the agents were seeking" or whether any such documents were recovered, according to the paper.
The revelation adds key context to the Justice Department's extraordinary decision to search the home of a former president.
As CNN previously reported, the criminal investigation started with concerns about missing documents raised by the National Archives, which made a criminal referral to the Justice Department upon discovering highly sensitive documents among the materials retrieved from Mar-a-Lago in January. The 15 boxes contained some materials that were part of special access programs (SAP), a classification that includes protocols to significantly limit who would have access to the information, according to a source familiar with what the Archives discovered in the boxes. That led to FBI interviews with aides to grand jury subpoenas to this week's court-authorized search and seizure of documents.
Though Attorney General Merrick Garland has declined to share specific details about the search, he said Thursday that he "personally approved" the decision to seek a warrant for the search of Trump's Florida home.
"The department does not take such a decision lightly. Where possible, it is standard practice to seek less intrusive means as an alternative to a search and to narrowly scope any search that is undertaken," Garland said in a news conference.
The attorney general also said that the Justice Department had filed a request in court that the search warrant and property receipt from the search be unsealed.
Trump said in a late-night post on his Truth Social platform Thursday that he would "not oppose the release of documents," adding, "I am going a step further by ENCOURAGING the immediate release of those documents."
CNN reported earlier Thursday that Trump and his legal team had not yet reached a decision on how to respond to the Justice Department's motion, according to a source familiar with their thinking.
Since the search, top congressional Republicans have rushed to Trump's defense, casting the move as politically motivated. The former President has denied all wrongdoing, claiming the investigation is intended to derail his potential bid to return to the White House.
In a pair of posts to Truth Social following Garland's statement, Trump continued to claim that his attorneys were "cooperating fully" and had developed "very good relationships" with federal investigators prior to Monday's search at Mar-a-Lago.
The search warrant had been authorized by a federal court, Garland said.
"It is a federal crime to remove classified documents wrongly. And so if you are filling out that affidavit and you have to list the crime, you can list that as the crime," said Elie Honig, a former federal and state prosecutor and a CNN senior legal analyst, following the search warrant.
This story has been updated with additional information Friday.
Offline
#1704 2022-08-12 17:50:57
Offline
#1705 2022-08-12 19:48:18
Is it too early to bring back chatter that Trump really is a Russian asset?
Offline
#1706 2022-09-11 22:28:58
Fuck Trump the GOP!
GOP donor pool unexpectedly shrinks as midterms near
In nine out of the 10 most competitive U.S. Senate races this cycle, Democrats have outraised their Republican counterparts. Fundraising alone does not decide elections, of course. Outside groups — often funded by deep-pocketed donors — can close some of the gaps for Republicans. But even those well-funded super PACs and nonprofits have finite resources, and the low online fundraising numbers have alarmed GOP professionals.
Prediction: GOP will declare that only money from rich doners equals free speech.
Offline
#1707 2022-09-12 17:43:37
Baywolfe wrote:
Fuck Trump the GOP!
GOP donor pool unexpectedly shrinks as midterms nearIn nine out of the 10 most competitive U.S. Senate races this cycle, Democrats have outraised their Republican counterparts. Fundraising alone does not decide elections, of course. Outside groups — often funded by deep-pocketed donors — can close some of the gaps for Republicans. But even those well-funded super PACs and nonprofits have finite resources, and the low online fundraising numbers have alarmed GOP professionals.
Prediction: GOP will declare that only money from rich doners equals free speech.
Wasn't that the point of Citizens United?
Offline
#1708 2022-09-12 19:56:40
BorderCount wrote:
Wasn't that the point of Citizens United?
It was certainly the intent, not the number of people donating, but how much they donated.
Offline
#1709 2022-10-02 15:44:40
#1710 2022-10-13 01:16:26
Offline
#1711 2022-10-13 22:30:06
Russell Brand calls Trump a coward, way oool video!
Offline
#1712 2022-10-16 17:44:27
Trigger Warning
Offline
#1713 2022-10-17 13:38:01
Offline
#1714 2022-10-17 13:58:17
Oh come now, we all know the Truth is out there.
Flowers: Did Biden win the election?
Greene: He’s the president
Flowers: You pushed a big lie that he did not win
Greene: There was election fraud and my husband has the proof
Offline
#1715 2022-10-18 06:25:29
The husband that's divorcing her?
Also, she's done a pretty good job of defaming her own character.
Offline
#1716 2022-10-22 15:10:35
Be Still My Beating Heart:
Offline
#1717 2022-10-23 13:45:22
Meanwhile, what the fuck does this even mean?
Offline
#1718 2022-10-23 14:37:23
Better question: Does it matter?
Offline
#1719 2022-10-24 12:00:25
"Don't struggle, It only makes it worse."
When I was a kid I thought quicksand was going to be a much bigger problem. I made it this far unscathed and now we have this Trump quicksand thing?
Offline
#1720 2022-11-17 11:26:00
#1721 2022-11-17 16:41:08
That was somehow even worse than I thought it would be.
Offline
#1722 2022-11-17 20:53:00
Another symptom of the rot. As the lyrics to the National Lampoon song Deteriorata say, "Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls would scarcely get your feet wet."
Offline
#1723 2022-12-02 23:50:55
#1724 2022-12-03 22:32:43
It writes itself now doesn't it?
Offline
#1725 2022-12-03 22:37:48
After a post like that, the only thing left to write about him is his epitaph.
Last edited by BorderCount (2022-12-03 22:38:55)
Offline
#1726 2022-12-04 00:59:02
BorderCount wrote:
After a post like that, the only thing left to write about him is his epitaph.
I was on one of the conservative sites "Oh, he doesn't mean that, he's just blowing off steam". This will the general consensus.
Offline
#1727 2022-12-04 11:00:51
SpacePuppy wrote:
BorderCount wrote:
After a post like that, the only thing left to write about him is his epitaph.
I was on one of the conservative sites "Oh, he doesn't mean that, he's just blowing off steam". This will the general consensus.
Edit: It's been two fucking years. And the latest rant has him down to the same four complaints.
Last edited by Baywolfe (2022-12-04 11:07:31)
Offline
#1728 2022-12-04 11:51:31
BorderCount wrote:
After a post like that, the only thing left to write about him is his epitaph.
Aren't we fortunate, he already penned copy for us!
Offline
#1729 2022-12-11 12:35:18
Offline
#1730 2022-12-15 20:08:34
I swear to Bahamut, you can't even dream of making this shit up anymore. Donald Trump NFT Trading cards for sale at $99 PER CARD. Buy 45 and you're "guaranteed" to have dinner with Donnie. This was his big announcement he teased yesterday. Back to doing what he does best, grifting.
Offline
#1731 2022-12-15 20:57:40
And, as expected, the ridicule has already begun.
Offline
#1732 2022-12-20 19:31:06
#1733 2022-12-20 19:46:39
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
I am just not sure when to get in to get out?
That's easy, in would be never, and out would be always.
Offline
#1734 2022-12-20 19:51:43
Well, that is no fun, no fun at all. :( And no way to get ahead, you can't win if you don't play.
Offline
#1735 2022-12-20 20:41:28
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
Well, that is no fun, no fun at all. :( And no way to get ahead, you can't win if you don't play.
Sometimes, it's just not worth playing.
Offline
#1736 2022-12-21 21:24:21
Johnny_Rotten wrote:
Well, that is no fun, no fun at all. :( And no way to get ahead, you can't win if you don't play.
Robert Heinlein certainly thought so.
Excerpts from the Notebooks of Lazarus Long
Certainly, the game is rigged. Don't let that stop you; if you don't bet, you can't win.
Offline
#1737 2022-12-25 08:54:28
#1738 2022-12-25 15:01:26
JetRx wrote:
You're comparing pushing to remove a corrupt official (which was our official and public policy goal) with demanding that the Ukrainians dig up dirt on your political opponent?
Offline
#1739 2022-12-25 15:20:13
Fled wrote:
JetRx wrote:
You're comparing pushing to remove a corrupt official (which was our official and public policy goal) with demanding that the Ukrainians dig up dirt on your political opponent?
It doesn't fit his narrative.
Offline
#1740 2022-12-25 19:05:11
DmtDusty wrote:
Fled wrote:
JetRx wrote:
You're comparing pushing to remove a corrupt official (which was our official and public policy goal) with demanding that the Ukrainians dig up dirt on your political opponent?
It doesn't fit his narrative.
He doesn't have a narrative. He has "talking" points fed to him by the Fox Box. Perhaps he thinks that by repeating all of this nonsense he'll someday be allowed to actually fellate Donald Trump.
Offline
#1741 2022-12-26 09:45:22
BorderCount wrote:
DmtDusty wrote:
Fled wrote:
You're comparing pushing to remove a corrupt official (which was our official and public policy goal) with demanding that the Ukrainians dig up dirt on your political opponent?
It doesn't fit his narrative.
He doesn't have a narrative. He has "talking" points fed to him by the Fox Box. Perhaps he thinks that by repeating all of this nonsense he'll someday be allowed to actually fellate Donald Trump.
No, this sounds more like Q. And Fox hates the Donald now as the Murdoch family are solid members of the GOP and they're towing the party line.
Offline
#1742 2023-01-12 16:11:12
#1743 2023-01-12 16:33:39
Even Trump's lawyers didn't buy that one.
Offline
#1744 2023-02-10 04:22:31
Offline
#1745 2023-02-21 16:44:29
Offline
#1746 2023-03-17 13:35:04
#1747 2023-03-26 21:57:33
The Best Rally, The Biggest, No Really, Nothing Ever Seen Like This In The USA! Bigly!
Offline
#1748 2023-03-27 06:01:43
Is that all vending along the sides?
What does he charge for a booth? Besides koolaid and hats to keep the old noggin cool as a cucumber, what else would sell? Are the crowds in a buying mood this tour?
Offline
#1749 2023-03-27 13:55:05
Yep. Of course. Grilled Cheese Sandwichs and Foot Massage (look it up, it's true!) Most of the crowd left early on. Donny not so entertaining.
Offline
#1750 2023-04-04 21:27:44
Ol' Motormouth just can't stop...
Offline