#1 2025-04-25 12:54:29

From This Morning:

https://s3.masto.ai/media_attachments/files/114/399/642/535/315/782/original/3dd9a003b3449ec3.png

Offline

 

#2 2025-04-25 13:43:45

So We Are Arresting Judges Now?

https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:wukvkboipybkhbqkbdp5dlyw/bafkreidkavoxtujpm5joepglueqhx7mgyuk4hmhk4moudwe4b76uis5neu@jpeg

Offline

 

#4 2025-04-26 22:51:42

Rules are for you, not for me.

FBI Director Kash Patel posted a photo on X Friday night of the Wisconsin judge who was arrested for allegedly obstructing immigration agents while she was handcuffed, being escorted to a vehicle by officials. . . .

According to the Confidentiality and Media Contacts Policy listed on the Justice Department’s website, DOJ personnel “should not voluntarily disclose a photograph of a defendant unless it serves a law enforcement function or unless the photograph is already part of the public record in the case.”

Offline

 

#5 2025-04-27 07:38:57

square wrote:

Rules are for you, not for me.

FBI Director Kash Patel posted a photo on X Friday night of the Wisconsin judge who was arrested for allegedly obstructing immigration agents while she was handcuffed, being escorted to a vehicle by officials. . . .

According to the Confidentiality and Media Contacts Policy listed on the Justice Department’s website, DOJ personnel “should not voluntarily disclose a photograph of a defendant unless it serves a law enforcement function or unless the photograph is already part of the public record in the case.”

Do you think they quietly change the policy on Monday? Besides, it's not like Bondi's gonna do anything about it.

Offline

 

#6 2025-04-27 10:57:14

BorderCountess wrote:

square wrote:

Rules are for you, not for me.

FBI Director Kash Patel posted a photo on X Friday night of the Wisconsin judge who was arrested for allegedly obstructing immigration agents while she was handcuffed, being escorted to a vehicle by officials. . . .

According to the Confidentiality and Media Contacts Policy listed on the Justice Department’s website, DOJ personnel “should not voluntarily disclose a photograph of a defendant unless it serves a law enforcement function or unless the photograph is already part of the public record in the case.”

Do you think they quietly change the policy on Monday? Besides, it's not like Bondi's gonna do anything about it.

They're convinced they can run the country by decrees on X and Executive Orders.

Offline

 

#7 2025-04-27 17:48:57

Baywolfe wrote:

BorderCountess wrote:

square wrote:

Rules are for you, not for me.

Do you think they quietly change the policy on Monday? Besides, it's not like Bondi's gonna do anything about it.

They're convinced they can run the country by decrees on X and Executive Orders.

Well, Congress has effectively decided to shirk its duties, and the courts only have as much power as they can get from the Marshals. So... they pretty much can.

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com