Sofie dear, while I do have a dark brown voice, it is nothing like that....more garbled, like I have shit in my mouth.....

Last edited by Lurker (2008-04-29 22:41:56)

did someone say ghey kin?

WilberCuntLicker
You are ignoring posts from this user [Show post]

You are such a sucker, bung-licker, that was posted to bait you. I must say, though you often profess your un-dying hatred for me, you still waste time and energy to follow me around. Sniffing at my droppings like hungry vermin....

Now, why don't you be a good little shit and go find something interesting to post.

Lurker wrote:

WilberCuntLicker
You are ignoring posts from this user [Show post]

You are such a sucker, bung-licker, that was posted to bait you. I must say, though you often profess your un-dying hatred for me, you still waste time and energy to follow me around. Sniffing at my droppings like hungry vermin....

Now, why don't you be a good little shit and go find something interesting to post.

Hatred? Haha...you flatter yourself - again. Your narcissism is only exceeded by your inanity.

pALEPHx wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Hatred? Haha...you flatter yourself - again. Your narcissism is only exceeded by your inanity.

And if the two of you have each other on Ignore, then it's really just the rest of us who have to watch you compete for attention without knowing if the other one already has it. Heh.

Lurker peeks. He'd pee himself if he didn't.

Lurker wrote:

I also can't resist peeing on lil' Willie...it is too easy though

Then truly, what is the merit of having each other in a killfile? I mean, seriously, I worked at a forum admin's site for a couple of years and never really understood the feature, except on really large boards where a person was unlikely to be booted just because a contingent of members found him/her insufferable, stupid, or both. It's not like the both of you can't readily stomach each other's casual barbs, and we've all had our 'drunk days' posting.

I'm certainly not proposing you two kiss and make up, but pulling your skirts up over your heads--when you're both pee[k]ing anyway--is close to pointless. The whole function should probably be scrapped. I think of the worst, most useless, misanthropic, miscreant Streeter, and I still can't see putting him on Ignore. The active posting group is simply too limited. Consider how many n00bs would put half a dozen regulars on there because, to them, Cruel is not even a memory.

If we had a steady influx of fresh meat around here, all this would be moot. I think I'll put Choad's affiliate button back onto my portal tomorrow. Not that it will invoke a stampede, mind you, but I really shouldn't be talking about increasing the member ranks unless I'm willing to do something on our behalf.

Pale, I'm really glad you're back.

square wrote:

That said, the feature is an experiment and one of the purposes is to see its effects and overall usefulness.

OK, at least now I understand where you're coming from on its intent. For a usenet, BBS, VAX, or any one of the older listserv type "boards"--from which HS' current forumware is barely distinguished--I get how the eradication of spam or perpetually uninteresting/irksome posters is/was a boon. We all remember what it was like to have the same person posting fifteen hundred versions of then-Goatse and whatnot. It really doesn't work as well on contemporary forums or social networking sites. Where one could be inundated with a thousand spurious messages overnight, here the issue is hardly so imperative (and I know there's another thread for all of this, but wotev). In its present incarnation, it only serves to increase antagonism, as the gestalt genepool is too shallow and the persons affected aren't going to realize why they might wanna change their tune because a killfile is just too passive-aggressive.

My ultimate point is this: If we're going to HAVE such a user-accessible accounting of "Who Hates Who the Mostest," then either the people topping it are to be dunned into changing their tack, or else we just figure they believe themselves to be "TEH CROOLIST OF TEH CRUELZ" and thereby consider their high 'rank' a compliment on how many people they've pissed off today. Not even Wilbur is that self-absorbed (and no, he wasn't the person I was thinking of, earlier...so there).

Taint wrote:

Pale, I'm really glad you're back.

Why, thank yeh, Mizz Scarlitt. ;)

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

We all are - you've tipped the balance, changing this back into a gay-positive forum.

Why, it's just like Mallomars in August, 'round here. Well, if it took nothing but my poppin' my head back up for the usual rounds of Whack-a-[ho]Mole, then I suppose I should be concerned just how you lot comported yourself in my Big Gay Absence. [wags gigantic, bejeweled finger]

I won't waste anyone's time gettin' all preachy on what usually makes for homo-negative, but let's not make this a Them/Them-er argument. Teh gheyz have historically enjoyed a certain "pride of place" among Cruelers (mostly because we're all not really as evil as we play on TV), but Ize juss goan keep on bein' lil ole me. If that results in a pseudo-catfight here and there, so be it, but I can't be goaded into the sort of cannibalism that seems to arise whenever a closeknit group starts inbreeding. I've learned my lessons, an' I mo shaddap now.

Hope everyone enjoyed the new raft o' bannerz.

P.S.: Sorry Pale...won't be able to open banners, apparently, until someone fixes my little sign-in problem. I'm sure they're delightful.

pALEPHx wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

But oh well, I'll soldier on without you.

If he's truly become as perfidious as you make him out to be

Perfidy I can respect. In this case it's the IQ drag and the general inanity. And besides, you know me, I'm not one to live and let live. After weeks of picking on you I realized that I was only continuing to do so because you fought back exquisitely. That's not happening in this case - it doesn't do exquisite. It does squealy and shrill. 

pALEPHx wrote:

In case you hadn't noticed, I'm doing my best not to be such a postwhore as I once was. Now that things appear to have hit a certain stride, I don't need to be checking every thread at the top of the hour and whatnot.

What changed? Let me guess...you became revulsed by some undisclosed hit whore (gobble gobble) and reformed?

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

P.S.: Sorry Pale...won't be able to open banners, apparently, until someone fixes my little sign-in problem. I'm sure they're delightful.

pALEPHx wrote:

I have to 'double-login' to access that page, myself (already logged in w/ cookie, click on 'banners,' hit login again). I dunno why, or if certain members are flagged to see/use it. You should be able to access it like anyone else unless you've been directly blocked from doing so, which I honestly know nothing of. Ask one of the big boys. I just click on the name of the banner and a bit of javascript shows even the undisplayed ones.

In my case, I'm logged in as an excommunicated sock puppet and I can't log out. In consequence, I have to log in as Wilber through a proxy, which won't give me access to all functions. Anyways, enough of this sphallolalia. I have two deadlines tomorrow...one in oncology, the other in Service Oriented Architecture...the two mix poorly...my brain may split in twain.

Addendum: Okay, nevermind the log-in problems...for some reason clearing my cache didn't work the first two times but it has now. For all that I used to build websites and cobble together computers I'm still a bit of a Luddite.

Last edited by WilberCuntLicker (2008-05-01 05:44:28)