headkicker_girl wrote:

Asshat -- do you really think that I want to have any sort of dialogue with you now?  I wish I could grow balls only so I could tell you to suck them.

Well thought out response to an intelligent post.  You make lawyers like Chris Darden and Marci Clark look competent.

sofaking wrote:

asshatery wrote:

Actually you’r missing a simple trick here.

Yeah, Girl. You're missing it. The trick is to place an apostophe in the word "your", thereby adding immeasurable amounts of credibility to one's claims of superior intelligence.

I'm glad the fucking typo police are on the case.  God forbid you fail to attack a cogent argument because of a typo!

I think 16 year olds should be banned from attempting to have debates on most things in life until they have actually gained some plausible life experience...

Go to college and get your degree first, or get a job in public office.  Then come on here and express your opinions backed up by something more than your uneducated opinion.

If you keep up the arguments with Headkicker girl, this thread could go on for weeks and get absolutely nowhere...

Chock on a cock...something tells me this wasn't an attempt at wit.  You need Hooked on Phonics but "yur hooked on dildonics."

Last edited by DoucheEllington (2007-10-16 23:17:00)

Dirckman wrote:

I like guilt free sex with multiple partners and drinking Scotch..........

Scotch is for pussies.  Drink some Stroh 80.

asshatery wrote:

headkicker_girl wrote:

Asshat -- do you really think that I want to have any sort of dialogue with you now?  I wish I could grow balls only so I could tell you to suck them.

Well thought out response to an intelligent post.  You make lawyers like Chris Darden and Marci Clark look competent.

Listen, prick, you're new here, so I'll let you in on a little secret.  The lawyer comments don't have any effect on me.  It's old and tired.  Do you really think you're the first?  First, you've added nothing new on that topic.  Second, you don't know anything about me or my legal practice so how could you possibly think your opinion means shit to me?  I could speculate about your competence as a soldier, but really, it just doesn't interest me.  In addition, "cunt" likewise has no effect on me.  Throw it around all you want. 

As for your "intelligent post," as Sofie would say, niggah please.  Your comment that there is "no such thing as a natural monopoly" is more nonsense that you are attempting to pass off as scholarship.  The term "natural monopoly" has no meaning.  Either one exists or is doesn't.  It didn't grow out of the fucking ground, and the government didn't create it.  I simply don't have the patience to respond to someone who clearly has no clue.

EDIT:  RT -- I'm done with him.

Last edited by headkicker_girl (2007-10-16 23:17:16)

headkicker_girl wrote:

asshatery wrote:

headkicker_girl wrote:

Asshat -- do you really think that I want to have any sort of dialogue with you now?  I wish I could grow balls only so I could tell you to suck them.

Well thought out response to an intelligent post.  You make lawyers like Chris Darden and Marci Clark look competent.

Listen, prick, you're new here, so I'll let you in on a little secret.  The lawyer comments don't have any effect on me.  It's old and tired.  Do you really think you're the first?  First, you've added nothing new on that topic.  Second, you don't know anything about me or my legal practice so how could you possibly think your opinion means shit to me?  I could speculate about your competence as a soldier, but really, it just doesn't interest me.  In addition, "cunt" likewise has no effect on me.  Throw it around all you want. 

As for your "intelligent post," as Sofie would say, niggah please.  Your comment that there is "no such thing as a natural monopoly" is more nonsense that you are attempting to pass off as scholarship.  The term "natural monopoly" has no meaning.  Either one exists or is doesn't.  It didn't grow out of the fucking ground, and the government didn't create it.  I simply don't have the patience to respond to someone who clearly has no clue.

I just figured it out,, I am so sorry the rest of you citizens of High Street.  HK is really a 12 year old boy pretending to be a hot lawyer chick.    See if this person were a lawyer, they would know antics with semantics is the defense of desperation, a la "It depends on what the definition of "is" is".  Ahh Clinton you were so great to bad you were disbarred. 

As for the definition of Natural as being something that grows out of the ground, you obviously missed that whole natural law theory that was the basis of most systems of law before the English Common Law system. 

I do give you props you had me going for what 10 posts, good job, I hang my head in shame.


edit- Oh yeah I was here long before you, and will be here long after you.

P.P.S.  You can call me Soldier all you want, I think its sexy.

In Conclusion

To paraphrase Aristotle


I love Scotch, but I love Burbon more.

Last edited by asshatery (2007-10-16 23:25:11)

asshatery wrote:

I just figured it out,, I am so sorry the rest of you citizens of High Street.  HK is really a 12 year old boy pretending to be a hot lawyer chick.    See if this person were a lawyer, they would know antics with semantics is the defense of desperation, a la "It depends on what the definition of "is" is".  Ahh Clinton you were so great to bad you were disbarred. 

As for the definition of Natural as being something that grows out of the ground, you obviously missed that whole natural law theory that was the basis of most systems of law before the English Common Law system. 

I do give you props you had me going for what 10 posts, good job, I hang my head in shame.

Natural law is an archaic theory that only legal halfwits like Clarence Thomas espouse.  It has absolutely nothing to do with a contemporary discussion of free market theory.  If you were using the term "natural monopoly" as arising out of a system of law prior to English common law, I have doubts about your sanity and must now embrace RT's contention that you are a babbling psychotic.

asshatery wrote:

Cum Dumpster,  I didn't say that I knew it in High School.  You would never ever ever make it in a contract negotiation.

This from someone who can't even spell their own handle.

By the way, headkicker, why is it that people are so threatened by your job as a chihuahua trainer?  Do you get this a lot by people outside of High-Street who fancy themselves chihuahua-training geniuses?

headkicker_girl wrote:

asshatery wrote:

I just figured it out,, I am so sorry the rest of you citizens of High Street.  HK is really a 12 year old boy pretending to be a hot lawyer chick.    See if this person were a lawyer, they would know antics with semantics is the defense of desperation, a la "It depends on what the definition of "is" is".  Ahh Clinton you were so great to bad you were disbarred. 

As for the definition of Natural as being something that grows out of the ground, you obviously missed that whole natural law theory that was the basis of most systems of law before the English Common Law system. 

I do give you props you had me going for what 10 posts, good job, I hang my head in shame.

Natural law is an archaic theory that only legal halfwits like Clarence Thomas espouse.  It has absolutely nothing to do with a contemporary discussion of free market theory.  If you were using the term "natural monopoly" as arising out of a system of law prior to English common law, I have doubts about your sanity and must now embrace RT's contention that you are a babbling psychotic.

Yeah Natural Law may seem Archaic to a positivist, and actualy it does have a lot to do with free market theory.  Fucking Jesus Christ and the little apples you really believe all the shit they pumped into your head.  I am saying that a Monopoly can not arise in nature you thick witted twat, that there must be government intervention to create a monopoly.  Seriously read some fucking books.

Commander's Palace Turtle Soup au Sherry

10 ounces (2-1/2 sticks) unsalted butter
3/4 cup all-purpose flour
1 pound turtle meat, cut into 1/2-inch cubes
1 cup minced celery (4 stalks)
2 medium onions, minced (2 medium)
1-1/2 teaspoons garlic, minced
3 bay leaves
1 teaspoon oregano
1/2 teaspoon thyme
1/2 teaspoon freshly ground black pepper
1-1/2 cups tomato purée
1 quart beef stock
NOTE: If turtle bones are available, add them to the beef bones when making the stock for this dish
Salt and freshly ground black pepper to taste, as needed
1/2 cup lemon juice
5 hard-boiled eggs, finely chopped
1 tablespoon minced parsley
6 teaspoons dry sherry
Melt 8 ounces (2 sticks) butter in a heavy saucepan. Add the flour and cook, stirring frequently, over medium heat until the roux is light brown. Set aside.
In a 5-quart saucepan, melt the remaining butter and add turtle meat. Cook over high heat until the meat is brown. Add celery, onions, garlic and seasonings, and cook until the vegetables are transparent.

Add tomato purée, lower heat and simmer for 10 minutes. Add the stock and simmer for 30 minutes. Add the roux and cook over low heat, stirring, until the soup is smooth and thickened. Correct seasoning with salt and pepper to taste. Add lemon juice, eggs and parsley.

Remove from heat and serve. At the table, add 1 teaspoon sherry to each soup plate.

RT they are just having a bit of fun.  Might as well let them duke it out in here afore it spills over into the rest of the board.

Last edited by scsotdc (2007-10-17 10:14:21)

Jesus, it was a joke...plus I had a bunch of drugs in me.  If you didn't notice, the thread is still open.  I leave my moderating to messing with a few user names, and deleting spam...