#51 2008-05-10 02:07:22
sofaking wrote:
path to enlightenment
Why don't you [we] educate us on same path?
Offline
#52 2008-05-10 02:12:21
MSG Tripps wrote:
sofaking wrote:
path to enlightenment
Why don't you [we] educate us on same path?
Because we all walk a different path heading to the same place, Brother Dhal.
Your path to hell is quite different than Wilber's.
You ask too many questions.
Would you care for some Kool-Aid?
Offline
#53 2008-05-10 02:19:43
sofaking wrote:
Would you care for some Kool-Aid?
Sure, if it will cause you to feel better.
Offline
#54 2008-05-10 02:21:12
MSG Tripps wrote:
sofaking wrote:
Would you care for some Kool-Aid?
Sure, if it will cause you to feel better.
Offline
#55 2008-05-10 02:22:47
Rag, mama, rag.
Offline
#58 2008-05-10 13:03:14
For Lurky:
Offline
#59 2008-05-10 13:06:56
For Tojo:
Offline
#60 2008-05-10 13:09:26
Offline
#61 2008-05-10 13:13:12
Because I says So!
Offline
#62 2008-05-10 14:01:58
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
sofaking wrote:
Has anyone commanded you to touch their wiener to attain salvation?
Taint tried that on me. So did someone else, but I won't mention his name, cuz I don't wanna get banned.
Your lips said no, but your eyes said "Take me you savage brute! Ravish me, plunder me!" What was I supposed to do?
Offline
#63 2008-05-10 14:04:06
Offline
#64 2008-05-10 14:19:39
Good morning sofaking.
Offline
#65 2008-05-10 14:44:52
I can find no Nader-on-Buckley-on Ben Vereen erotica or illustrations, much less anything involving any of these three and a dinosaur or The Fonz.
Offline
#66 2008-05-10 15:13:14
MSG Tripps wrote:
Good morning sofaking.
Good morning, Dhalface.
Offline
#67 2008-05-10 17:31:08
Look, I'm not going to post the whole damn thing here, but...
...google "simpcest". Get out Bart, I'm piss.
Oh, and turning this thread into anything but rule 34 pics will fuck it. Shut up and get on posting images that ruin childhood memories.
Yeah, that last one's Mr. Rogers.
Offline
#68 2008-05-10 17:34:01
...and here. Simpcest at it's finest (worst?):
Offline
#69 2008-05-10 18:03:02
tits_matilda wrote:
I can find no Nader-on-Buckley-on Ben Vereen erotica or illustrations, much less anything involving any of these three and a dinosaur or The Fonz.
Which completely disproves the Rule 34 Theorem.
Offline
#70 2008-05-10 20:26:03
raoul.duke wrote:
She's been prime fappin' material for me since SNL in high school. Thank you.
Last edited by whiskytangofoxtrot (2008-05-10 20:26:18)
Offline
#71 2008-05-10 21:02:38
raoul.duke wrote:
Oh, and turning this thread into anything but rule 34 pics will fuck it. Shut up and get on posting images that ruin childhood memories.
Curious you should be so avid about ruining childhood memories. What are you trying to kill? I suspected you had unresolved individuation issues when you posted pics of dead kitties and bunnies. Not to mention the name, and the imitative prose. Emotional neglect? Abandonment? Sexual abuse? Got any pics?
Offline
#72 2008-05-10 21:13:34
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
raoul.duke wrote:
Oh, and turning this thread into anything but rule 34 pics will fuck it. Shut up and get on posting images that ruin childhood memories.
Curious you should be so avid about ruining childhood memories. What are you trying to kill? I suspected you had unresolved individuation issues when you posted pics of dead kitties and bunnies. Not to mention the name, and the imitative prose. Emotional neglect? Abandonment? Sexual abuse? Got any pics?
Terrible trolling.
0/10.
Offline
#73 2008-05-10 21:31:42
raoul.duke wrote:
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
raoul.duke wrote:
Oh, and turning this thread into anything but rule 34 pics will fuck it. Shut up and get on posting images that ruin childhood memories.
Curious you should be so avid about ruining childhood memories. What are you trying to kill? I suspected you had unresolved individuation issues when you posted pics of dead kitties and bunnies. Not to mention the name, and the imitative prose. Emotional neglect? Abandonment? Sexual abuse? Got any pics?
Terrible trolling.
0/10.
You, son, are a coward.
Offline
#74 2008-05-10 22:28:50
Offline
#75 2008-05-11 02:37:04
Offline
#76 2008-05-11 03:09:54
Alllll-vinnnn!
Offline
#81 2008-05-11 08:12:17
Fled wrote:
I see mom stuck on her special day, but I don't see anything that proves it's in the kitchen.
Offline
#82 2008-05-11 08:12:48
What, no Small Wonder pr0n?
Offline
#83 2008-05-11 17:22:15
Offline
#84 2008-05-11 17:28:05
1/6.
Rule 34: If it exists, there is porn of it.
Now, photoshoop those so the old lady is getting gang-fucked by the ghostbusters, and you have rule 34.
Offline
#85 2008-05-11 17:38:23
raoul.duke wrote:
Now, photoshoop those so the old lady is getting gang-fucked by the ghostbusters, and you have rule 34.
Can't you tell? She's sitting on a vibrating butt plug shaped like Pope Benedict.
Offline
#86 2008-05-11 19:08:47
raoul.duke
[i wrote:Rule 34: If it exists, there is porn of it.[/i]
Now, photoshoop those so the old lady is getting gang-fucked by the ghostbusters, and you have rule 34.
What, no old memories of dear ol GramGram?
Offline
#87 2008-05-11 22:06:55
Offline
#88 2008-05-11 22:36:57
Offline
#89 2008-05-11 23:22:31
Offline
#90 2008-05-12 00:31:26
north korean porn
Offline
#91 2008-05-12 00:50:54
icangetyouatoe wrote:
north korean porn
http://i29.tinypic.com/nbumuh.jpg
Naked Kim Jong Il approves.
Offline
#92 2008-05-12 03:20:08
Offline
#93 2008-05-12 03:26:41
Holly fuck, Square. Hokay, sticky it is.
Offline
#94 2008-05-12 04:04:23
Last edited by Johnny_Rotten (2008-05-12 04:04:53)
Offline
#95 2008-05-12 19:02:50
Offline
#96 2008-05-12 21:05:05
yeah, much to your chagrin....
and Choad, let the QB thread die so that teh kitteh thread may live....besides, I don't want penix soiling it with his verbal diahreaah....
Last edited by Lurker (2008-05-12 21:09:45)
Offline
#97 2008-05-12 23:02:50
Offline
#98 2008-05-12 23:28:08
A little closer to the concept, perhaps. Yabba dabba doo.
Offline
#100 2008-05-12 23:38:48
Why is it every time I scroll down this page my fucking browser stops at Bea Arthur's disheveled milk bags?
Offline