#1 2008-05-15 17:12:44
...but good news nonetheless.
Each of the four counts carries a maximum possible penalty of five years in prison.
Offline
#2 2008-05-15 17:24:31
Let's all say it together and see if it works again.
LURKER: THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT YOU.
LURKER: THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT YOU.
LURKER: THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT YOU.
Offline
#3 2008-05-15 17:32:51
Wilbur, the world would be a better place without ALL of us. One isn't going to make much of a difference.
Offline
#4 2008-05-15 18:09:32
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
Let's all say it together and see if it works again.
LURKER: THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT YOU.
LURKER: THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT YOU.
LURKER: THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT YOU.
Why the fuck are you doing this here?
Offline
#5 2008-05-16 02:47:35
As much as this is a horrible tragedy of bullying gone wrong I have a problem with these charges. I find it hard to believe they are even laws. Wit this standard each and everyone of us could be put away for 5 years for encouraging Emily Strange to show us her tits and then derisively smirking about her afterwards.
Drew was charged with one count of conspiracy and three counts of accessing protected computers without authorization to get information used to inflict emotional distress on the girl.
I haven't read the statue to see how it is defined, but how does having an anonymous flamewar under a psuedonym on a message board like myspace count as acsessing protected computers?
Offline
#6 2008-05-16 03:06:53
George Orr wrote:
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
Let's all say it together and see if it works again.
LURKER: THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT YOU.
LURKER: THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT YOU.
LURKER: THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE WITHOUT YOU.Why the fuck are you doing this here?
Relevancy ratio: 6.5/10. (Not bad for this place.)
Subtlety ratio: 2/GO. (Don't ask me to explain that one...it's an indefensible gibe.)
Required reading material:
"Megan hanged herself at home in October 2006, allegedly after receiving a dozen or more cruel messages,
including one stating the world would be better off without her."
Quod erat etc. 
Offline
#8 2008-05-16 04:25:13
jesusluvspegging wrote:
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
When the kid upstairs was 12, he developed the charming habit of rapping on my livingroom windows and pressing his ass against the panes. First, however, a 100%er all the way to the end, he would spread his buttocks as far apart as possible, exposing everything up to the liver and spleen. After a minute or two of steatopygial gyration he would unlock himself from the glass, leaving a little shit circle, like lipstick in a woman's kleenex, except brown, behind him on my window. For a time I considered coating the glass with clear capsicum, but since he quickly outgrew the habit, I didn't bother. He's 17 now, and denies this story's plausibilty. But as I point out to his little friends as they toke up in the garden, the facts of the matter remain where he left them, clear evidence of his coarse and slovenly behaviour.
Offline
#9 2008-05-16 04:37:05
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
steatopygial
I like the cut of your jib.
Offline
#10 2008-05-16 05:00:55
jesusluvspegging wrote:
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
steatopygial
I like the cut of your jib.
Why thank you, Anal Jesus! Words pertaining to the buttocks are one of my specialities.
I did three years of med school, only to find out the hard way that the Canadian medical system will not change its stance on the wearing of gloves for proctological examinations. I was young, rebellious, and certain that, given time, I could find intimations of sub-epithelial polyps with my highly sensitive fingertips. There were complaints from patients who said they weren't expecting their digital rectal to involve quite so many digits. Sadly, I was turned out of school and forced to give up on my dreams, although once in a while I'll give a free, strictly amateur exam to a close friend or worried acquaintance, just to keep my hand in.
Last edited by WilberCuntLicker (2008-05-16 05:01:30)
Offline
#11 2008-05-16 09:31:16
As much as this is a horrible tragedy of bullying gone wrong I have a problem with these charges.
Agreed. On the legal side, I too would like to understand the statute. Sometimes prosecutors strain to apply statutes for political or other imprper reasons. In this instance, you had dueling kids, apparently with some adult involvement, and one kid had a vulnerability, the equivalent of an "egg-shell skull." The better remedy, if any, would probably be in civil court.
I do sympathize with the family of the girl who committed suicide. Harassment on the internets can have a very negative impact on a child. When my daughter was 13, a group of boys decided to bombard her and her friends with email that claimed (falsely) all sorts of sexual exploits with her (including a number of things, like a Dirty Sanchez, I am sure she had never even heard of), and threatening rape, etc. Two of them used AOL accounts, and through a freind who worked there I tracked them down. After a long chat with the parents of each of them it all stopped with no further repercussions. 'Interesting, two sets of parents immediately laid into their sons. Another, a highly placed political appointee with the Bush Administration, played very coy and refused to acknowledge that his son had anything to do with it despite being presented with the email track and his sons admitted screen name and email address, and confesssions by other boys that involved his son. I got up to leave and advised him that I would be calling the police and the Washington Post within the hour. His approach changed quickly, and his son was dragged into the room for some ritual humiliation. All in all, it worked out satisfactorily.
Last edited by Fled (2008-05-16 09:32:39)
Offline
#12 2008-05-16 11:02:30
Fled wrote:
When my daughter was 13
That is appalling. It would be appalling if it happened to a grown woman able to look after herself; but for a 13-year-old it could have done lasting damage.
You sound like a good father. Instead of picking up a baseball bat or a shotgun (as I'd have been tempted to do), you went for the real smashdown on those little shits.
Offline
#13 2008-05-16 11:16:47
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
the facts of the matter remain where he left them
Please use Windex once every five years, at minimum. Thanks.
Offline
