#1 2008-07-07 03:52:31
in Australia. Even for the girl without panties:
"I'm really, really offended by what [Prime Minister] Kevin Rudd said about this picture."
Offline
#2 2008-07-07 08:51:38
It's an art magazine. Of course it's full of nude pictures? Why else would the Black Turtleneck crowd buy it? For the insipid watercolors? Bah!
Offline
#3 2008-07-07 09:46:48
I don't know art, but I know what I like.
And the picture in question actually sucks.
Offline
#4 2008-07-07 13:03:36
Closeted and latent pedophiles expose themselves through acts of puritanical repression.
Only a pedophile would censor something as benign as this:
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by WilberCuntLicker (2008-07-07 13:04:20)
Offline
#5 2008-07-07 14:30:33
It looks like a cheap painting that you buy from one of those TV-advertised "Fine Art Artists" sales, where the main selling feature is that they are "sofa sized"*. (*with apologies to Sophie... I don't know what size you are, but I'm sure you're a very lovely size indeed.)
I've seen better quality come from fucking pikers who make stuff using a paint-by-numbers set and sell it at garage sales.
Hey, do you suppose she learned her drawing skills from the Jon Gnagy school?
(Now there's a blast from your past, Choad).
Or perhaps she picked up all that talent from Bob Ross....
Ooooohhhh... I adore that "Wet-on-Wet Technique"©, Bob... it makes me so...... well......... wet.
Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-07-07 15:13:24)
Offline
#6 2008-07-07 15:21:01
Deplore the art, hate the painter, revile the frame or the colour of the wall it's hanging on. Those are all normal reactions, and yawningly predictable. But when people start calling for censorship based on subject material, you can be sure there are psycho-sexual forces at work in the political arena. But oh, glory, you Americans have the First Amendment protecting you, so you're immune from the spasms, phantasms, and pocket-pool orgasms of the puritanical right. Right? You can safely hang nude pics of your kids on your walls (like many of our parents have done in the past) and even send the negs to the store for processing. Rights are only worth shit if you're willing to kill (or, I suppose, practice satyagraha) for them. Sheeple don't deserve rights. They deserve Reichs. Tiered facism is the ideal political system for humans, with rights and privileges going to the productive and intelligent; restrictions, beatings and sterilization for the inherently intolerant, criminal and mediocre. (I'm in a foul mood today! Anyone want to come over and play "Utopian Dictatorship"? I go first.)
Offline
