That lady just turned a chocolate cake into a raspberry cake!!!

I'll bet that cake was from a mix.

jesusluvspegging wrote:

lechero wrote:

Wasn't she cast as the bug typewriter in Naked Lunch?

She's a bit young to have been in Naked Lunch, wouldn't you think?

Great movie.  Totally unrelated to the book.

Also: Brownie points to the poster of the best sheet-cake pun.

I already threw in my pun, but I still haven't been told how to collect my prize from the recent caption contest that I won....

jesusluvspegging wrote:

lechero wrote:

Wasn't she cast as the bug typewriter in Naked Lunch?

She's a bit young to have been in Naked Lunch, wouldn't you think?

No, I'm certain of it. The resemblance is clenching.

That must be a Duncan Hines cake.

Last edited by Banjo (2008-07-18 09:37:20)

Seems to work well for the purposes here though. So, yes, if you're a cake enthusiast it is probably not a great cake. However, if you are a cakefart enthusaist, it appears to serve its purpose well.

It's all a matter of perspective.

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Woody wrote:

Seems to work well for the purposes here though. So, yes, if you're a cake enthusiast it is probably not a great cake. However, if you are a cakefart enthusaist, it appears to serve its purpose well.

It's all a matter of perspective.

I suppose you have a point there, but when you're making crossover fetish porn, wouldn't you want to include the best elements of all the fetishes you're combining?  Besides, wouldn't it be better from a cakefart perspective for her to be defiling, say, a nicely decorated wedding cake with her gaseous emissions?

She's probably not into uppidy white cakes. She likes her chocolate gangster cakes.

That's not a cake. It's bread pooting.

Scotty wrote:

I'm assuming by Orangina's post above that the site has died as I am unable to access it.

Damn. It was an instant classic, too. Hardest I've laughed since finding this site.

How's it been hangin, Scotty? Long time.

I make a motion to include a new definition into the High-Street Lexicon

A post, either a main post or comment to a post is long winded, pointless and it's intention cannot immediately be determined is now a cakefart.

DEAR INTERNET:
THE NEARLY RELIGIOUS ECSTASY EXPERIENCED BY MANY UPON THE VIEWING OF CAKEFARTS
HAS OVERWHELMED OUR SERVERS AND MADE OUR HOST VERY ANGRY WITH US.

BUT GOD HAS BROUGHT US CAKEFARTS, AND NONE BUT HE SHALL TAKE IT AWAY.

CHECK BACK NEXT WEEK WHEN WE HAVE NEW HOSTS AND BETTER BANDWIDTH.

LOVE,

--CAKEFARTS

Guess I missed my chance.

Snotty wrote:

orangeplus wrote:

I make a motion to include a new definition into the High-Street Lexicon

A post, either a main post or comment to a post is long winded, pointless and it's intention cannot immediately be determined is now a cakefart.

Why not just ask Wilbur to change his name?  Save us all the trouble of posting it each and every time.

Eat my cakefart, cock-breath.

There's a mirror of the video

Also, whoever's responsible for this remarkable thing has been putting some legwork into it, spamming message boards with lurid descriptions of cakefarting and linking back to cakefarts.  Exhibit A.  Exhibit B.

Last edited by jesusluvspegging (2008-07-18 17:12:45)

orangeplus wrote:

I make a motion to include a new definition into the High-Street Lexicon

A post, either a main post or comment to a post is long winded, pointless and it's intention cannot immediately be determined is now a cakefart.

I propose that cakefart instead be declared when a thread wanders way the hell off of the topic at hand, as with the MUD digression over in the bitch-about-the-backend thread.

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

jesusluvspegging wrote:

orangeplus wrote:

I make a motion to include a new definition into the High-Street Lexicon

A post, either a main post or comment to a post is long winded, pointless and it's intention cannot immediately be determined is now a cakefart.

I propose that cakefart instead be declared when a thread wanders way the hell off of the topic at hand, as with the MUD digression over in the bitch-about-the-backend thread.

I think we should revisit that MUD discussion here.

CAKEFART!

Schiff wrote:

This is Mandy Taylor. She's not only *farting* on her birthday cake, but gives it a lap-dance afterwards. Pretty hilarious!

http://rapidshare.com/files/79323483/cake.wmv

Same question as before, but twice as seriously.

pALEPHx wrote:

jesusluvspegging wrote:

I propose that cakefart instead be declared when a thread wanders way the hell off of the topic at hand, as with the MUD digression over in the bitch-about-the-backend thread.

So "calling cakefart" on someone is like the converse of an asshat, "it's never been mentioned before, but doesn't belong in this discussion?" That's gonna get pretty rough. We like to digress here on the Street.

I agree, and I wouldn't like to put any dampers on those digressions. 

I propose a narrowing of the definition of cakefart to mean when a thread wanders way the hell off of the topic at hand, then becoming a discussion about something that only two, possibly three, people care about and contribute to, but which bores the everlasting tits off of everybody else.

George Orr wrote:

I propose a narrowing of the definition of cakefart to mean when a thread wanders way the hell off of the topic at hand, then becoming a discussion about something that only two, possibly three, people care about and contribute to, but which bores the everlasting tits off of everybody else.

This, too, is dangerous. Daring people to find something boring at High Street is like telling a pederast that all children have AIDS. You'll get too many people with knee-jerk reactions and whose funny bone hasn't been tickled enough. I certainly wouldn't want to be the arbiter of that fate. If we HAVE to incorporate 'cakefart' into our private vernacular, then it should apply to "perverse ideas that please only few." We still have to recognize that this will capture balloon, stiletto, latex, and furry fetishists. Since we enjoy making fun of them all, then I say cakefart the lot.

jesusluvspegging wrote:

pALEPHx wrote:

This, too, is dangerous. Daring people to find something boring at High Street is like telling a pederast that all children have AIDS. You'll get too many people with knee-jerk reactions and whose funny bone hasn't been tickled enough. I certainly wouldn't want to be the arbiter of that fate. If we HAVE to incorporate 'cakefart' into our private vernacular, then it should apply to "perverse ideas that please only few." We still have to recognize that this will capture balloon, stiletto, latex, and furry fetishists. Since we enjoy making fun of them all, then I say cakefart the lot.

MUDs fall under that category, right?

No! MUDS are not cakefart! Dik u JLP!

This site was way ahead of the curve on this "Cakefarts" thing.

For what it's worth.

So....  therefore cakefart is something that is called with hindsight?

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

"ephemeral grotesque."

Rimbaud and Morrison.  The word whore thing?

Hey Taint.