#1 2008-07-24 00:04:54
and the Perp is out on "post conviction, pre-sentencing bail"
Hmmm, I wonder what we would find if we stopped by the Judges house??
Offline
#3 2008-07-24 01:51:26
Maybe Headkick can answer this, although my question really stems from complete ignorance. If a person is convicted by a jury and a sentence is issued, is the man regarded as guilty if the judge postpones his sentence as in this case? I'm assuming the answer is 'yes', but I really don't know. Any takers?
Offline
#4 2008-07-24 02:05:07
Taint wrote:
Maybe Headkick can answer this, although my question really stems from complete ignorance. If a person is convicted by a jury and a sentence is issued, is the man regarded as guilty if the judge postpones his sentence as in this case? I'm assuming the answer is 'yes', but I really don't know. Any takers?
I would think so. Considering that they have this guy on the pedo list and GPSed.
His profile says he's only 5'4". He's gonna have a hell of a time in prison.
Offline
#5 2008-07-24 05:27:02
sofaking wrote:
Taint wrote:
Maybe Headkick can answer this, although my question really stems from complete ignorance. If a person is convicted by a jury and a sentence is issued, is the man regarded as guilty if the judge postpones his sentence as in this case? I'm assuming the answer is 'yes', but I really don't know. Any takers?
I would think so. Considering that they have this guy on the pedo list and GPSed.
His profile says he's only 5'4". He's gonna have a hell of a time in prison.
At least it'll be easier on his knees.
Offline
#6 2008-07-24 07:31:33
Taint wrote:
Maybe Headkick can answer this, although my question really stems from complete ignorance. If a person is convicted by a jury and a sentence is issued, is the man regarded as guilty if the judge postpones his sentence as in this case? I'm assuming the answer is 'yes', but I really don't know. Any takers?
Your assumption is correct. I believe the only way the answer would be otherwise at the trial level after the jury has rendered a verdict would be if the judge entered "judgment notwithstanding the verdict" (judgment "N.O.V."). Since the judge issued a sentence, judgment N.O.V. would make no sense. Just don't ask me about jury nullo.
Offline
#7 2008-07-24 07:43:11
Fled wrote:
Just don't ask me about jury nullo.
Jury nullo? You mean you have to find a dozen of these every time you want to have a trial?
I didn't realize it was so popular.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#8 2008-07-24 08:44:40
jesusluvspegging wrote:
Fled wrote:
Just don't ask me about jury nullo.
Jury nullo? You mean you have to find a dozen of these every time you want to have a trial?
https://cruelery.com/uploads/thumbs/36_penec1.jpg
I didn't realize it was so popular.
You only need a nullo when the judge is a pedeophiac.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#9 2008-07-24 12:29:45
Thanks, Wilber, I thought I was already pushing my "Rules of Writing Bitch" quota.
Offline
