#1 2008-08-25 20:17:06

Or is the media inferring too much?

Offline

 

#2 2008-08-25 20:22:13

Thank goodness my kid is a dual citizen....

Offline

 

#3 2008-08-25 20:49:49

My younger male relatives all know to say they are major queers if they receive a draft notice.

Offline

 

#4 2008-08-25 20:58:34

fnord wrote:

My younger male relatives all know to say they are major queers if they receive a draft notice.

Well that will go out the window if your candidate gets in.

Offline

 

#5 2008-08-25 21:04:46

I'm totally into the idea, that if we're going to stay in Iraq and Afghanistan, we should reintroduce the draft and it should include everyone from 20 to 30 years old, only medical exemptions. We can cause more havoc at home AND abroad that way.

Offline

 

#6 2008-08-25 21:42:44

Dmtdust wrote:

fnord wrote:

My younger male relatives all know to say they are major queers if they receive a draft notice.

Well that will go out the window if your candidate gets in.

Not at all.  It would take an act of congress to repeal the gay cannon fodder exemption, and most congressmen represent districts where the majority believes keeping the queers out of the military is necessary for national security.

Offline

 

#7 2008-08-25 21:49:41

First they wanna get married and now they wanna go to war and get shot to death for the corporate masters?  Are there any other ways straight people fuck up their own lives that you queerboys would like to co-opt?

Maybe we could have a gay lottery where random fag couples are given a baby that they have to care for, thus simulating the one last, great existential horror that we have and they don't?

Offline

 

#8 2008-08-25 22:03:28

A draft. 

[chortle]

Offline

 

#10 2008-08-26 00:39:16

Amazing.  My first thought was the video cuts him off and we don't hear what else he said (such as possibly realizing what he said and correcting it).  But I found other footage and it looks like he didn't.  And I can't see any sign that his campaign has "tried to set the record straight" on the statement.

Offline

 

#11 2008-08-26 01:30:47

headkicker_girl wrote:

I was just researching McCain's positons today.  Last year he said every American should do either military or Americorp service.

You know, that's about the only reasonable position that man has.  Making every American have an active stake in society upon attaining majority is a damned good idea, and might actually go a long way to getting rid of the selfish "rugged individualism" fetish we have in our country and our culture.  Rugged individualists!  What a load of shit.  The only rugged individualist we've actually ever had, who depended on no one but himself, was the Unabomber.

Offline

 

#12 2008-08-26 02:23:40

http://www.myplasticheart.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000001/series1_unabomber.jpg

Offline

 

#13 2008-08-26 03:10:28

McCain may very well have a recent history of intentional ambigious statements about a draft. He should be called on this one too, but I would give him a pass if he denies he meant to promote the draft idea in his answer.

The women was rambling and included multiple disjointed subjects. He may have wanted to respond to the main jist about veterans and not the periphial points. I think the natural political tendancy would be to look for an agreeable way out rather then potentionally create friction by picking it apart.

Offline

 

#14 2008-08-26 07:03:09

Johnny_Rotten wrote:

McCain may very well have a recent history of intentional ambigious statements about a draft. He should be called on this one too, but I would give him a pass if he denies he meant to promote the draft idea in his answer.

The women was rambling and included multiple disjointed subjects. He may have wanted to respond to the main jist about veterans and not the periphial points. I think the natural political tendancy would be to look for an agreeable way out rather then potentionally create friction by picking it apart.

It's not like the linked website would, in any way, want us to think bad things about McCain if it weren't true. They seem like a non-partisan group.

Offline

 

#15 2008-08-26 07:18:22

whiskytangofoxtrot wrote:

The only rugged individualist we've actually ever had, who depended on no one but himself, was the Unabomber.

Don't forget Eric Rudolph.

he survived during his years as a fugitive by camping in the woods, gathering acorns and salamanders, pilfering vegetable gardens, stealing grain from a grain silo, and raiding dumpsters in a nearby town.

Offline

 

#16 2008-08-26 08:56:56

That's not an "individualist". That's a raccoon.

Offline

 

#17 2008-08-26 10:07:45

pALEPHx wrote:

https://cruelery.com/sidepic/palesavatar.png

I see the resemblance, Ted.

Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs

Offline

 

#18 2008-08-26 10:54:14

Johnny_Rotten wrote:

McCain may very well have a recent history of intentional ambigious statements about a draft. He should be called on this one too, but I would give him a pass if he denies he meant to promote the draft idea in his answer.

The women was rambling and included multiple disjointed subjects. He may have wanted to respond to the main jist about veterans and not the periphial points. I think the natural political tendancy would be to look for an agreeable way out rather then potentionally create friction by picking it apart.

I tend to agree.  The only problem is as far as I've been able to tell nobody in the McCain campaign has "set the record straight" on this.  When you make a gaff like this one and the media picks up on it you usually do damage control fairly quickly.  If it had been Obama he would have made a speech about it by now mentioning how his grandma was a "typical draft supporting person".

Offline

 

#19 2008-08-26 12:19:44

karenw wrote:

whiskytangofoxtrot wrote:

The only rugged individualist we've actually ever had, who depended on no one but himself, was the Unabomber.

Don't forget Eric Rudolph.

he survived during his years as a fugitive by camping in the woods, gathering acorns and salamanders, pilfering vegetable gardens, stealing grain from a grain silo, and raiding dumpsters in a nearby town.

Rudolph may have been rugged but he was no individualist. He had some helping hands. Well at least he did till his brother cut off his own hand with a radial arm saw and mailed the videotape to the FBI to protest their investigation.

His tales about the seasons he spent camping on the ridge directly behind the FBI's task force HQ makes for a pretty good read. He would gaze down on the building watching the helocopters come and go every day as they searched for him.

Last edited by Johnny_Rotten (2008-08-26 12:20:55)

Offline

 

#20 2008-08-26 12:42:23

Eric Rudolph was a chickenshit sociopath.  Whackos who set time bombs to target innocents not only have faulty brain wiring, but they are cowards as well.  At least suicide bombers make commitments to their cause.

Offline

 

#21 2008-08-26 12:46:21

And as for the draft, I suggest we institute something similar to Israel's program.  Every young person must serve two years in either the armed forces or some humanitarian equivalent.  This could be the initiation into adulthood we sorely need in this country.

Offline

 

#22 2008-08-26 13:10:16

phreddy wrote:

And as for the draft, I suggest we institute something similar to Israel's program.  Every young person must serve two years in either the armed forces or some humanitarian equivalent.  This could be the initiation into adulthood we sorely need in this country.

I'm with you on that.  It'd benefit everyone, especially the young.

Unfortunately, there aren't enough balls in our whole politican population to even try to push such an initiative through.

Offline

 

#23 2008-08-26 13:27:42

phreddy wrote:

Eric Rudolph was a chickenshit sociopath.  Whackos who set time bombs to target innocents not only have faulty brain wiring, but they are cowards as well.  At least suicide bombers make commitments to their cause.

Just to clarify, I never said I liked the guy. I just thought his living-off-the-land-while-avoiding-capture story fit with the theme of the earlier comment re: Unabomber.

Offline

 

#24 2008-08-26 13:45:14

phreddy wrote:

And as for the draft, I suggest we institute something similar to Israel's program.  Every young person must serve two years in either the armed forces or some humanitarian equivalent.  This could be the initiation into adulthood we sorely need in this country.

Call me nuts but I'm against just about any idea that tells the government they can remove most of your rights and put your life more or less completely under its control against your will.  Somehow that grinds against my concept of freedom.  Forcing people to participated in some sort of "humanitarian equivalent" may not be as intrusive as forcing them to into the military but it's still forcing them to give up part of their life whether they want to or not.

I'm all for encouraging people to serve.  I'm all for rewarding people who serve.  Forcing them to serve is another thing...

Last edited by Zookeeper (2008-08-26 13:48:05)

Offline

 

#25 2008-08-26 16:45:05

phreddy wrote:

And as for the draft, I suggest we institute something similar to Israel's program.  Every young person must serve two years in either the armed forces or some humanitarian equivalent.  This could be the initiation into adulthood we sorely need in this country.

Great Idea now you're past the age that they'd want.

Offline

 

#26 2008-08-27 10:04:33

I think that everyone should join the military for at least a couple of years. But I stop short of making it mandatory. Making it mandatory removes every benefit that you would get from it. Why make it one more thing for young people to resent about their country?

You increase freedom by giving people options, not removing them.

Offline

 

#27 2008-08-27 18:09:43

Dmtdust wrote:

phreddy wrote:

And as for the draft, I suggest we institute something similar to Israel's program.  Every young person must serve two years in either the armed forces or some humanitarian equivalent.  This could be the initiation into adulthood we sorely need in this country.

Great Idea now you're past the age that they'd want.

Hey, I took my chances with it the first time around.  I've done my time, and now I've earned the right to force our young ones out therer to try to avoid becoming cannon fodder.  Interesting note.  I had the opportunity to speak with a Marine recruiter yesterday on other business.  During our discussions I asked him how business was doing.  His reply surprised me.  He said they have so many recruits that a person joining today would not be called up for boot camp until next February or March.

Offline

 

#28 2008-08-27 18:18:24

GooberMcNutly wrote:

I think that everyone should join the military for at least a couple of years. But I stop short of making it mandatory. Making it mandatory removes every benefit that you would get from it. Why make it one more thing for young people to resent about their country?

You increase freedom by giving people options, not removing them.

Everyone has to go to school through 12th grade.  At least that's what the law says.  I contend that 18 year olds are not adults and often make very fucked up decisions, especially when their parents are fucked up too.  Another two year obligation that focused on self discipline, work ethic, and respect for others would go a long way toward a healthy society.

Offline

 

#29 2008-08-27 18:53:03

phreddy wrote:

Everyone has to go to school through 12th grade.  At least that's what the law says.  I contend that 18 year olds are not adults and often make very fucked up decisions, especially when their parents are fucked up too.  Another two year obligation that focused on self discipline, work ethic, and respect for others would go a long way toward a healthy society.

If America had a long history of not going around starting wars with third world countries, I'd agree with you.  However, we are not the Swiss, and I think having a very large conscripted army laying around would be more temptation than most of our government could handle.

Offline

 

#30 2008-08-27 18:59:34

jesusluvspegging wrote:

I think having a very large conscripted army laying around would be more temptation than most of our government could handle.

The model is not military service but national service--like an American Peace Corps.  Stuff like planting trees, picking up litter, sweeping up the local government offices, whatever, in exchange for room & board & maybe a stipend.  Tasks that put one at physical risk, like military service, should be voluntary.

Offline

 

#31 2008-08-27 22:58:59

phreddy wrote:

Another two year obligation that focused on self discipline, work ethic, and respect for others would go a long way toward a healthy society.

Creating Boy/Girl Scouts by compulsion.

"Amendment XIII

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

Offline

 

#32 2008-08-27 23:21:46

phreddy wrote:

GooberMcNutly wrote:

I think that everyone should join the military for at least a couple of years. But I stop short of making it mandatory. Making it mandatory removes every benefit that you would get from it. Why make it one more thing for young people to resent about their country?

You increase freedom by giving people options, not removing them.

Everyone has to go to school through 12th grade.

Yes, and they have to go to bed when mommy and daddy tell them to.  And they have to eat their veggies.  THEY'RE CHILDREN.

I contend that 18 year olds are not adults and often make very fucked up decisions, especially when their parents are fucked up too.

1) You are wrong - they are chronologically adults whether they act their age or not.  2) If they aren't adults then you are advocating drafting kids into the military?

Another two year obligation that focused on self discipline, work ethic, and respect for others...

...killing on command, getting shot at, etc.  Yeah, nobody should be allowed to turn that down.

Offline

 

#33 2008-08-27 23:23:58

George Orr wrote:

jesusluvspegging wrote:

I think having a very large conscripted army laying around would be more temptation than most of our government could handle.

The model is not military service but national service--like an American Peace Corps.  Stuff like planting trees, picking up litter, sweeping up the local government offices, whatever, in exchange for room & board & maybe a stipend.  Tasks that put one at physical risk, like military service, should be voluntary.

Yeah.  What's another few million people on the government payroll so long as we can force them to work cheap?

Last edited by Zookeeper (2008-08-27 23:24:55)

Offline

 

#34 2008-08-28 01:27:44

Zookeeper wrote:

Yeah.  What's another few million people on the government payroll so long as we can force them to work cheap?

The last thing we need is another big government program to support this. The private sector can do it much more efficiently. We will have Blackwater run the compulsorary service for us.

Offline

 

#35 2008-08-28 04:35:47

jesusluvspegging wrote:

phreddy wrote:

Everyone has to go to school through 12th grade.  At least that's what the law says.  I contend that 18 year olds are not adults and often make very fucked up decisions, especially when their parents are fucked up too.  Another two year obligation that focused on self discipline, work ethic, and respect for others would go a long way toward a healthy society.

If America had a long history of not going around starting wars with third world countries, I'd agree with you.  However, we are not the Swiss, and I think having a very large conscripted army laying around would be more temptation than most of our government could handle.

That is exactly right. The temptation would be too much. It would be like getting a pack of grenades for Christmas and not playing with them.

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com