#1 2008-09-05 16:38:56
Offline
#2 2008-09-05 16:59:39
Offline
#3 2008-09-05 17:07:32
Offline
#4 2008-09-05 20:54:36
really bad old jokes set to still-picture youtube should count as a triple-hat with a complimentary kick in the ass . . .
Offline
#5 2008-09-05 22:25:54
Emmeran wrote:
really bad old jokes set to still-picture youtube should count as a triple-hat with a complimentary kick in the ass . . .
Speaking of spelling - it is almost impossible to make a kick in the ass "complimentary."
Morph that i to an e and you'll find yourself making (a sort of) sense again.
By the way, Sofa - all your videos are badly seated on the page pour moi.
Offline
#6 2008-09-05 23:02:46
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
Emmeran wrote:
really bad old jokes set to still-picture youtube should count as a triple-hat with a complimentary kick in the ass . . .
Speaking of spelling - it is almost impossible to make a kick in the ass "complimentary."
Morph that i to an e and you'll find yourself making (a sort of) sense again.
By the way, Sofa - all your videos are badly seated on the page pour moi.
Oh ye of little imagination... I meant it as I spelt it.
Offline
#7 2008-09-06 20:02:09
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
Emmeran wrote:
really bad old jokes set to still-picture youtube should count as a triple-hat with a complimentary kick in the ass . . .
Speaking of spelling - it is almost impossible to make a kick in the ass "complimentary."
Morph that i to an e and you'll find yourself making (a sort of) sense again.
By the way, Sofa - all your videos are badly seated on the page pour moi.
Firefox seems to have some trouble with the generic embedded SWF code.
Offline
#10 2008-09-07 15:24:46
WilberCuntLicker wrote:
A joke that bad deserves a durum roll.
Offline
