#1 2008-10-24 21:17:55

Offline

 

#2 2008-10-24 21:27:47

Awesome commercial

Offline

 

#3 2008-10-24 22:07:14

Awesome.

How'd you find it?

Offline

 

#4 2008-10-24 22:13:35

George Orr wrote:

Awesome.

How'd you find it?

Productions like that are viral. It appeared simultaneously on gawker and digg.

Offline

 

#5 2008-10-24 22:24:48

Hot Damn.  Thanks for sharing

Offline

 

#6 2008-10-25 18:16:47

Yay!  I didn't know the Soviets were still making propaganda films!

Offline

 

#7 2008-10-25 19:24:11

fortinbras wrote:

Yay!  I didn't know the Soviets were still making propaganda films!

Oh look, an insinuation that if you don't like the current party in power you must be communist.

How quaint.

Offline

 

#8 2008-10-25 19:30:44

Oh for fuck's sake, are we going to politicize this thread too? 

If anybody wants me I'll be in the cartoon thread.

Last edited by jesusluvspegging (2008-10-25 19:31:16)

Offline

 

#9 2008-10-26 09:20:11

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Oh for fuck's sake, are we going to politicize this thread too?

Uhh, it's about a political commercial?!?

Offline

 

#10 2008-10-26 09:22:16

GooberMcNutly wrote:

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Oh for fuck's sake, are we going to politicize this thread too?

Uhh, it's about a political commercial?!?

Shut up.

Offline

 

#11 2008-10-26 13:21:54

This is brilliant.  Foot In Ass,  shut up.  pay attention, and fucking grow a brain.

Offline

 

#12 2008-10-26 14:10:24

Dmtdust wrote:

This is brilliant.  Foot In Ass,  shut up.  pay attention, and fucking grow a brain.

Grow a brain?  Not gonna happen.  When I first started reading his posts I assumed he was about a sophmore in high school.  I was shocked to find that he's in his late 20s, and claims to have some college education.  I don't think he's ever even had an original thought in his entire life.

Offline

 

#13 2008-10-27 05:22:48

headkicker_girl wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

This is brilliant.  Foot In Ass,  shut up.  pay attention, and fucking grow a brain.

Grow a brain?  Not gonna happen.  When I first started reading his posts I assumed he was about a sophmore in high school.  I was shocked to find that he's in his late 20s, and claims to have some college education.  I don't think he's ever even had an original thought in his entire life.

The people's Republic of Headkick Girl?  The actually sounds appealing...what do you say?  Workers of the world unite!!

Offline

 

#14 2008-10-27 05:29:15

fortinbras wrote:

The people's Republic of Headkick Girl?  The actually sounds appealing...what do you say?  Workers of the world unite!!

Ptah's sock-puppet?

Offline

 

#15 2008-10-27 05:35:55

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

fortinbras wrote:

The people's Republic of Headkick Girl?  The actually sounds appealing...what do you say?  Workers of the world unite!!

Ptah's sock-puppet?

ok...sorry WilberCuntLicker...this is more for HeadCuntGirl....and yes I did get it from Drudge you stupid fucking communist scabies infested hag of a bitch.

Offline

 

#16 2008-10-27 05:39:11

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Ptah's sock-puppet?

I could see where one might assume as much; But, there is a distinct difference.  Foot-In-Ass is only capable of repeating sound-bites picked off of Faux News.  Where-As Ptah is perfectly capable of pulling shit out of his own ass (Of course, I mean that figuratively - I've no idea how he passes the quiet hours and it's really none of my business).

Offline

 

#17 2008-10-27 06:02:57

Decadence wrote:

Ptah is...pulling shit out of his own ass.

Sounds right to me.

Offline

 

#18 2008-10-27 06:40:45

Decadence wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Ptah's sock-puppet?

I could see where one might assume as much; But, there is a distinct difference.  Foot-In-Ass is only capable of repeating sound-bites picked off of Faux News.  Where-As Ptah is perfectly capable of pulling shit out of his own ass (Of course, I mean that figuratively - I've no idea how he passes the quiet hours and it's really none of my business).

So...its much easier to pick of news from communist publications as the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, The Chicago Tribune, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and The Wall Street Journal to guide me.

Offline

 

#19 2008-10-27 06:49:34

fortinbras wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

fortinbras wrote:

The people's Republic of Headkick Girl?  The actually sounds appealing...what do you say?  Workers of the world unite!!

Ptah's sock-puppet?

ok...sorry WilberCuntLicker...this is more for HeadCuntGirl....and yes I did get it from Drudge you stupid fucking communist scabies infested hag of a bitch.

Try not to be too hard on Fortinbras.  It's gotta make you real grumpy making excuses for McCain and Palin day in and day out, and since the intelligentsia of the party has already taken the lifeboats he's gotta keep playing his brave little heart out with the rest of the dumbasses in the band.

Last edited by tojo2000 (2008-10-27 06:50:59)

Offline

 

#20 2008-10-27 06:53:12

fortinbras wrote:

Decadence wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Ptah's sock-puppet?

I could see where one might assume as much; But, there is a distinct difference.  Foot-In-Ass is only capable of repeating sound-bites picked off of Faux News.  Where-As Ptah is perfectly capable of pulling shit out of his own ass (Of course, I mean that figuratively - I've no idea how he passes the quiet hours and it's really none of my business).

So...its much easier to pick of news from communist publications as the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, The Chicago Tribune, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and The Wall Street Journal to guide me.

Bwahahahahaha!

Offline

 

#21 2008-10-27 06:55:14

fortinbras wrote:

So...its much easier to pick of news from communist publications as the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, The Chicago Tribune, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and The Wall Street Journal to guide me.

Ignoring every-thing else that is wrong with that response, if you consider the Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal to be "Communist publications," you've either never read either of them, or you're some-what "to the right" of Augusto Pinochet.  Considering your obvious inability to form either an "opinion" or thought of your own, guess which way I'm leaning on this one?

Last edited by Decadence (2008-10-27 06:56:01)

Offline

 

#22 2008-10-27 07:02:44

Pinochet was no more right-wing than I am.  After all, he was a known collaborator with the Zionist conspiracy.

http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc263/jesusluvspegging/5d8cc471.jpg

Offline

 

#23 2008-10-27 08:42:01

jesusluvspegging wrote:

Pinochet was no more right-wing than I am.  After all, he was a known collaborator with the Zionist conspiracy.

http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc26 … 8cc471.jpg

Jew!!! ....Oh wait...

Offline

 

#24 2008-10-27 09:01:32

Decadence wrote:

fortinbras wrote:

So...its much easier to pick of news from communist publications as the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, The Chicago Tribune, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and The Wall Street Journal to guide me.

Ignoring every-thing else that is wrong with that response, if you consider the Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal to be "Communist publications," you've either never read either of them, or you're some-what "to the right" of Augusto Pinochet.  Considering your obvious inability to form either an "opinion" or thought of your own, guess which way I'm leaning on this one?

He's a fucking moron.  What do you expect?  No one with an IQ over 80 would call the Wall Street Journal, LA Times, or Chicago Tribune a communist paper.  The Tribune has not endorsed a Democrat for president in 160 years.  They gave Bush the nod for a second term despite his fuck ups.

It's sad when someone one only has the mental fortitude to regurgitate what Sean Hannity tells him to.

Last edited by headkicker_girl (2008-10-27 09:01:48)

Offline

 

#25 2008-10-27 09:05:08

headkicker_girl wrote:

Decadence wrote:

fortinbras wrote:

So...its much easier to pick of news from communist publications as the New York Times, CNN, MSNBC, The Chicago Tribune, ABC, CBS, NBC, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, and The Wall Street Journal to guide me.

Ignoring every-thing else that is wrong with that response, if you consider the Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal to be "Communist publications," you've either never read either of them, or you're some-what "to the right" of Augusto Pinochet.  Considering your obvious inability to form either an "opinion" or thought of your own, guess which way I'm leaning on this one?

He's a fucking moron.  What do you expect?  No one with an IQ over 80 would call the Wall Street Journal, LA Times, or Chicago Tribune a communist paper.  The Tribune has not endorsed a Democrat for president in 160 years.  They gave Bush the nod for a second term despite his fuck ups.

It's sad when someone one only has the mental fortitude to regurgitate what Sean Hannity tells him to.

When there is landslide victories for conservatism in 2010, and 2012, I want you to remember this moment as a moment of over confidence.

Last edited by fortinbras (2008-10-27 09:09:59)

Offline

 

#26 2008-10-27 09:05:18

If posted before, my apologies. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxm20ZcONOk

Offline

 

#27 2008-10-27 09:05:21

Decadence wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Ptah's sock-puppet?

I could see where one might assume as much; But, there is a distinct difference.  Foot-In-Ass is only capable of repeating sound-bites picked off of Faux News.  Where-As Ptah is perfectly capable of pulling shit out of his own ass (Of course, I mean that figuratively - I've no idea how he passes the quiet hours and it's really none of my business).

I have to agree.  While Fuckingmorontinbras can only repeat what he's heard, Ptah does at least do his own analysis, which I don't ever agree with, but at least he can claim it as his own.  Fuckingmorontinbras still uses Matt Drudge as a source of information, which is pretty damn sad.

Offline

 

#28 2008-10-27 09:10:26

fortinbras wrote:

headkicker_girl wrote:

Dmtdust wrote:

This is brilliant.  Foot In Ass,  shut up.  pay attention, and fucking grow a brain.

Grow a brain?  Not gonna happen.  When I first started reading his posts I assumed he was about a sophmore in high school.  I was shocked to find that he's in his late 20s, and claims to have some college education.  I don't think he's ever even had an original thought in his entire life.

The people's Republic of Headkick Girl?  The actually sounds appealing...what do you say?  Workers of the world unite!!

Dictionary...use one.  Look up "communism" and "socialism," you fucking hack.  Bush just socialized the banking industry, nitwit, and the progressive tax system has always been based on redistribution of wealth.  Here in the USA we will stick to our Democratic Oligarchy, so idiots like you can continue to vote against your economic interest thereby keeping rich white men in power whose only goal is to fuck you over.

Offline

 

#29 2008-10-27 09:11:53

Fled wrote:

If posted before, my apologies. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxm20ZcONOk

Brilliant...sexism in action...women are suffering throughout the world, so would you agree with a program to end women suffrage?

Offline

 

#30 2008-10-27 09:11:56

fortinbras wrote:

headkicker_girl wrote:

Decadence wrote:


Ignoring every-thing else that is wrong with that response, if you consider the Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal to be "Communist publications," you've either never read either of them, or you're some-what "to the right" of Augusto Pinochet.  Considering your obvious inability to form either an "opinion" or thought of your own, guess which way I'm leaning on this one?

He's a fucking moron.  What do you expect?  No one with an IQ over 80 would call the Wall Street Journal, LA Times, or Chicago Tribune a communist paper.  The Tribune has not endorsed a Democrat for president in 160 years.  They gave Bush the nod for a second term despite his fuck ups.

It's sad when someone one only has the mental fortitude to regurgitate what Sean Hannity tells him to.

When there is landslide victories for conservatism in 2010, and 2012, I want you to remember this moment as a moment of over confidence.

Blah, blah, blah.  If McCain and Palin were the best you could do in 2008, your party is royally FUCKED.

Offline

 

#31 2008-10-27 09:16:32

fortinbras wrote:

Fled wrote:

If posted before, my apologies. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fxm20ZcONOk

Brilliant...sexism in action...women are suffering throughout the world, so would you agree with a program to end women suffrage?

You manage to out-stupid yourself at every turn.  I guess there is something to be said for your constant striving.

Offline

 

#32 2008-10-27 09:18:16

headkicker_girl wrote:

fortinbras wrote:

headkicker_girl wrote:

He's a fucking moron.  What do you expect?  No one with an IQ over 80 would call the Wall Street Journal, LA Times, or Chicago Tribune a communist paper.  The Tribune has not endorsed a Democrat for president in 160 years.  They gave Bush the nod for a second term despite his fuck ups.

It's sad when someone one only has the mental fortitude to regurgitate what Sean Hannity tells him to.

When there is landslide victories for conservatism in 2010, and 2012, I want you to remember this moment as a moment of over confidence.

Blah, blah, blah.  If McCain and Palin were the best you could do in 2008, your party is royally FUCKED.

Are you fucking kidding me?  You have to be fucking kidding me...99.999% of logical people wouldn't consider McCain conservative if you took them out to hookah bars and out drinking all night, his own party only supports him by default...he hasn't appeared on Rush, Hannity, the Leprachuan(O'Reilly), or even liberal G Gordon Liddy's show...this is a major loss from the standpoint of trying to be democrat/liberal-lite, not conservatism as a whole, anyways, be in shock in 2010, 2012 when it happens, its cool, whatever.  Change should be gradual, thats not whats going to happen...everything that you hope will happen right now will end in massive disaster.

Last edited by fortinbras (2008-10-27 09:18:45)

Offline

 

#33 2008-10-27 09:32:16

fortinbras wrote:

When there is landslide victories for conservatism in 2010, and 2012, I want you to remember this moment as a moment of over confidence.

Bwwaaahahahahah!

Offline

 

#34 2008-10-27 09:37:11

fortinbras wrote:

99.999% of logical people wouldn't consider McCain conservative if you took them out to hookah bars and out drinking all night, his own party only supports him by default...he hasn't appeared on Rush, Hannity, the Leprachuan(O'Reilly), or even liberal G Gordon Liddy's show...this is a major loss from the standpoint of trying to be democrat/liberal-lite, not conservatism as a whole, anyways, be in shock in 2010, 2012 when it happens, its cool, whatever.  Change should be gradual, thats not whats going to happen...everything that you hope will happen right now will end in massive disaster.

You fail to realize that McCain was selected by the Republicans themselves, they had choices and were sick of your heroes.  Those republicans that were left anyway - a whole-shitload of them moved to independent in response to the corruption and cronyism of the last 8 years.  Like I did.

You might want to come to grips with the fact that America is pretty sick of your brand of republicanism, and if the GOP wants back in power there is going to need to be some drastic changes.

Offline

 

#35 2008-10-27 12:10:05

Emmeran wrote:

fortinbras wrote:

99.999% of logical people wouldn't consider McCain conservative if you took them out to hookah bars and out drinking all night, his own party only supports him by default...he hasn't appeared on Rush, Hannity, the Leprachuan(O'Reilly), or even liberal G Gordon Liddy's show...this is a major loss from the standpoint of trying to be democrat/liberal-lite, not conservatism as a whole, anyways, be in shock in 2010, 2012 when it happens, its cool, whatever.  Change should be gradual, thats not whats going to happen...everything that you hope will happen right now will end in massive disaster.

You fail to realize that McCain was selected by the Republicans themselves, they had choices and were sick of your heroes.  Those republicans that were left anyway - a whole-shitload of them moved to independent in response to the corruption and cronyism of the last 8 years.  Like I did.

You might want to come to grips with the fact that America is pretty sick of your brand of republicanism, and if the GOP wants back in power there is going to need to be some drastic changes.

Fuckingmorontinbras is not in favor of Democracy.  He does not believe the members of his own party who voted for McCain are competent to select a leader.  He believes the selection of a leader should be left to Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly and other talk show hosts who obviously are better suited to select a candidate than the members of his own party.  It really is sad.

Offline

 

#36 2008-10-27 13:01:55

headkicker_girl wrote:

Emmeran wrote:

fortinbras wrote:

99.999% of logical people wouldn't consider McCain conservative if you took them out to hookah bars and out drinking all night, his own party only supports him by default...he hasn't appeared on Rush, Hannity, the Leprachuan(O'Reilly), or even liberal G Gordon Liddy's show...this is a major loss from the standpoint of trying to be democrat/liberal-lite, not conservatism as a whole, anyways, be in shock in 2010, 2012 when it happens, its cool, whatever.  Change should be gradual, thats not whats going to happen...everything that you hope will happen right now will end in massive disaster.

You fail to realize that McCain was selected by the Republicans themselves, they had choices and were sick of your heroes.  Those republicans that were left anyway - a whole-shitload of them moved to independent in response to the corruption and cronyism of the last 8 years.  Like I did.

You might want to come to grips with the fact that America is pretty sick of your brand of republicanism, and if the GOP wants back in power there is going to need to be some drastic changes.

Fuckingmorontinbras is not in favor of Democracy.  He does not believe the members of his own party who voted for McCain are competent to select a leader.  He believes the selection of a leader should be left to Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly and other talk show hosts who obviously are better suited to select a candidate than the members of his own party.  It really is sad.

I was just going to point out that the commie rag the Wall Street Journal was a Murdoch News Corp baby just like his revered GOP Party leaders Hannity and Orly.

But I think I will show you where Forty gets all his material.

Good Riddance, GOP Moderates

And here amongst the peanut gallery:

Let the purges begin!!!

It’s about time these idiots are away from our party. Their opinions never mattered anyway.
The republican party is fine. The MSM blow up Noonan, Frum, and Brooks as representatives for the party, when they in fact are far away from reality.
Since they and Buckley, Parker, and some other doofuses, claim to have some standing with the party, why is it that they are shunned?
Doesn’t that give a clear indication that we don’t value their opinion?
Rush, Sean, Levin, Bennett, and other conservatives on radio who have huge audiences are the ones with high ratings in listenership. They are the real representatives for the republican party.

Offline

 

#37 2008-10-27 13:31:05

headkicker_girl wrote:

Emmeran wrote:

fortinbras wrote:

99.999% of logical people wouldn't consider McCain conservative if you took them out to hookah bars and out drinking all night, his own party only supports him by default...he hasn't appeared on Rush, Hannity, the Leprachuan(O'Reilly), or even liberal G Gordon Liddy's show...this is a major loss from the standpoint of trying to be democrat/liberal-lite, not conservatism as a whole, anyways, be in shock in 2010, 2012 when it happens, its cool, whatever.  Change should be gradual, thats not whats going to happen...everything that you hope will happen right now will end in massive disaster.

You fail to realize that McCain was selected by the Republicans themselves, they had choices and were sick of your heroes.  Those republicans that were left anyway - a whole-shitload of them moved to independent in response to the corruption and cronyism of the last 8 years.  Like I did.

You might want to come to grips with the fact that America is pretty sick of your brand of republicanism, and if the GOP wants back in power there is going to need to be some drastic changes.

Fuckingmorontinbras is not in favor of Democracy.  He does not believe the members of his own party who voted for McCain are competent to select a leader.  He believes the selection of a leader should be left to Rush, Hannity, O'Reilly and other talk show hosts who obviously are better suited to select a candidate than the members of his own party.  It really is sad.

It was a very weak choice between Mitt Romney, Huckabee, and the strongest candidate Giulliani barely ran a campaign, if a conservative invalid ran they would have beat McCain.

Last edited by fortinbras (2008-10-27 13:31:58)

Offline

 

#38 2008-10-27 13:42:55

I would have *loved* to see a Giuliani campaign.

Offline

 

#39 2008-10-27 16:54:40

Let's face it, none of them would have done well.  Bush/Cheney set them up hard, and the oil gambit was the last straw; they got their precious offshore drilling but bankrupted middle America and the Finance Industry in the process.

Reagan himself would have lost this one...



btw:  I have Haliburton as a "Strong Buy"

Last edited by Emmeran (2008-10-27 16:55:13)

Offline

 

#40 2008-10-27 18:20:50

Look, there's a reason no one wants to run for President on the GOP ticket.  Aside from huge ideological differences within the party,everyone has skeletons.  No one wants their shit exposed to the light of day, which is why you have holy rollers like Romney and Huckabee with nothing to hide, reluctant candidates like Guliani who really didn't want to be under the microscope, and egomaniacs like McCain.

Offline

 

#41 2008-10-27 18:28:37

headkicker_girl wrote:

Look, there's a reason no one wants to run for President on the GOP ticket.  Aside from huge ideological differences within the party,everyone has skeletons.  No one wants their shit exposed to the light of day, which is why you have holy rollers like Romney and Huckabee with nothing to hide, reluctant candidates like Guliani who really didn't want to be under the microscope, and egomaniacs like McCain.

While I do believe there are those who run for public office because they sincerely want to perform public service, in almost any case I'd guess there's a huge amount of ego involved. No one who wants to avoid being placed front and center would even think of running for public office, in either party.

Offline

 

#42 2008-10-28 01:43:03

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Decadence wrote:

Ptah is...pulling shit out of his own ass.

Sounds right to me.

I think you, Dec and the supreme court should stay out of my ass!!! What I chose to pull out of my ass is my business and the business of those I share my ass-rendered productions with!!!

I'm quite firm on this. It is my ass-bounty to do with as I please.

As Yoda would say:

"Once government up into your ass, sock puppet of theirs you become!"

I'm not anyone's sock puppet, only my hand goes up there!!!!

Offline

 

#43 2008-10-28 01:46:01

headkicker_girl wrote:

Decadence wrote:

WilberCuntLicker wrote:

Ptah's sock-puppet?

I could see where one might assume as much; But, there is a distinct difference.  Foot-In-Ass is only capable of repeating sound-bites picked off of Faux News.  Where-As Ptah is perfectly capable of pulling shit out of his own ass (Of course, I mean that figuratively - I've no idea how he passes the quiet hours and it's really none of my business).

I have to agree.  While Fuckingmorontinbras can only repeat what he's heard, Ptah does at least do his own analysis, which I don't ever agree with, but at least he can claim it as his own.  Fuckingmorontinbras still uses Matt Drudge as a source of information, which is pretty damn sad.

This is the sweetest thing you've ever said about me, HKG!

I don't know what to say?

Wanna toss salads?

Offline

 

#44 2008-10-28 01:47:16

ptah13 wrote:

headkicker_girl wrote:

Decadence wrote:


I could see where one might assume as much; But, there is a distinct difference.  Foot-In-Ass is only capable of repeating sound-bites picked off of Faux News.  Where-As Ptah is perfectly capable of pulling shit out of his own ass (Of course, I mean that figuratively - I've no idea how he passes the quiet hours and it's really none of my business).

I have to agree.  While Fuckingmorontinbras can only repeat what he's heard, Ptah does at least do his own analysis, which I don't ever agree with, but at least he can claim it as his own.  Fuckingmorontinbras still uses Matt Drudge as a source of information, which is pretty damn sad.

This is the sweetest thing you've ever said about me, HKG!

I don't know what to say?

Wanna toss salads?

Look to your messages Ptah...

Offline

 

#45 2008-10-28 08:53:56

ptah13 wrote:

headkicker_girl wrote:

Decadence wrote:


I could see where one might assume as much; But, there is a distinct difference.  Foot-In-Ass is only capable of repeating sound-bites picked off of Faux News.  Where-As Ptah is perfectly capable of pulling shit out of his own ass (Of course, I mean that figuratively - I've no idea how he passes the quiet hours and it's really none of my business).

I have to agree.  While Fuckingmorontinbras can only repeat what he's heard, Ptah does at least do his own analysis, which I don't ever agree with, but at least he can claim it as his own.  Fuckingmorontinbras still uses Matt Drudge as a source of information, which is pretty damn sad.

This is the sweetest thing you've ever said about me, HKG!

I don't know what to say?

Wanna toss salads?

Sure, but you have to go first.

Offline

 

Board footer

cruelery.com