#2451 2008-12-23 18:38:20
choad wrote:
New Banner Added:
https://cruelery.com/header/eatyourpeas.png
Does this one have some special significance, or inside joke, of which I'm not aware?
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2452 2008-12-24 03:15:00
pALEPHx wrote:
choad wrote:
New Banner Added:
https://cruelery.com/header/eatyourpeas.pngDoes this one have some special significance, or inside joke, of which I'm not aware?
Nope, sorry, failed experiment. Go ahead and hose it.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2453 2008-12-24 03:31:34
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2454 2008-12-25 13:59:16
Are we supposed to add the side-banners our-self some-how; Or, are my submissions all simply being ignored due to the fact that I'm the only one who enjoys them (Just wondering)?
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2455 2008-12-25 18:33:42
Decadence wrote:
Are we supposed to add the side-banners our-self some-how; Or, are my submissions all simply being ignored due to the fact that I'm the only one who enjoys them (Just wondering)?
The first rule of sidepics is you do not talk about sidepics -- um, I mean, they must be 200 pixels wide. No more, no less.
The second rule of sidepics is they must be in JPG, PNG, or GIF formats.
I don't think anyone besides choad and myself has stepped forward to get login accounts on the server, so at this point you'll have to post your images and hope one of us is amused enough upload them.
Offline
#2456 2008-12-26 02:20:26
square wrote:
I don't think anyone besides choad and myself has stepped forward to get login accounts on the server . . ..
A true sign that we've evolved. Can you imagine what this group would have done with full-access to Cruel.com?
Offline
#2457 2008-12-28 03:00:34
And I have no idea what to do with this image... but I place it here for those who wish to enjoy it, as I did, whilst mildly impaired....
Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-12-28 03:39:50)
Offline
#2458 2008-12-28 04:02:38
Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-12-28 04:03:05)
Offline
#2459 2008-12-28 04:41:09
While all very interesting, which ones were intended to be banners and which ones sidepics?
Offline
#2460 2008-12-28 10:04:09
Just fodder... I find'em, you just use'em as you wish. All three would make good sidepics, I think... but if you can think of a good caption, use'em as banners.
Offline
#2461 2008-12-28 20:09:07
More fodder.
Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-12-28 20:29:16)
Offline
#2462 2008-12-28 22:09:33
Some complete banners would be nice, too. We really should have a different thread for the sidepics by now.
Offline
#2463 2008-12-28 22:38:08
Hey, you guys are way better at thinking up banners than I am.... I'm happy just supplying bizarre or inane images.... you've used lots of them so far, so hopefully they've been of some help.
Here's yet another fodder item....
Edit: found new location for dead pic.
Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-12-29 21:54:15)
Offline
#2464 2008-12-28 22:44:15
pALEPHx wrote:
Oh, and here ya go...
Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-12-28 22:47:12)
Offline
#2465 2008-12-28 23:32:57
I'd suggest posting fodder to the picture thread to avoid cluttering up this one. Don't know about anyone else, but I occasionally look through there for material.
Edit: nice tits.
Last edited by square (2008-12-29 00:40:16)
Offline
#2466 2008-12-28 23:49:39
New Banner Added:
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2467 2008-12-29 00:51:52
square wrote:
I'd suggest posting fodder to the picture thread to avoid cluttering up this one. Don't know about anyone else, but I occasionally look through there for material.
Edit: nice tits.
Hmm.. well, that's really a NSFW thread, so I hate to clutter it up with SFW crap. We probably do need a SFW/Banner/Sidebar/Fodder sticky thread if you don't want it here.
Offline
#2468 2008-12-29 14:38:04
whosasailorthen wrote:
Hmm.. well, that's really a NSFW thread, so I hate to clutter it up with SFW crap. We probably do need a SFW/Banner/Sidebar/Fodder sticky thread if you don't want it here.
It's not like it's a ridiculous amount being posted; So, I don't feel that yet an-other "sticky" thread is warranted (Then again, it doesn't bother me seeing them in here). And, obviously, posting them in the NSFW thread would piss people off in there (And, right-fully so).
Offline
#2469 2008-12-29 21:36:11
I just don't see why the banner thread is also for sidepics. An opinion. Would someone like to create a sidepic thread so there is a separate place to examine offerings and resize them as necessary? Such efforts aren't required here.
Offline
#2470 2008-12-29 22:44:55
Well, whilst you're deciding.....
And a personal favourite....
Offline
#2471 2008-12-30 03:05:06
#2472 2008-12-30 03:26:41
Credit whosasailorthen from two posts ago.
Edit: by my count, we're over 1150 sidepics by now. I'd like to get around to implementing a similar voting system to the top banners or some other way of weeding out less worthy ones.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by square (2008-12-30 03:58:04)
Offline
#2473 2008-12-30 03:40:00
square wrote:
https://cruelery.com/sidepic/hsovfingerstache.jpg https://cruelery.com/sidepic/hsovyoulooktasty.jpg
Credit whosasailorthen from two posts ago.
Thanks for that. Just sayin, tho... on the first one you missed out on the self-cutting on the arm... I thought that was the especially cruel bit.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-12-30 03:44:29)
Offline
#2474 2008-12-30 03:42:30
square wrote:
Not entirely happy with either of these; feedback or tagline suggestions welcome.
http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/5748 … er1dq2.jpg
http://img116.imageshack.us/img116/6276 … er2we7.jpg
"Billy's Got a Gun"
Or....
"Welcoming Future VT Students".
Last edited by whosasailorthen (2008-12-30 03:47:18)
Offline
#2475 2008-12-30 04:06:07
whosasailorthen wrote:
on the first one you missed out on the self-cutting on the arm...
Saw it, but don't think it would show up very well in a smaller image. Same deal with the superhero's erection. Subtle just doesn't seem to work well in miniature.
Offline
#2476 2008-12-30 04:11:56
whosasailorthen wrote:
"Welcoming Future VT Students".
Ah, yes, sat through many boring lectures in Norris Hall (and a few interesting ones).
Offline
#2477 2008-12-30 08:56:30
square wrote:
whosasailorthen wrote:
on the first one you missed out on the self-cutting on the arm...
Saw it, but don't think it would show up very well in a smaller image. Same deal with the superhero's erection. Subtle just doesn't seem to work well in miniature.
You're right, it doesn't. Everything I post there gets tweaked.
Many of the first sidepics were iconographic images I obsessively restored from damaged, faded and poorly scanned originals. The stress here is on ICON. The larger the original the better, or color, detail and appeal get lost.
Never had this much fun as a kid.
The archive now totals 1167. Number one was this little guy.
1/01/2008 12:45 62,313 evolve.jpg
Appropriate, eh? One year on, sidepics need to evolve.
I've said this before: My coding chops marched south to the sea many dead languages ago or the scheme I would write for it would look roughly like this:
Separate header and sidepic archives cataloged by content, uploader, date, and selection numbers, rather than displays.
Member profile selection of random header and sidepic images.
Vistor pool of random images culled from top member selections.
I like the "Zombie's SFW Picture Thread!" idea.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2478 2008-12-30 10:14:44
Then so let it be.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2479 2008-12-31 01:44:19
choad wrote:
Separate header and sidepic archives cataloged by content, uploader, date, and selection numbers, rather than displays.
Member profile selection of random header and sidepic images.
Vistor pool of random images culled from top member selections.
Things I like now about the sidepics:
- Random selection makes it likely something I'd never choose myself pops up
- Everyone gets the same ones for a given ten-minute window.
Perhaps for registered members two sidepics could be from the user's chosen pool, and the third a random choice.
Right now the sidepic selection is entirely separate from the board's PHP code, so would require a decent bit of work to integrate into the rest of things.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2480 2009-01-01 11:09:45
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by choad (2009-01-09 18:30:49)
Offline
#2481 2009-01-08 00:23:55
Sidepic?
I don't mind the present random side display, but do they have to be hotlinked to the front page?
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2482 2009-01-08 05:37:05
#2483 2009-01-08 10:49:09
No need to link them. If you see one, you're already here.
Offline
#2484 2009-01-08 16:02:34
whosasailorthen wrote:
No need to link them. If you see one, you're already here.
I agree, if I have any say in the matter. Speaking of things over which I exercise moderate control, why haven't we seen any actual banners in a great while?
Offline
#2485 2009-01-08 19:44:46
pALEPHx wrote:
why haven't we seen any actual banners in a great while?
Inertia.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2486 2009-01-09 09:36:18
whosasailorthen wrote:
No need to link them. If you see one, you're already here.
OK, that's taken care of.
Offline
#2487 2009-01-09 12:48:02
square wrote:
whosasailorthen wrote:
No need to link them. If you see one, you're already here.
OK, that's taken care of.
Yeah, except I wrote sidepic's that way because I found it easier to navigate the site. Myself, I'd rather have them go somewhere. Anyone else?
Offline
#2488 2009-01-10 11:19:11
choad wrote:
Yeah, except I wrote sidepic's that way because I found it easier to navigate the site. Myself, I'd rather have them go somewhere. Anyone else?
That's one for, sigmoid freud and whosasailorthen seem against, and I'm indifferent. Others please chime in.
Offline
#2489 2009-01-10 19:58:17
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Last edited by choad (2009-01-10 20:49:30)
Offline
#2490 2009-01-10 20:43:39
square wrote:
choad wrote:
Yeah, except I wrote sidepic's that way because I found it easier to navigate the site. Myself, I'd rather have them go somewhere. Anyone else?
That's one for, sigmoid freud and whosasailorthen seem against, and I'm indifferent. Others please chime in.
I'm not really 'against'... I just can't see any point.
Offline
#2491 2009-01-10 20:55:40
whosasailorthen wrote:
I'm not really 'against'... I just can't see any point.
For most folks, I'm sure there probably isn't but I routinely bounce all over the dimly lit parts of the site checking to see what's what. Regulars rarely venture beyond the main message area. New visitors often loiter no farther than the front page.
Offline
#2492 2009-01-10 21:07:48
choad wrote:
New visitors often loiter no farther than the front page.
In that case, we should post new shit to the Front Page more often. Long as it's something good. I nominate Bibleman vs Jewy Jewstein.
(I was under the impression that We The Anointed could "front-page" topics ourselves; but either I am wrong about that, or I just can't figure out how to do it.)
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2493 2009-01-10 21:37:22
choad wrote:
Yeah, except I wrote sidepic's that way because I found it easier to navigate the site. Myself, I'd rather have them go somewhere. Anyone else?
Hyper-Linked to a random thread?
Snowball wrote:
(I was under the impression that We The Anointed could "front-page" topics ourselves; but either I am wrong about that, or I just can't figure out how to do it.)
Yes, you can post to the front page. I'll message you the instructions.
Offline
#2494 2009-01-10 21:41:19
Decadence wrote:
Yes, you can post to the front page. I'll message you the instructions.
Bless-ed be, another vic-volunteer.
Offline
#2495 2009-01-10 21:52:56
choad wrote:
Bless-ed be, another vic-volunteer.
In-Deed - That should take a bit of the load off you and I. And, I haven't seen any-thing that I felt was worthy of the front page in a-while; But, I'll agree with Snowball on "Jewy Springstein." The old lady cracked me the fuck up.
Offline
#2496 2009-01-10 22:11:35
George Orr wrote:
(I was under the impression that We The Anointed could "front-page" topics ourselves; but either I am wrong about that, or I just can't figure out how to do it.)
The Anointed can follow these instructions; plebes can click the "Report" link on a worthy post and leave a brief note that they'd like to see it on the front page.
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2497 2009-01-11 12:51:52
#2498 2009-01-11 21:30:53
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline
#2499 2009-01-12 12:36:54
Sidebar?
Auto-edited on 2020-08-02 to update URLs
Offline